Empirical Evidence of Persistent Institutional Duality in Ukraine

  • Alberto Veira-RamosEmail author
  • Evgenii Golovakha


The authors present results from the Ukrainian Society survey showing (1) changes over time in the level of trust in the “new” democratic institutions, (2) changes in the rates of approval and satisfaction with the performance of elected officials, (3) empirical evidence of persistent institutional duality among large shares of the Ukrainian population and (4) the portrait of a society with a weak middle class, still unconvinced of the existence of social lifts based on meritocratic principles open to all and uncertain about its future but increasingly aware of the need for reforms. Ukrainians seem persuaded that a free market economy can bring economic development but fear unemployment and inflation. Thus, large shares of Ukrainians remain inclined to support a paternalistic-type of state.


Ukraine Institutional trust Institutional duality Economic reforms Institutional reforms Paternalism Meritocracy Social lifts (mobility) 


  1. Buzuluk, O. (2018). Uniform and reform: How has the patrol police changed in two years? Retrieved April 5, 2019 from
  2. Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Golovakha, E., Kostenko, N., & Makieiev, S. (Eds.). (2014). Obschestro bez dovieriya [Society without trust]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.Google Scholar
  4. Golovakha, E., & Panina, N. (1994). The development of a democratic political identity in contemporary Ukrainian political culture. In R. F. Farnen (Ed.), Nationalism, ethnicity, and identity (pp. 403–422). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, I. (2005). Political trust in societies under transformation: A comparative analysis of Poland and Ukraine. International Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kovriga, A. (2001). Urban management and local government as new institutions in the new Ukraine. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kulyk, V. (2016). National identity in Ukraine: Impact of Euromaidan and the war. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peacock, R., & Cordner, G. (2016). “Shock therapy” in Ukraine: A radical approach to post-Soviet police reform. Public Administration and Development, 36(1), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Riabchuk, M. (2015). “Two Ukraines” reconsidered: The end of Ukrainian ambivalence? Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 15(1), 138–156.Google Scholar
  10. Savchenko, T., & Kovacs, L. (2017). Trust in the banking sector: EU experience and evidence from Ukraine. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shulman, S. (2005). National identity and public support for political and economic reform in Ukraine. Slavic Review, 64(1), 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Söderlund, P. (2017). Trust in politicians across countries and over time. Retrieved April 15, 2019 from
  13. Wallace, C., & Latcheva, R. (2006). Economic transformation outside the law: Corruption, trust in public institutions and the informal economy in transition countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wolczuk, K. (2002). Catching up with ‘Europe’? Constitutional debates on the territorial-administrative model in independent Ukraine. Regional & Federal Studies, 12(2), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carlos III UniversityMadridSpain
  2. 2.Institute of SociologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations