Advertisement

Utopia, Ideology, and Philosophy

  • Henrique Jales RibeiroEmail author
Chapter
  • 94 Downloads
Part of the Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress book series (NAHP, volume 11)

Abstract

In contrast to the vast literature on the relationships between philosophy and utopia, for which the latter is simply an object of the former, the author shows to what extent philosophy itself can be a matter of utopia, i.e., an essentially utopian discourse, while, on the other hand, being a discourse that can transform reality ideologically. The philosophy of science, from Descartes and Kant to the present, is the framework used to exemplify this new approach, starting with Karl Mannheim’s and Paul Ricoeur’s studies on utopia and its relationship with ideology. The central thesis is that the discourse on sciences has its seat in a “no-place” or a “nowhere”, which is the ideal laboratory for philosophic work, where sciences are reconstructed both epistemologically and ideologically.

References

  1. Althusser, Louis. 1974. Philosophie et philosophie spontannée des savants (1967). Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, Rudolf. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, Rudolf. 1956. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press (First published 1947).Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, Rudolf. 1966. Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, ed. M. Gardner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, Nancy, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck, and T.E. Uebel. 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassirer, Ernst. 1907. Kant und die moderne Mathematik. Kant-Studien 12: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Descartes, René. 1901. The Method, Meditations and Philosophy of Descartes, trans. J. Veitch. New York: Tudor Publishingm Co.Google Scholar
  8. Feyerabend, Paul. 1987. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Feyerabend, Paul. 2002. Against Method: Outline of an Anatchistic Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed. London: Verso (First published in 1975).Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, Michael. 1992. Philosophy and the Exact Sciences. In Inference, Explanations, and other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, ed. John Earman, 84–98. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hempel, Carl. 1952. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund. 1999. The Idea of Phenomenology, trans. W. P. Alston and G. Nakhnikian. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (First published in German in 1906).Google Scholar
  13. Jungnickel, Christa, and Russell McCormmach. 1990. Intellectual Mastery of Nature: Theoretical Physics from Ohm to Einstein: The Now Mighty Theoretical Physics: 1870–1925. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, Immanuel, 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. ed. and trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (First published in German in 1781).Google Scholar
  15. Koertge, Noretta. 1991. Ideology, Science and a Free Society. In Beyond Reason: Essays on the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend, ed. Gonzalo Munévar, 225–242. Dordrecht: Klüwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhn, Thomas. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (First published in 1962).Google Scholar
  18. Lakatos, Imre. 1978. Philosophical Papers: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mannheim, Karl. 1976. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, trans. Louis Wirth and Edward Shils. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., Inc.; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (First published in German in 1929).Google Scholar
  20. Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 2004. The German Ideology. Part One: With Selections from Part Two and Three and Suplementary Texts, ed. C. J. Arthur. New York: International Publishers (First published in German in 1932).Google Scholar
  21. Metogo, Christel-Donald A. 2014. Enjeux politiques du rationalisme critique chez Karl Popper. HAL archives-ouvertes.fr. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01019885. Accessed 27 April 2017.
  22. More, Thomas. 2003. Utopia, trans. P. Turner (First published in Latin in 1516).Google Scholar
  23. Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Newyork: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Patterson, Dennis. 1996. Law and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Popper, Karl. 1992. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge (First published in German in 1935).Google Scholar
  27. Quine, Willard van O. 1953. From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logical-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Quine, Willard van O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Quine, Willard van O. 1995. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ribeiro, Henrique J. 1987. Karl Popper: A epistemologia como ‘terra-de-ninguém’, ou da tarefa de reconstrução da ciência. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 3–4: 71–108.Google Scholar
  31. Ribeiro, Henrique J. 1998. O fim da filosofia da ciência na história da filosofia analítica. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 3–4: 395–428.Google Scholar
  32. Ribeiro, Henrique J. 2012. Towards a general theory on the existence of typically national philosohies—The Portuguese, the Austrian, the Italian, and other cases reviewed. Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 41: 199–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ribeiro. Henrique J. 2014. The Role of Analogy in Philosophical Discourse. In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy, ed. Henrique J. Ribeiro, 275–290. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Ricoeur, Paul. 1986. Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, Bertrand. 2007. The Analysis of Matter. Nottingham (England): Spokesman (First published in 1927).Google Scholar
  37. Schaffner, Karl. 1972. Nineteenth-Century Aether Theories. Oxford: Oxford Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stillman, Peter G. 2001. Nothing Is. But What Is Not: Utopia as Practical Philosophy. In The Philosophy of Utopia, ed. Barbara Goodwin, 9–23. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  39. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1933. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul (First published in 1921).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Communication and InformationUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations