Surgical Maxillary Expansion for OSA Adults with Nasal Obstruction



Maxillary skeletal expansion has been developed to correct the transverse skeletal discrepancy from orthodontic point of view. Moreover, maxillary skeletal expansion has another great value of expanding nasal cavity to increase nasal airflow in OSA patients with nasal obstruction or serious nasal resistance. In particular, adult OSA patients who have fully matured midpalatal and circum-maxillary sutures require adjunctive surgical procedures for the successful basal bone expansion. Currently, distraction osteogenesis maxillary expansion (DOME), which has been updated from surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) with the development of orthodontic microimplants, is widely applied up to the elderly OSA patients suffering from severe nasal obstruction. In addition, multipiece segmental osteotomy (SO) can be applied to some cases who are scheduled for orthognathic surgery.

In this chapter, DOME procedure will be introduced in comparison with the traditional SARPE and SO procedures based on the differential clinical values in treating the OSA adults belong to the craniofacial phenotype with nasomaxillary constriction.


Nasomaxillary transverse constriction Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion Distraction osteogenesis maxillary expansion Segmental osteotomy 


  1. 1.
    Deeb W, Hansen L, Hotan T, et al. Changes in nasal volume after surgically assisted bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):782–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zambon C, Ceccheti M, Utumi E, et al. Orthodontic measurements and nasal respiratory function after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: an acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(9):1120–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdullatif J, Certal V, Zaghi S, et al. Maxillary expansion and maxillomandibular expansion for adult OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(5):574–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buck LM, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA, Papadopoulou AK. Effect of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on upper airway volume: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(5):1025–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guilleminault C, Partinen M, Hollman K, et al. Familial aggregates in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest. 1995;107(6):1545–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gautam P, Valiathan A, Adhikari R. Stress and displacement patterns in the craniofacial skeleton with rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element method study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(1):5. e1–5. e11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Medeiros JR, Bezerra MF, Costa FG, et al. Does pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion influence upper airway volume? A prospective study using Dolphin Imaging 3D. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(9):1094–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sygouros A, Motro M, Ugurlu F, Acar A. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146(6):748–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu SY-C, Guilleminault C, Huon L-K, Yoon A. Distraction osteogenesis maxillary expansion (DOME) for adult obstructive sleep apnea patients with high arched palate. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(2):345–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Northway WM, Meade JB Jr. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a comparison of technique, response, and stability. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(4):309–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seeberger R, Kater W, Davids R, Thiele OC. Long term effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion without performing osteotomy of the pterygoid plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38(3):175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nada RM, van Loon B, Schols JG, et al. Volumetric changes of the nose and nasal airway 2 years after tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121(5):450–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamedi-Sangsari A, Chinipardaz Z, Carrasco L. Following surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion, do tooth-borne or bone-borne appliances provide more skeletal expansion and dental expansion? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(10):2211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yao W, Bekmezian S, Hardy D, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion and multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(3):499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marchetti C, Pironi M, Bianchi A, Musci A. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion vs. segmental Le Fort I osteotomy: transverse stability over a 2-year period. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37(2):74–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Junior OH, Guijarro-Martínez R, de Sousa Gil A, et al. Stability and surgical complications in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(9):1071–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seeberger R, Gander E, Hoffmann J, Engel M. Surgical management of cross-bites in orthognathic surgery: surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) versus two-piece maxilla. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(7):1109–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kretschmer WB, Baciut G, Baciut M, et al. Transverse stability of 3-piece Le Fort I osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(3):861–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthodonticsKyung Hee University School of DentistrySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations