Advertisement

Intervention and EUD

A Combination for Appropriating Automated Processes
  • Thomas Herrmann
  • Christopher LentzschEmail author
  • Martin Degeling
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11553)

Abstract

Intervention is a new concept for human-computer interaction to help users to cope with the increasing complexity of automated processes in socio-technical settings. We relate the paradigms of End-User Development with it and show the differences, commonalities and emergent areas through a theoretical analysis of a smart home setting. Implications for the design of intervention user interfaces are derived and the interplay of interventions with and their support of End-User Development is shown.

Keywords

End-user development Human-computer interaction Intervention Socio-technical systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Schmidt, A., Herrmann, T.: Intervention user interfaces: a new interaction paradigm for automated systems. Interactions 24, 40–45 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3121357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Klann, M., Wulf, V.: End-user development: an emerging paradigm. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development, vol. 9, pp. 1–8. Springer, Dordrecht (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fischer, G.: End-user development: from creating technologies to transforming cultures. In: Dittrich, Y., Burnett, M., Mørch, A., Redmiles, D. (eds.) IS-EUD 2013. LNCS, vol. 7897, pp. 217–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38706-7_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herrmann, T., Schmidt, A., Degeling, M.: From interaction to intervention: an approach for keeping humans in control in the context of socio-technical systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS development (STPIS 2018) Co-located with 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2018), Tallinn, Estonia, 12 June 2018, pp. 101–110 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111–134 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alam, M.R., Reaz, M.B.I., Ali, M.A.M.: A review of smart homes—past, present, and future. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 42, 1190–1203 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2012.2189204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balta-Ozkan, N., Davidson, R., Bicket, M., Whitmarsh, L.: Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. Energy Policy 63, 363–374 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., Hauxwell-Baldwin, R.: Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 19, 463–476 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cook, D.J., et al.: MavHome: an agent-based smart home. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2003), pp. 521–524. IEEE Computer Society, Fort Worth (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caivano, D., Fogli, D., Lanzilotti, R., Piccinno, A., Cassano, F.: Supporting end users to control their smart home: design implications from a literature review and an empirical investigation. J. Syst. Softw. 144, 295–313 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrmann, T.: Support of intervening use. In: Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems III, pp. 289–294. Elsevier (1992). https://www-imtm.iaw.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/sociotech-lit.php?file=Herr92-SoI.pdf
  12. 12.
    Schmidt, A.: Implicit human computer interaction through context. Pers. Technol. 4, 191–199 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rost, M., Bock, K.: Privacy by design and the new protection goals. European Privacy Seal (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Degeling, M.: Online Profiling - Analyse und Intervention zum Schutz von Privatheit (2016). https://duepublico.uni-due.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=42157
  15. 15.
    Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K.P., Loiseau, P., Mislove, A.: Investigating ad transparency mechanisms in social media: a case study of Facebook’s explanations. In: Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. Internet Society, San Diego (2018).  https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2018.23191
  16. 16.
    Alter, S.: Theory of workarounds. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 1041–1066 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03455
  17. 17.
    Pipek, V.: From Tailoring to Appropriation Support: Negotiating Groupware Usage Faculty of Science (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barricelli, B.R., Cassano, F., Fogli, D., Piccinno, A.: End-user development, end-user programming and end-user software engineering: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 149, 101–137 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischer, G., Fogli, D., Piccinno, A.: Revisiting and broadening the meta-design framework for end-user development. In: Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) New Perspectives in End-User Development, pp. 61–97. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bødker, S., Lyle, P.: Community end-user development: patterns, platforms, possibilities and problems. IS-EUD 2017, p. 76 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nardi, B.A.: A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End User Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heierman, E.O., Cook, D.J.: Improving home automation by discovering regularly occurring device usage patterns. In: Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 537–540. IEEE Computer Society, Melbourne (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ur, B., McManus, E., Pak Yong Ho, M., Littman, M.L.: Practical trigger-action programming in the smart home. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2014, pp. 803–812. ACM Press, Toronto (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Örtlund, R.: Evaluation of AEBS Real Life Performance - A Method for Using Limited Log Data Applied on Volvo Trucks (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Inagaki, T.: Technological and legal considerations for the design of interactions between human driver and advanced driver assistance systems. In: Proceedings of NeTWork Workshop: Control and Accountability in Highly Automated Systems (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fischer, G., Herrmann, T.: Meta-design: transforming and enriching the design and use of socio-technical systems. In: Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., Randall, D. (eds.) Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. CSCW, pp. 79–109. Springer, London (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ruhr-University of BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations