Skip to main content

Waismann in the Vienna Circle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Friedrich Waismann

Part of the book series: History of Analytic Philosophy ((History of Analytic Philosophy))

  • 261 Accesses

Abstract

Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau provides us with a history of Waismann’s time in the Vienna Circle. Waismann is often taken to have reported Wittgenstein’s ideas to the Circle. Limbeck-Lilienau however stresses that these reports not only shaped central discussions within the Circle, mainly between him and Rudolf Carnap, but that Waismann’s contributions went beyond mere reporting in trying to improve upon the philosophical outlook emerging from the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The paper works out the conflict between Waismann’s and Carnap’s views on language and physicalism and documents its uptake in Waismann’s Principles of Linguistic Philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The minutes of the discussions from 1930–1931 are published in Stadler (2015, 75–123). Some transcripts of Waismann’s talks in the Circle are preserved in the Carnap Papers (Pittsburgh) and the Waismann Papers (Oxford).

  2. 2.

    See the introductions to McGuinness (1979), Baker (2003) and the papers in McGuinness (2011).

  3. 3.

    Höfler published a handbook on logic in 1922, which gave a detailed exposition of Russell’s logic from the Principia Mathematica. Before Word War I, Höfler was also a mentor of Otto Neurath, Hans Hahn and Philipp Frank. Still in 1933, Waismann gave a course on one of Höfler’s books on logic. On Höfler, see Blackmore (2017).

  4. 4.

    Waismann Papers (Oxford), A 1–2.

  5. 5.

    These courses were kind of unofficial; they were always announced as Schlick’s seminars (“Schlicks Proseminar”), despite the fact that Waismann gave them alone.

  6. 6.

    In 1924, Ramsey met Hahn several times and once also Schlick. About these meetings, see Misak (2020).

  7. 7.

    On Ramsey’s role in Carnap’s adoption of simple type theory in 1929, see Reck (2004, 164–166). On Carnap’s later opposition to Ramsey’s version of logicism, see Goldfarb (2009, 110–114).

  8. 8.

    On the controversy about identity between Wittgenstein and Ramsey in 1927, see Sullivan (1995).

  9. 9.

    The talks have been preserved through the notes of Carnap. I quote from these notes (Carnap Papers, RC 102-76-10).

  10. 10.

    He explicitly stated the principle in an outline for a course, probably from 1929/1930 (preserved in the Carnap Papers, RC 102-76-13). Wittgenstein expressed that principle, although in a different form in Philosophical Remarks written between February 1929 and April 1930 (Wittgenstein 1964, § 43). Wittgenstein also stated the principle in the same words as Waismann in his Cambridge lecture from 1931/1932 (Lee 1980, C I).

  11. 11.

    Tarski gave several lectures on his conception of meta-mathematics in Vienna in February 1930, which greatly influenced Carnap. Carnap’s and Neurath’s first talks on physicalism also date from 1930. See Uebel (2007).

  12. 12.

    See Carnap Papers, RC 102-76-10.

  13. 13.

    The Koenigsberg Conference is famous for Gödel’s first public announcement of his results on incompleteness. Besides the talks by Carnap and Waismann at that conference, John von Neumann presented the position of formalism and Arend Heyting the intuitionist view.

  14. 14.

    Especially the interpretation of identity and the status of such axioms as the axiom of infinity.

  15. 15.

    See the “Protocols of the Schlick Circle” from 1931 (Stadler 2015, 81).

  16. 16.

    Waismann’s tolerant attitude towards freely chosen “logical syntaxes”, a position he adopted much earlier than Carnap, would need a separate treatment as well as a comparison with Carnap’s later view on logical syntax. This cannot be done here for reasons of space.

  17. 17.

    On the role of internal relations in Wittgenstein’s conception of meaning and representation, see Hacker (1996, 31) and Crane (2010).

  18. 18.

    Waismann in his course from 1932 on “Thinking, Meaning, Intention”, Schlick Papers, 078/B.60.

Bibliography

  • Awodey, Steve, and André Carus. 2009. From Wittgenstein’s Prison to the Boundless Ocean: Carnap’s Dream of Logical Syntax. In Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language, ed. Pierre Wagner, 79–106. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Gordon (ed.). 2003. The Voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna Circle. Waismann and Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, Thomas. 2017. Alois Höfler (1853–1922). In The School of Alexius Meinong, ed. Liliana Albertazzi, Dale Jacquette, and Roberto Poli, 157–187. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 1928a. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis Verlag. English edition The Logical Structure of the World, trans. Rolf A. George, 2003. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 1928b. Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie. Berlin: Weltkreis Verlag. English edition Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. Rolf A. George, 2003. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. forthcoming. Tagebücher 1908–1935, ed. Christian Damböck. Transcriptions by Brigitta Arden and Brigitte Parakenings, Editorial collaboration by Roman Jordan and Lois M. Rendl. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Tim. 2010. Wittgenstein on Intentionality. Harvard Review of Philosophy 17: 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, Herbert. 1981. The Wiener Kreis in America. In Herbert Feigl: Inquiries and Refutations. Selected Writings, 1929–1974, ed. Robert S. Cohen, 57–94. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, Warren. 2009. Carnap’s Syntax Programme and the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language, ed. Pierre Wagner, 109–120. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, Peter M.S. 1996. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Desmond (ed.). 1980. Wittgenstein’s Lectures. Cambridge 1930–1932: From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Brian. 1979. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Brian. 2011. Friedrich Waismann—Causality and Logical Positivism. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Misak, Cheryl. 2020. Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank. 1925. The Foundations of Mathematics. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25: 338–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reck, Erich. 2004. From Frege and Russell to Carnap: Logic and Logicism in the 1920s. In Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena, ed. Steve Awodey and Carsten Klein. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1910–1913. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1921. The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz. 1959. The Turning Point in Philosophy. In Logical Positivism, ed. Alfred J. Ayer, 53–59. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz. 1985. General Theory of Knowledge, trans. Albert Blumberg. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz. 2013. Vorrede [zu Waismann]. In Moritz Schlick. Erkenntnistheoretische Schriften 1926–1936, ed. Johannes Friedl and Heiner Rutte. Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Friedrich, and Thomas Uebel (eds.). 2012. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis (1929). Reprint of the First Edition. Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Friedrich. 2015. The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Peter M. 1995. Wittgenstein on ‘The Foundations of Mathematics’, June 1927. Theoria 61 (2): 105–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uebel, Thomas. 2007. Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1928. The Nature of the Axiom of Reducibility. In Friedrich Waismann: Philosophical Papers, ed. Brian McGuinness, 1977. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1930. The Logical Analysis of the Concept of Probability. In Friedrich Waismann: Philosophical Papers, ed. Brian McGuinness, 1977. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1936a. The Concept of Identity. In Friedrich Waismann: Philosophical Papers, ed. Brian McGuinness, 1977. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1936b. Einführung in das mathematische Denken. Vienna: Gerold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1939. What Is Logical Analysis? In Friedrich Waismann: Philosophical Papers, ed. Brian McGuinness, 1977. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1976. Logik, Sprache, Philosophie. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1964. Philosophical Remarks, ed. Rush Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Archival Sources

  • From the Carnap Papers, Archive of Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh:

    Google Scholar 

  • Notes on Friedrich Waismann’s Lectures on Wittgenstein’s Philosophy, 1930, RC 102-76-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Waismann, Leitsätze zum Proseminar I”, RC 102-76-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • From the Schlick Papers, Noord-Hollands Archief, Haarlem:

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1929/1930. “Die Philosophie ist keine Lehre sondern ein Tun”. Schlick- Proseminar. 070/B.51-1 and 071/B.53. (I thank Juha Manninen for a transcription of parts of the seminar protocol.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. 1932. “Über ‘Denken’, ‘Meinen’, ‘Intention’” [On ‘Thinking’, ‘Meaning’, ‘Intention’]. Schlick-Proseminar. 078/B.60.

    Google Scholar 

  • From the Waismann Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford:

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. “Über das Wesen der Philosophie und ihre Aufgabe” [On the Nature of Philosophy and its Function], A1 and A2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Limbeck-Lilienau, C. (2019). Waismann in the Vienna Circle. In: Makovec, D., Shapiro, S. (eds) Friedrich Waismann. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25008-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics