Customer Feedback Prioritization Technique: A Case Study on Lean Startup

  • Syeda Sumbul HossainEmail author
  • S. A. M. Jubayer
  • Shadikur Rahman
  • Touhid Bhuiyan
  • Lamisha Rawshan
  • Saiful Islam
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11623)


Nowadays, a startup is being very popular and entrepreneurs are increasing day by day. Though we are watching many successful startups e.g. Dropbox, Amazon, Viber and so on, the list of unsuccessful startups is very long. Who is being successful they must have their own strategy, which they apply in their startup and get success. In lean startup strategy, the customers give feedbacks about the startup and the owner understands the demand of customers by collecting feedback from customers and provides service according to the feedback. On the other hand, all the feedbacks from the customers are not important for a startup project. So it is needed to separate or prioritize feedbacks which are needed to execute the startup project. But there are not sufficient techniques for prioritizing the feedbacks collected from customers. By conducting a systematic mapping study and a case study (interview and observation is used), we propose a technique which will be used to prioritize customer feedback in lean startup. This technique will be helpful for the startup projects to become successful.


Lean startup Customer Feedback Prioritization technique 


  1. 1.
    Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blank, S.: Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5), 63–72 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hart, M.A.: The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses Eric Ries, 320 p. Crown Business, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Myyryläinen, M., Hämäläinen, H.: Lean startup approach for innovative corporate culture (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petersen, K., et al.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: EASE, vol. 8 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mujtaba, S., et al.: Software product line variability: a systematic mapping study. School of Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews, vol. 33, no. 2004, pp. 1–26. Keele University, Keele, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Budgen, D., et al.: Using mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of PPIG, vol. 8. Lancaster University (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jan, N., Ibrar, M.: Systematic mapping of value-based software engineering: a systematic review of value-based requirements engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Razzak, M.A., Ahmed, R., Mite, D.: Spatial knowledge creation and sharing activities in a distributed agile project. In: 2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops (ICGSEW). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Musante, K., DeWalt, B.R.: Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira, Lanham (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oakley, A.: Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology 32(4), 707–731 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mason, J.: Linking qualitative and quantitative data analysis. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data, pp. 89–110 (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Basit, T.: Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educ. Res. 45(2), 143–154 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sauvola, T., et al.: Continuous improvement and validation with customer touchpoint model in software development. In: ICSEA 2018, p. 62 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elberzhager, F., Holl, K., Karn, B., Immich, T.: Rapid lean UX development through user feedback revelation. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds.) PROFES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10611, pp. 535–542. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salas Martinez, M.: Good Practices of the Lean Startup Methodology: Benefits, Challenges and Recommendations (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Girgenti, A., et al.: An axiomatic design approach for customer satisfaction through a lean start-up framework. Procedia CIRP 53, 151–157 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syeda Sumbul Hossain
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. A. M. Jubayer
    • 2
  • Shadikur Rahman
    • 1
  • Touhid Bhuiyan
    • 1
  • Lamisha Rawshan
    • 1
  • Saiful Islam
    • 1
  1. 1.Daffodil International UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Wardan Tech Ltd.DhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations