Skip to main content

Then and Now: Summary and Implications

  • 1419 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout this book, we seek to answer a number of related questions: What are the rates of loss from STEM majors, which students leave, why, when, and how do they leave, and with what consequences, where do they go, and what enables those who stay to persist? In answering these questions, we also discuss what has, and has not, changed since the original study, both in the extent of persistence, loss, and relocation from undergraduate STEM majors, and in what contributes to these patterns. We also comment on what we might have previously overlooked, and what new issues have emerged in the socio-economic context in which higher education now operates. In this final chapter, we summarize our answers to these questions and discuss their implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_13
  • Chapter length: 37 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-25304-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Andrews, G. J. (1997). Workshop evaluation: Old myths and new wisdom. In J. A. Fleming (Ed.), New perspectives on designing and implementing effective workshops (pp. 71–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), eaau4734. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau473

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001). National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. R., & Millar, S. B. (2006). Using educational workshops to improve instruction in STEM courses. Metropolitan Universities, 17(4), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000138

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056–1063.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eagan, K., Hurtado, S., Figueroa, T., & Hughes, B. E. (2014). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One, 11(7), e0157447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrare, J. J. (2019). A multi-institutional analysis of instructional beliefs and practices in gateway courses to the sciences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 18(2), ar26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrare, J. J., & Miller, J. (2019). Making sense of persistence in scientific purgatory: A multi-institutional analysis of instructors in introductory STEM courses. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1602392

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hilsen, L. R., & Wadsworth, E. C. (2002). Staging successful workshops. In K. H. Gillespie (Ed.), A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources. Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-G., & Ferrare, J. J. (2019). Finding one’s place or losing the race? The consequences of STEM departure for college dropout and degree completion. The Review of Higher Education, 43(1), 221–261.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rask, K. (2010). Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane, I. W. (2012, July–August). Effortless perfection. The Undergraduate. Harvard Magazine, 55–56. Retrieved from http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/07/effortless-perfection

  • Seymour, E. (2001). Tracking the process of change in U.S. undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86, 79–105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., Melton, G., Pedersen-Gallegos, L., & Wiese, D. J. (2005). Partners in Innovation: Teaching assistants in college science courses. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & DeWelde, C. (2016). Why doesn’t knowing change anything? Constraints and resistance, leverage and sustainability. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Fry, C. F. (2016). The reformers’ tale: Determining progress in improving undergraduate STEM education. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, L. V., Randall, E. T., Bryant, F. B., Conley, C. S., & Bohnert, A. M. (2015). The cost of perfection with apparent ease: Theoretical foundations and development of the effortless perfectionism scale. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication., 27(4), 1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000109

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. C., Burgess, W. D., Childress, A. L., & Slakey, L. (2016). Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, C. (2003, September 23). Committee unveils Women’s Initiative report. The Chronicle. Retrieved from http://dukechronicle.com/article/committee-unveils-womens-initiative-report

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine Seymour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seymour, E. (2019). Then and Now: Summary and Implications. In: Seymour, E., Hunter, AB. (eds) Talking about Leaving Revisited. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25303-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25304-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)