Skip to main content

National Parks as Water Sources: Does Governance Contribute to Their Conservation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Availability and Management in Mexico

Abstract

Natural protected areas (NPA) were enacted with the purpose of conserving the biodiversity they shed, and also for maintaining the environmental service related to aquifer recharge. Within the NPA, the emphasis has been given to the creation of national parks because most of them are located in high mountains whereas water sources originate. Within a region, mountains discharge can represent up to 95% of the basin total amount of runoff. The importance of high mountains as water sources manifested in the 1930s, most of them were declared as national parks, due to the pressure to land-use change. In a survey sent to directors of seventeen Mexican national parks, it was found out that water supply to the downstream towns, was one of the most valuable services national parks provide. Supply that ,however, is threatened by the pollution of the water sources, drought due to climate change, and overall, by the lack of coordination among the multiple levels of governance to allocate economic, political, and legal resources national parks demand to comply with the purposes they were decreed to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arriaga CL, Aguilar V, Espinoza JA (2009) Regiones prioritarias y planeación para la conservación de la biodiversidad. In: Sarukhán J (ed) Capital natural de México, vol II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. CONABIO, México, pp 433–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont J (1997) Community participation in the establishment and management of marine protected areas: a review of selected international experience. S Afr J Mar Sci 18:333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breña PAF, Breña NJA (2007) Disponibilidad de agua en el futuro de México. Recuperado de https://www.amc.edu.mx/revistaciencia/images/revista/58_3/PDF/09-550.pdf

  • Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP) (2017) Áreas Naturales Protegidas Decretadas. Recuperado de http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/datos_anp.htm

  • Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA) (2016) Atlas del agua en México 2016. SEMARNAT y CONAGUA, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA) (2017) Estadísticas del agua en México 2017. SEMARNAT y CONAGUA, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional del Agua y Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (CONAGUA-SEMARNAT) (2016) Estadísticas del agua en México. CONAGUA-SEMARNAT, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO) (2012). Proyección de la población 2010–2050. Recuperado de http://www.conapo.gob.mx/en/CONAPO/Proyecciones

  • Denniston D (1996) Overview: people and mountains. People Planet 5:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinez MJ, Van der Zaag P, Van Cauwenbergh N (2018) A half-baked solution: drivers of water crises in Mexico. Int Assoc Hydrol Sci 376:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pompa A, Dirzo R (1995) Las reservas de la biosfera y otras áreas naturales protegidas de México. SEMARNAP y CONABIO, México

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ocampo A, Rodríguez-Quiróz R, Ortega-Rubio A (2015) Una revisión panorámica de las Áreas Protegidas de México. 2015. In Ortega–Rubio A, Pinkus-Rendón MJ, Espitia-Moreno IC (eds) Las Áreas Naturales Protegidas y la Investigación Científica en México. Red Áreas Naturales Protegidas; Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C.; Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán Centro de Investigaciones Regionales Unidad de Ciencias Sociales y Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, México, pp 67–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T (2003) Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century, a discussion paper. Institute on Governance in collaboration with Parks Canada and the Canadian International Development Agency, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2016a) Zona Económica Exclusiva. Recuperado de http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/hipertexto/zona_economica.htm

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2016b) Banco de información económica. Cuentas Nacionales. Producto Interno Bruto por Entidad Federativa, Base 2013. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/

  • Ives JD, Messerli B, Spiess E (1997) Mountains of the world: a global priority, in mountains of the world: a global priority. Parthenon Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane MB (2001) Affirming new directions in planning theory: Co-management of protected areas. Society and Natural Resources 14:657–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R (1998) Los nuevos desafíos de la teoría de la governance. Recuperado de ecaths1.s3.amazonaws.com/agypp/616839472.mayntz_nuevos_desafios.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Monterroso AI, Gómez JD, Tinoco JA (2008) Propuesta metodológica de inclusión de evaluación de impactos del cambio climático en la ordenación del territorio. Asociación Española de Climatología, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO) (2000) Año Internacional de Montañas. FAO, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO) (2005) El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación 2005. FAO, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto J (2017) Hacia la Sostenibilidad de los Parques Nacionales: Análisis de su Gestión y Modelo de Gobernanza. Universidad de Extremadura, Departamento de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad, España

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelas L, Chávez M, Barradas ML, Miranda A, García L (2010) Capítulo 9. Uso Ecológico. In: Jiménez B, Torregrosa M, Aboites L (eds) El agua en México: cauces y encauces. Academia Mexicana de Ciencias, México, pp 237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott CA, Banister JM (2008) The dilemma of water management “Regionalization” in Mexico under centralized resource allocation. Int J Water Resour Dev 24:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales y Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (SEMARNAT-CONANP) (2011) Programas de Manejo de las Áreas Naturales Protegidas de México. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/conanp/acciones-y-programas/programas-de-manejo

  • Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, MacKinnon K, Whitten T, Leverington F (2007) Reporting progress in protected areas. A site level management effectiveness tracking tool, 2nd edn. World Bank/WWF Forest Alliance and WWF, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann S, O’Riordan T (2002) From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: experience from Germany and South Africa. Soc Nat Resour 15:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Panos Institute (2002) High-stakes: the future of mountain societies. The Panos Institute, Londres

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovar J, Aranda M, Rivera J (2006) El Parque Nacional Desierto de Los Leones. In: Tovar J, Valenzuela R (eds) Los hongos del Parque Nacional Desierto de Los Leones. Primer espacio de conservación biológica en México. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente. Gobierno del Distrito Federal, México, pp 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos I (2000) Áreas naturales protegidas: instrumento estratégico para la conservación de la biodiversidad. Gaceta Ecológica 54:24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviroli D, Weingartner R (2004) The hydrological significance of mountains: from regional to global scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8(6):1016–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) (2003) Durban action plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (WEF) (2011) Water security: the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Organization (1992) Agenda 21. UNO, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by CONACYT through a scholarship granted to H. Narave-Flores. Authors thank Dr. Ricardo Santes Alvarez, professor/researcher of the Northern Border College for the revision of the manuscript first draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Celina Ruelas-Monjardín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruelas-Monjardín, L.C., Narave-Flores, H.V., Dávalos-Sotelo, R. (2020). National Parks as Water Sources: Does Governance Contribute to Their Conservation?. In: Otazo-Sánchez, E., Navarro-Frómeta, A., Singh, V. (eds) Water Availability and Management in Mexico. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 88. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24962-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics