Skip to main content

Effective Transform Domain Denoising of Oceanographic SAR Images for Improved Target Characterization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1391 Accesses

Part of the book series: Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing ((RDIP,volume 24))

Abstract

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images are widely used for a variety of applications such as surveillance, agricultural assessment and classification, planetary and celestial investigations, geology and mining, etc., due to its remarkable characteristic of capturing it under all weather conditions. SAR images are highly prone to speckle noise due to the ingrained nature of radar backscatter. Speckle removal is highly essential to limit the difficulty encountered while processing the SAR images. An exhaustive work has been done by researchers to despeckle SAR images using spatial filters, wavelet transform, and hybrid approaches. This work aims at exploring the different despeckling techniques to identify the best and suitable methodology. On measuring the despeckling performance using Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Edge Preservation Ratio, Speckle Suppression Index, Speckle Suppression and Mean Preservation Index, and Structural Similarity Index simultaneously for the various techniques experimented, ridgelet transform-based thresholding works well. It gives better results by applying ridgelet transform and processing the subbands with minimax thresholding. The type and characteristics of the scene imaged also influence the result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hu C, Ferro Famil L, Kuang G (2013) Ship discrimination using polarimetric SAR data and coherent time-frequency analysis. Remote Sens 5:6899–6920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Margarit G, Barba Milanés JA, Tabasco A (2009) Operational ship monitoring system based on synthetic aperture radar processing. Remote Sens 1:375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaybhay J, Shastri R (2015) A study of speckle noise reduction filters. Signal Image Process Int J 6(3):71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee J-S (1981) Speckle analysis and smoothing of synthetic aperture radar images. Comput Graph Image Process 17(1):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee J-S (1980) Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2(2):165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee J-S (1983) A simple speckle smoothing algorithm for synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 13(1):85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1985) Adaptive noise smoothing filter for image with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 7(2):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1987) Adaptive restoration of images with speckle. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 35(3):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC, Smith SA (1981) An adaptive filter for smoothing noisy radar images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, pp 133–155

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC (1982) A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 4(2):157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7):629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuda S, Hirosawa H (1998) Suppression of speckle in synthetic aperture radar images using wavelets. Int J Remote Sens 19(3):507–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen GY, Kègl B (2007) Image denoising with complex ridgelets. Pattern Recogn 40:578–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Starck J-L, Candès EJ, Donoho DL (2002) The curvelet transform for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 11(6):670–684

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gir R, Jain L, Rai R (2015) Despeckling of SAR images using wavelet based iterative brute force thresholding with median filter and Savitzky-Golay filter. Int J Comput Appl 120(20):0975–8887

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rafael C, Gonzalez RE (2008) Woods: digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao F, Zhang Y (2011) A comparative study on thresholding methods in wavelet based image denoising. Procedia Eng 15:3998–4003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukuda S, Hirosawa H (1999) Smoothing effect of wavelet-based speckle filtering: the Haar basis case. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37:1168–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Donoho DL (1995) Denoising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41:613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soman KP, Ramachandhran KI, Resmi NG (2004) Insight into wavelets: from theory to practice, 3rd edn. PHI Learning, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goljan M, Fridrich J, Holotyak T (2006) New blind steganalysis and its implications. In: Proceedings SPIE, Electronics imaging, security, steganography and watermarking of multimedia contents VIII, vol 6072, San Jose, CA, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rajamani A, Krishnaveni V (2014) Performance analysis survey of various SAR image despeckling techniques. Int J Comput Appl 90(7):0975–8887

    Google Scholar 

  23. Biradar N, Dewal ML, Rohit M, Gowre S, Gundge Y (2016) Blind source parameters for performance evaluation of despeckling filters. Int J Biomed Imaging 2016:3636017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. https://crisp.nus.edu.sg/ers/ers.html

  25. Gao G, Liu L, Zhao L, Shi G, Kuang G (2009) An adaptive and fast CFAR algorithm based on automatic sensoring for target detection in high–resolution SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(6):1685–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is fully supported by NPOL, Cochin, and the authors would like to acknowledge their support. They would also like to express their gratitude to the anonymous editors and reviewers for their helpful suggestions and constructive comments. Also, the authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the management and principal of MSEC for providing the necessary facilities and support to carry out this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Newlin Shebiah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arivazhagan, S., Sylvia Lilly Jebarani, W., Newlin Shebiah, R., Vineth Ligi, S., Hareesh Kumar, P.V., Anilkumar, K. (2020). Effective Transform Domain Denoising of Oceanographic SAR Images for Improved Target Characterization. In: Hemanth, D. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Satellite Image Analysis. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24178-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics