This chapter illustrates why and how the existing theoretical models in the study of ethnopolitics need to be updated in light of the latest developments and the increasing impact of new catalysts. These are, namely, anti-immigration and the rise of the populist and radical right across Central and Eastern Europe. This chapter hints that the more systematic cooperation between academic experts in nationalism and academic experts in the populist and radical right will enable: (a) the former to assess more accurately the degree to which new variables such as Euroscepticism and anti-immigrant trends can reshape ethnopolitics, both as a living reality and a field of study, across Central and Eastern Europe; (b) the latter to formulate new interpretative models about how (right-wing) populist and Eurosceptic actors embed their agendas inside the pre-existing political cultures of nationalism and particularistic identity and memory politics. This chapter introduces and outlines the ethnosymbolic approach as well as the triadic and quadratic configurations of ethnopolitics. Then, it proceeds into a more empirical assessment of the applicability of these theoretical approaches in a series of case studies during the 1990s, as well as the more recent emergence of new catalysts and the ensuing necessity to update and upgrade the existing theoretical models.
- Far right
- Central and Eastern Europe
This piece has been authored courtesy of an individual research fellowship, as part of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions (Horizon 2020 - project name: 749400-MERWBKBS).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
For instance, nineteenth century Greek intellectuals (Adamantios Koraes, in particular) bewailed the degeneration of their contemporary Greeks in comparison to the underlying genius of their community, as revealed in its purest form during the golden age of Periclean Athens (fifth century BC).
On some occasions, the need for the regeneration of the community may acquire rather mystical and semi-religious dimensions. A notable example is the notion of the ‘Serbian Golgotha’ in Serbian nationalist imagery. On this issue, see Tomašić (1948: 30).
An appropriate example of this kind is certain British state rituals (e.g. Remembrance Day).
For example, Mao Tse-tung frequently stressed the ‘family ties’ among the Chinese people, and their descent from a common ancestor (Huang-ti, the legendary first emperor of China).
This project largely consisted in tentative portrayals of the war in southeast Ukraine as a conflict between ‘neo-Fascists’ (i.e. the post-Maidan Ukrainian government) and ‘anti-Fascists’ (i.e. the Donbas separatists). On this issue, see the relevant excerpts of Vladimir Putin’s Crimean speech (18 March 2014) at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603.
Presidency Conclusions, Copenhagen European Council (1993, p. 7.A.iii), available online at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/ec/pdf/cop_en.pdf (accessed 10 June 2018). Also, see http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/enlargement_process/accession_process/criteria/index_en.htm (accessed 10 June 2018).
On the Hungarian case and the party of Jobbik (Movement for a Better Hungary), see: Kovarek et al. (2017: 63–87). For the party’s official position, see: ‘Immigration increases tensions in Europe’ (https://www.jobbik.com/immigration_increases_tensions_europe) (accessed 12 June 2018).
Allen, T. J. (2017). All in the party-family? Comparing far-right voters in Western and post-Communist Europe. Party Politics, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815593457.
Annus, E. (2012). The problem of Soviet Colonialism in the Baltics. Journal of Baltic Studies, 43(1), 21–45.
Björkman-Bennich, L., & Johansson, K. M. (2012). Explaining moderation in nationalism: Divergent trajectories of national conservative parties in Estonia and Latvia. Comparative European Politics (online version). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.28.
Braghiroli, S., & Petsinis, V. (2019). Between party-systems and identity-politics: The populist and radical right in Estonia and Latvia. European Politics and Society (online version). https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1569340.
Brubaker, R. (1995). National minorities, nationalizing states and external homelands in the New Europe. Daedalus, 124(2), 107–132.
Brubaker, R. (2002). Ethnicity without groups. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, XLIII(2), 163–189.
Brubaker, R., Loveman, M., & Stamatov, P. (2004). Ethnicity as cognition. Theory and Society, 33, 31–64.
Brubaker, R., Feischmidt, M., Fox, J., & Grancea, L. (2008). Nationalist politics and everyday ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Bruszt, L., & Stark, D. (2003). Who counts? Supranational norms and societal needs. East European Politics and Societies, 17(1), 74–82.
Budryte, D. (2005). Taming nationalism? Political community building in the Post-Soviet Baltic States. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bustikova, L. (2015). The democratization of hostility: Minorities and radical right actors after the fall of Communism. In M. Minkenberg (Ed.), Transforming the transformation. New York: Routledge.
Bustikova, L. (2018). The radical right in Eastern Europe. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the radical right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Connor, W. (1993). Ethnonationalism: A quest for understanding. London: Routledge.
Danforth, L. (1997). The Macedonian conflict: Ethnic nationalism in a transnational world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
EKRE. (2015). Riigikogu 2015. https://ekre.ee/riigikogu-2015/. Accessed June 7, 2018.
Flood, C., & Usherwood, S. (2005). Positions, dispositions, transitions: A model of group alignment on EU Integration. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, University of Leeds, 5–7 April 2005.
Haughton, T. (2007). When does the EU make a difference? Conditionality and the accession process in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review, 5, 233–246.
Jubulis, M. (2001). Nationalism and Democratic Transition: The Politics of Citizenship and Language in Post-Soviet Latvia. University Press of America.
Kasekamp, A., Madison, M., & Wierenga, L. (2018, April). Discursive opportunities for the Estonian populist radical right in a digital society. Problems of Post-Communism (online version). https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1445973.
Kelley, J. (2004). Ethnic politics in Europe: The power of norms and incentives. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kluknavská, A., & Smolik, J. (2016). We hate them all? Issue adaptation of extreme right parties in Slovakia 1993–2016. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49(4), 335–344.
Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The two sides of Euroscepticism: Party positions on European Integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297–326.
Kovarek, D., Róna, B., Hunyadi, B., & Krekó, P. (2017). Scapegoat-based policy-making in Hungary: Qualitative evidence for how Jobbik and its Mayors govern municipalities. Intersections, 3(3), 63–87.
Mach, Z. (1989). Symbols, conflict and identity. Krakow: Krakow University Press.
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pappas, T. (2018). How to tell nativists from populists. Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 148–152.
Peiker, P. (2016). Estonian nationalism through the postcolonial lens. Journal of Baltic Studies, 47(1), 113–132.
Pettai, V. (2006). Explaining ethnic politics in the Baltic States: Reviewing THE Triadic nexus model. Journal of Baltic Studies, 37(1), 124–136.
Pytlas, B. (2015). The populist radical right in Central and Eastern Europe: Ideology, impact, and electoral performance. London & New York: Routledge.
Smith, A. D. (1999). Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. D. (2000). The nation in history: Historiographical debates about ethnicity and nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. D. (2007). Nationalism: Theory, ideology, history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, D. (2002). Framing the national question in Central and Eastern Europe: A quadratic nexus? The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 2(1), 3–16.
Smith, D. (2003). Minority rights, multiculturalism, and EU-enlargement: The case of Estonia. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 1, 1–39.
Smooha, S. (2001). The Model of Ethnic Democracy. ECMI Working Papers (#13, October 2001), European Centre for Minority Issues, Flensburg.
Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33(3), 363–388.
Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2002). The party politics of Euroscepticism in EU member and candidate states. SEI Working Paper 51.
Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2008). Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomašić, D. (1948). Personality and culture in East European politics. New York: George W. Stewart Publisher Inc.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petsinis, V. (2020). Ethnopolitics Across Central and Eastern Europe in a State of Flux: Time for Updating and Upgrading?. In: Bogdanova, O., Makarychev, A. (eds) Baltic-Black Sea Regionalisms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24878-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24877-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24878-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)