Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 31))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the various activity trackers available in the market, customers often find themselves confused between choosing one amongst them all. Due to the advancements in technology there are several specifications and features to choose from but the main challenge is that there is not one activity tracker that has it all, hence the need of comparison between the several activity trackers and their specifications. Existing research focuses mostly on giving the specifications of all the activity trackers out there, and not comparing different activity trackers to help the customer make the correct choice. This research paper has outlined the need, challenges and comparison of the specification between the different activity trackers available in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smart watches vs. Fitness Bands. https://smartwatches.org/learn/smartwatches-vs-fitness-bands-difference/

  2. Shih, P.C., Han, K., Poole, E.S., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Use and Adoption Challenges of Wearable Activity Trackers. Pennsylvania State University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fitbit Charge 2. https://www.fitbit.com/in/charge2/charge2-101#fitbit-mobile-device-101-4

  4. de Zambotti, M., Goldstone, A., Claudatos, S., Colrain, I.M., Baker, F.C.: Centre for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA, A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2â„¢ compared with polysomnography in adults. Chronobiol. Int. 34, 465 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitbit Help Article. https://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/Help_article/1874

  6. How water resistant is Charge 2 and Alta HR. https://www.reddit.com/r/fitbit/comments/694dhk/how_water_resistant_is_charge_2_and_alta_hr/

  7. Garmin Vivoactive 3 in depth review. https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2017/10/garmin-vivoactive-3-in-depth-review.html

  8. Fitbit Versa Review. https://www.androidauthority.com/fitbit-versa-review-845214/

  9. Fitbit Versa vs Samsung Gear Sport. https://www.gadgetsnow.com/compare-smartwatch/Fitbit-Versa-vs-Samsung-Gear-Sport

  10. GPS and heart rate accuracy of the Fitbit Versa vs. Samsung Sports Gear. https://thejournier.com/2018/05/28/gps-and-heart-rate-accuracy-of-the-fitbit-versa-vs-samsung-gear-sport/

  11. Fitbit new smart watch. https://www.wareable.com/fitbit/fitbit-new-smartwatch-2018

  12. Gear Sport specifications. https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/gear-sport/specs/

  13. Gear Sport review-The only Fitness Watch for Samsung die hards. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/03/gear-sport-review-the-only-fitness-watch-for-samsung-die-hards/

  14. Samsung Gear Sport Review. https://www.techradar.com/reviews/samsung-gear-sport-review

  15. Samsung Gear Sport Review. https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/gear-sport/

  16. Garmin Forerunner 35 review. https://www.wareable.com/garmin/garmin-forerunner-35-review

  17. AMOLED vs LCD displays- which one is better? https://www.themobileindian.com/news/amoled-vs-lcd-displays-which-one-is-better-18933

  18. Fitbit Heart rate Monitor guide. https://www.wareable.com/fitbit/fitbit-heart-rate-monitor-guide-330

  19. What is GLONASS-how is different from GPS? https://beebom.com/what-is-glonass-and-how-it-is-different-from-gps/

  20. Benedetto, S., Caldato, C., Bazzan, E., Greenwood, D.C., Pensabene, V., Actis, P.: Assessment of the Fitbit Charge 2 for monitoring heart rate. PloS ONE 13, e0192691 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanvi Nikam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nikam, T., Mathew, R. (2020). Comparison of Various Wearable Activity Trackers. In: Pandian, A.P., Senjyu, T., Islam, S.M.S., Wang, H. (eds) Proceeding of the International Conference on Computer Networks, Big Data and IoT (ICCBI - 2018). ICCBI 2018. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24643-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24643-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24642-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24643-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics