Breussoud, D. (2015). Insights from the MAA national study of college calculus. The Mathematics Teacher, 109, 178–185.261.
Eagan, K., Hurtado, H., Figueroa, T., & Hughes, B. (2014). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions. Commissioned paper prepared for the committee on barriers and opportunities in completing 2- and 4-year STEM degrees. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_088834.pdf
Ferrare, J. J. (2019). A multi-institutional analysis of instructional beliefs and practices in gateway courses to the sciences. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(2), ar26.
Ferrare, J. J., & Miller, J. M. (2019). Making sense of persistence in scientific purgatory: A multi-institutional analysis of instructors in introductory science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–26.
Flanders, G. R. (2017). The effect of gateway course completion on freshman college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(1), 2–24.
Foertsch, J. M., Millar, S. B., Squire, L., & Gunter, R. (1997). Persuading professors: A study in the dissemination of educational reform in research institutions. Report to the NSF education and human resources directorate, Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication. Washington DC: University of Wisconsin-Madison, LEAD Center.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Ginorio, A. (1995). Warming the climate for women in academic science. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, Program on the Status and Education of Women.
Givens, S. M. B., & Tassie, K. E. (Eds.) (2014). Underserved women of color, voice, and resistance: Claiming a seat at the table. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
Grave, N. D. (2018). Demographics and the demand for higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Greenwood, M. R. C., & North, K. K. (1999). Science through the looking glass: Winning the battles but losing the war? Science, 286(5447), 2072–2078.
Hrabowski, F. A. (2003). Raising minority achievement in science and math. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 44–49.
Kardash, C. A. M., & Wallace, M. L. (2001). The perceptions of science classes survey: What undergraduate science reform efforts really need to address. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 199–210.
Koch, A. K. (2017). It’s about the gateway courses: Defining and contextualizing the issue. In A. K. Koch (Ed.), Improving teaching, learning, equity, and success in gateway courses (pp. 11–17). New Directions for Higher Education (180). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Koch, A. K. (2018). Big inequity in small things: Toward an end to a tyranny of practice. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 27(6), 1–5.
Koch, A. K., & Drake, B. M. (2018). Digging into the disciplines: The impact of gateway courses in accounting, calculus, and chemistry on student success. Brevard, NC: John N. Gardner Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education.
Koch, A. K., & Rodier, R. (2014). Gateways to completion guidebook. Brevard, NC: John N. Gardner Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education.
Laursen, S. L., Hunter, A.-B., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Manoucheka, C., Diaz, S., Ginorio, A., & Joseph, R. (2014). A resistance story: Negotiating the institutional and material through collectivity. In S. B. Givens & K. E. Tassie (Eds.), Claiming a seat at the table: Feminism, underserved women of color, voice and resistance (pp. 91–106). Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Lexington Books.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure (revised and enlarged edition). New York, NY: The Free Press
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc. (2013). 2013 NACME data book: A comprehensive analysis of the “new” American dilemma. White Plains, NY: Author.
Parson, T. (1968). The structure of social action. New York, NY: The Free Press.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2013). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 783–795.
Rask, K. (2010). Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013
Schutz, A. (1971). Collected papers: The problems of social reality. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Seymour, E., & DeWelde, C. (2016). Why doesn’t knowing change anything? Constraints and resistance, leverage and sustainability (with K. De Welde). In Weaver, G. C., Burgess, W. D., Childress, A. L., & Slakey, L. (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.
Seymour, E., Melton, G., Pedersen-Gallegos, L., & Wiese, D. J. (2005). Partners in innovation: Teaching assistants in college science courses. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
Suresh, R. (2006). The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 8(2), 215–239.
Tinto, V. (2000). Linking learning and leaving. Exploring the role of the college classroom in student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 81–94). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.