Skip to main content

A Burden for the Common

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Quest for a Divided Welfare State
  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

How can private health insurance be as cheap as it is? At least for the young and the healthy, who get away with a rather low premium in spite of all guarantees and promises made by insurance companies. This chapter examines how insurance companies and their policyholders free ride on the public health system, and how prices therefore can be kept lower than would otherwise have been the case. One example is that policyholders come to premises where the rent is already being paid for by the public, i.e. by the taxpayers. Another example is that private health insurance customers can be treated by doctors who are paid by the public authorities. This is partly due to the increased possibilities of multiple jobholding or so-called moonlighting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adema, W. (1997). What do countries really spend on social policies? A comparative note. OECD Economic Studies,28(1), 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & Cuizon, D. (2004). Multiple public-private jobholding of health care providers in developing countries: An exploration of theory and evidence. Issue paper-private sector. London: Department for International Development Health Systems Resource Centre Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglaiser, G., & Albert Ma, C. T. (2007). Moonlighting: Public service and private practice. The RAND Journal of Economics,38(4), 1113–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, K., & Bir, A. (2006). Physician dual practice. Health Policy,78(2–3), 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlingsson, G. Ó., & Öhrvall, R. (2013). Kommunerna brister i hanteringen av anställdas bisysslor. under utgivning i Ekonomisk Debatt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980). Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S. (2002). The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenheimer, A. J., & Elvander, N. (Eds.) (1980). The shaping of the Swedish health system. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. M. (1990). Institutions, veto points, and policy results: A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy,10(4), 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (2014). The welfare state: A regulatory perspective. Public Administration,92(3), 599–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, N., Touzet, C., & Zemmour, M. (2018). Fiscal welfare in Europe: Why should we care and what do we know so far? Journal of European Social Policy,28(5), 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, J. D. (2010). Adapting the welfare state: Privatisation in health care in Denmark, England and Sweden. Doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seah, D. S., Cheong, T. Z., & Anstey, M. H. (2013). The hidden cost of private health insurance in Australia. Australian Health Review,37(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. A., Riordan, R. L., Fraser, K. L., Buchanan, J. D., & Goulston, K. J. (2006). The challenge of locum working arrangements in New South Wales public hospitals. Medical Journal of Australia,185(5), 276–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socha, K. Z., & Bech, M. (2011). Physician dual practice: A review of literature. Health Policy,102(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R. (1958). Essays on the welfare state. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R. D. (1982). Rent seeking: A survey. Kyklos,35(4), 575–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Lapidus .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lapidus, J. (2019). A Burden for the Common. In: The Quest for a Divided Welfare State. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24784-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24784-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24783-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24784-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics