Abstract
Recently, it is becoming increasingly important to establish and utilize desirable inter-organizational relationship in the broadcasting contents industry. This study examined benefit sharing between organizations as a way to strengthen competitiveness in terms of co-evolution through inter-organizational relations in the Korea’s broadcasting contents industry. Especially, it attempted an exploratory approach to identify the current status of benefit sharing (especially in terms of revenue sharing) between OTT (Over The Top), a new distributor, and Content Providers (CPs) and ways of benefit sharing, as well as the relationship between traditional TV broadcasters and CPs. The study also dealt with the issue of benefit sharing for co-evolution through discussion of the typology of benefit sharing, including OTT, which represents the new broadcasting contents market structure. In addition, the study also presented its limitations and proposed a direction for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
MG: Minimum Guarantee/RS: Revenue Sharing.
- 2.
Terrestrial broadcasters are paying more attention to topicality than viewing rates, increasing the production of such programs as School Attack 2018, Dancing High, Visiting Teacher, After School Hip-Hop, and High School Rapper 2.
- 3.
While it is not known how an RS contract involving broadcasting contents is usually concluded, in the case of movie contents, which is the same video content as broadcasting content, a flat contract is concluded based on estimation of sales expected to be generated within the contract period, reflecting anticipated sales amount or some 1.5 times that [8].
- 4.
For information on detailed contract types, please refer to the section entitled ‘2) Issue of Traditional Revenue Sharing.’
- 5.
Currently, OTT service can be classified into broadcasting content-type and original content-type. Yet, as shown in the main body, original content production is becoming more and more important, rendering any attempt to the classification of service types pointless.
References
Korea Creative Contect Agency: <2017 Broadcasting industry white paper> (2018)
Noh, M.S.: A study on the utilization status and policy tasks for SMEs’ Sharing System. Wage Information Brief 2(3), 11–15 (2018)
Lee, S.H.: Current situation and prospect of broadcasting contents in Korea towards the changing circumstances of broadcasting market. Focus 28(8), 1–17 (2016)
Baek, S.H., Byun, S.K., Kim, G.J.: Broadcasting contents market and profit distribution model. Korean J. Broadcast. Telecommun. Stud. 29(1), 63–92 (2015)
Baek, S.H., Kim, G.J.: An exploratory study on the fair trade and profit structure of broadcasting contents. Korean J. Broadcasting Telecommun. Stud. (2013). (Regular academic conferences in spring, in Busan)
Korea Communications Commission.: The competitive Broadcasting Market Situation Assessment (2017)
Jeon, B.S.: OTT service at the center of the global media market. Broadcast. Trend Insight 14 (2018)
Kim, Y.K., Nam, S.H.: An Study on Films in the Digital Online Market Structure Analysis. Korean film Council (2016)
Acknowledgements
“This research was supported by the Academic Research fund of Hoseo University in 2017” (2017-0071).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baek, SH., Park, MG., Zhang, JH., Lee, JH. (2020). An Exploratory Study on the Benefit Sharing of Broadcasting Content Industry. In: Lee, R. (eds) Computer and Information Science. ICIS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 849. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25213-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25213-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25212-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25213-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)