Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Alexander, C., Chen, E., & Grumbach, K. (2009). How leaky is the health career pipeline? Minority student achievement in college gateway courses. Academic Medicine, 84(6), 797–802.
Ambrose, S. (1966). Duty, honor, country: A history of west point. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Astin, A., & Astin, A. S. (1993). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational research pipeline in the sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Beichner, R. J. (2008). The SCALE-UP project: A student-centered active learning environment for undergraduate programs. Commissioned paper for the national academies workshop: Evidence on promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html
Beichner, R. J., & Saul, J. M. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP (student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs) project. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” (pp. 1–17). Varenna, Italy.
Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., … Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP). In E. F. Redish & P. J. Cooney (Eds.), Research-based reform of university physics. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/PER/per_reviews/volume1.cfm
Berrett, D. (2011, November 6). What spurs students to stay in college and learn? Good teaching practices and diversity. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/What-Spurs-Students-to-Stay-in/129670/
Biggers, M., Brauer, A. & Yilmaz, T. (2008, March). Student perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors vs. CS leavers. Paper presented at the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, Portland, OR. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352274
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Bonous-Hammarth, M. (2000). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 92–111.
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Braxton, J. M., Shaw Sullivan, A. V., & Johnson, R. M., Jr. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York, NY: Agathon.
Bressoud, D., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus (MAA notes). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational outlook handbook, 2012–2013 ed. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh
Callahan, K. M. (2009). Academic-centered peer interactions and retention in undergraduate mathematics programs. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(3), 361–389.
Campbell, G. (1993, March 31). Visions of engineering education in Century 11. The Porth Distinguished Lecture, University of Missouri at Rolla, Rolla, MO.
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science, technology, engineering, mathematics. Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/stem-complete.pdf
Cejda, B. D., Kaylor, A. J., & Rewey, K. L. (1998). Transfer shock in an academic discipline: The relationship between students’ majors and their academic performance. Community College Review., 26(3), 1–14.
Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP). (2018). When financial aid falls short: New data reveal students face thousands in unmet needs. Washington, DC.
Chang, M. J., Cerna, O., Han, J., & Saenz, V. (2008). The contradictory roles of institutional status in retaining underrepresented minorities in biomedical and behavioral science majors. The Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 433–464.
Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching., 51(5), 555–580.
Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Chen, X. (2015). STEM attrition among high-performing college students in the United States: Scope and potential causes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 41–59.
Clewell, B. C., de Cohen, C. C., Tsui, L., Forcier, L., Gao, E., Young, N., … West, C. (2006). Final report on the evaluation of the National Science Foundation Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation Program. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, D., & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, England: Sage.
Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a hispanic-serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942.
Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056–1063.
DeAngelo, L., Franke, R., Hurtado, S., Pryor, J. H., & Tran, S. (2011). The American freshman: National norms for fall 2009. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
DeAngelo, L., Hurtado, S., Pryor, J. H., Kelly, K. R., & Santos, J. L. (2009). The American college teacher: National norms for the 2007–2008 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? Technology, 14(2), 243–279.
Drew, C. (2011, November 4). Why science majors change their minds (it’s just so darn hard). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/education/edlife/why-science-majors-change-their-mind-its-just-so-darn-hard.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=christopher%20drew%20science%20majors&st=cse
Durkheim, E. (2005) Suicide: A study in sociology. In J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson (Trans.) London and New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Eagan, K., Hurtado, H., Figueroa, T. & Hughes, B. (2014). Examining STEM pathways among students who began college at four-year institutions. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in completing 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Retrieved April, 2015, from: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_088834.pdf
Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2010, November). What matters in STEM: Institutional contexts that influence bachelor’s degree completion rates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Indianapolis, IN.
Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., Figueroa, T., & Hughes, B. (2012). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Ege, S. N., Coppola, B. P., & Lawton, R. G. (1997). The University of Michigan undergraduate chemistry curriculum. 1. Philosophy, curriculum, and the nature of change. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(1), 74–83.
Elizondo-Montemayor, L., Hernández-Escobar, C., Ayala-Aguirre, F., & Aguilar, G. M. (2008). Building a sense of ownership to facilitate change: The new curriculum. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(1), 83–102.
Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after Calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One, 11(7), e0157447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
Espinosa, L. L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–240.
Festinger, L. (1961). The psychological effects of insufficient rewards. American Psychologist, 16(1), 1–11.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and math. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science., 111(23), 8410–8415.
Garcia, G. A., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Predicting Latina/o STEM persistence at HSIs and non-HSIs. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA.
Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multi-contextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261.
Gates, S. J., & Mirkin, C. (2012). Engage to excel. Science, 335(6076), 1545.
Gayles, J. G., & Ampaw, F. (2014). The impact of college experiences on degree completion in STEM fields at four-year institutions: Does gender matter? The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 439–468.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437–469.
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, L. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700.
Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.-B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college STEM majors. Science, 341, 1455–1456.
Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.010
Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. (1984). Out of the classroom: A chilly campus climate for women? Project on the status and education of women. Washington, DC: Association of American College.
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., … Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
Hardin, E. E., & Longhurst, M. O. (2016). Understanding the gender gap: Social cognitive changes during an introductory STEM course. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000119
Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.
Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 79–91.
Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of literature. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439
Herrara, F.A. & Hurtado, S. (2011). Maintaining initial interests: Developing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career interests among underrepresented racial minority students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA.
Hills, J. (1965). Transfer shock: The academic performance of the transfer student. The Journal of Experimental Education., 33(3), 201–215.
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). To choose sciences: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programs. Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186–215.
Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173. Retrieved 10/13/2006 from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/108069556
Hurtado, S., Eagan, K., & Chang, M. (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., & Hughes, B. (2012). Priming the pump or the sieve: Institutional contexts and URM STEM degree attainments. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Hyde, M. S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2000). Adjusting education practice to increase female persistence in the sciences. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(4), 335–355.
Islam, M. M., & Al-Ghassani, A. (2015). Predicting college math success: Do high school performance and gender matter? Evidence from Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p67
Jackson, D. L. (2013). Making the connection: The impact of support systems on female transfer students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The Community College Enterprise., 19(1), 19–33.
Jaeger, A. J., Eagan, M. K., & Wirt, L. G. (2008). Retaining students in science, math, and engineering majors: Rediscovering cooperative education. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 42(1), 20–32.
Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805–821.
Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E., & Villarejo, M. (2010). The importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 82–115.
Kim, M. M., Rhoades, G., & Woodard, D. B. (2003). Sponsored research versus graduating students? Intervening variables and unanticipated findings in public research universities. Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 51–81.
Kochhar, R., & Cilluffo, A. (2018). Income inequality in the U.S. is rising most rapidly among Asians. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/07/12/income-inequality-in-the-u-s-isrising-most-rapidly-among-asians/
Kokkelenberg, E. C., & Sinha, E. (2010). Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 935–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.016
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Laursen, S. L., Hunter, A.-B., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
LeBeau, B., Harwell, M., Monson, D., Dupuis, D., Medhanie, A., & LeBeau, T. R. (2012). Student and high school characteristics related to completing a science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) major in college. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(1), 17–28.
Lee, Y.-G., & Ferrare, J. J. (2019). Finding one’s place or losing the race? The consequences of STEM departure for college dropout and degree completion. The Review of Higher Education., 43(1), 221–261.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021276
Litzler, E., & Young, J. (2012). Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(2), 319–345.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907.
Manis, J., Sloat, B. F., Thomas, N. G., & Davis, C.-S. (1989). An analysis of factors affecting choices of majors in science, mathematics, and engineering at the University of Michigan. Michigan, MI: Center for Continuing Education of Women, University of Michigan.
McLelland, L. (1993). Students entering science, mathematics and engineering majors as fall freshmen, 1980–1988. Unpublished data provided by L. McLelland, Director, Office of Research and information, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Merton, P., Froyd, J. E., Clark, M. C., & Richardson, J. (2009). A case study of relationships between organizational culture and curricular change in engineering education. Innovative Higher Education, 34(4), 219–233.
Morrison, C., & Williams, L. E. (1993). Minority engineering programs: A case for institutional support. NACME Research Letter, 4(1), 1–11.
Mortenson, T. (1995, January 26–29). Financial opportunity for post-secondary education. Paper to the NACME Research and Policy Conference: Minorities in mathematics, science and engineering. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Museus, S. D., Agbayani, A., & Chang, D. M. (Eds.) (2016). Focusing on the underserved: Immigrant, refugee, and indigenous Asian-American and Pacific Islanders in Higher Education. University of Hawai’i, Information Age Publishing
Museus, S. D., & Liverman, D. (2010). High-performing institutions and their implications for studying underrepresented minority students in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 148, 17–27.
Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72.
Nasr, K., Pennington, J., & Andres, C. (2004). A study of students’ assessments of cooperative education outcomes. Journal of Cooperative Education, 38(1), 13–21.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways. National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Washington, DC: National Science Board.
National Center for Educational Statistics CIP User Site. (2019, May 1). Retrieved from: https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/browse.aspx?y=55
Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Shuman, L. J. (2010). Predicting STEM degree outcomes based on 8th grade data and standard test scores. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 209–223.
Nuwer, H. (2001). Wrongs of passage. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Nuwer, H. (2004). The hazing reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Report to the President) (130 p.). Executive Office of the President.
Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–208.
Ost, B. (2010). The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the sciences. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011
Packard, B. W. (2005). Mentoring and retention in college science: Reflections on the sophomore year. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(3), 289–300.
Palmer, R. T., Maramba, D. C., & Dancy, T. E. (2011). A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. The Journal of Negro Education, 81(4), 491–504.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Perna, L., Lundy-Wagner, V., Drezner, N. D., Gasman, M., Yoon, S., Bose, E., & Gary, S. (2009). The contributions of HBCUs to the preparation of African-American women for STEM careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education, 50, 1–23.
Porter, O. (1990). Undergraduate completion and persistence at four-year colleges and universities: Completers, persisters, stop-outs and drop-outs. Washington, DC: National Institute of Independent Colleges and Universities.
Price, J. (2010). The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 901–910.
QSR International (2016). NVivo 10.0. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/what-is-nvivo
Rask, K. (2010). Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013
Reich, D. (2011, November 9). Why engineering majors change their minds. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/danreich/2011/11/09/why-engineering-majors-change-their-minds/
Reyes, M. (2011). Unique challenges for women of color in STEM transferring from community colleges to universities. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 241–262.
Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664.
Rodriguez, C., Kirshstein, R., Amos, L., Jones, W., Espinosa, L., & Watnick, D. (2012). Broadening participation IN STEM: A call to action. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female-friendly science: Applying women’s study methods and theories to attract students. New York, NY: Pergamon.
Rotberg, I. (1990). Sources and reality: The participation of minorities in science and engineering education. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 358–361.
Rothwell, J. (2013). The hidden STEM economy: Metropolitan policy program at brookings institution. Retrieved April, 2015, from http//www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2013/06/10-stem-economy-rothwell/thehiddenstemeconomy610.pdf
Salzman, H. (2013). What shortage? The real evidence about the STEM workforce. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(4). Retrieved from http://issues.org/29-4/what-shortgae-th-real-evidence-about-the-stem-workforce/
Science editorial. (1992). Minorities in science: The pipeline problem. Science, 285(5085), 1175.
Seidel, J. V., Kjolseth, J. R., & Seymour, E. (1988). The ethnograph: A user’s guide. Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.
Seymour, E., & DeWelde, C. (2016). Why doesn’t knowing change anything? Constraints and resistance, leverage and sustainability (with K. De Welde). In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.
Seymour, E., & Fry, C. F. (2016). The Reformers’ Tale: Determining progress in improving undergraduate STEM education. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.
Shi, R. (2011, November 16). An alternative to grade inflation. The Daily Texan. Retrieved from http://www.dailytexanonline.com/opinion/2011/11/16/alternative-grade-inflation
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.
Strayhorn, T. L., Long, L. L., Kitchen, J. A., Williams, M. S., & Stentz, M. E. (2013). Academic and social barriers to Black and Latino male collegians' success in engineering and related STEM fields. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Engineering Education.
Suresh, R. (2007). The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 8(2), 215–239.
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144.
Tate, E. D., & Linn, M. C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology., 14(5/6), 483–493.
Taylor, T. (2011, November 14). Grade inflation and choice of major [Web log post: The conversable economist]. Retrieved from http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2011/11/grade-inflation-and-choice-of-major.html
Tinto, V. (1975, Winter). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don’t. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
U S Department of Education. (2014). 2013–2014 civil rights data collection: Key data insights on equity and opportunity gaps in our nation’s public schools. Washington DC: Office for Civil Rights.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Walczyk, J. J., Ramsey, L. L., & Zha, P. (2007). Obstacles to instructional innovation according to college science and mathematics faculty. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 85–106.
Whalen, D. F., & Shelley, M. C. (2010). Academic success for STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of STEM Education, 11(1–2), 45–60.
Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities s: A case study in progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 7–14.
Zhang, Y., & Allen, T. O. (2015). Challenges and support: Transfer experiences of community college engineering students. Journal of Applied Research in Community College, 22(1), 43–50.