Skip to main content

Slavery

Forgetting Cairnes: The Slave Power (1862) and the Political Economy of Racism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover From Political Economy to Economics through Nineteenth-Century Literature

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Culture and Economics ((PSLCE))

Abstract

This chapter considers J. E. Cairnes’s The Slave Power in relation to emerging research in economics and history. Published during the American Civil War, it delivered significant insights on the dispossessive logics of slavery and anti-black racism. These insights were inconsistent with dominant framings of capitalism in the twentieth century and were typically marginalized. Historians and economists have recently returned to consider the relationship of slavery to capitalism. Many of these arguments were there long before in the work of black scholars and activists, but their emergence in predominantly white academic circles is significant, calling for a reevaluation not just of received ideas about the economic impact of racism, but of the knowledge enterprises that produced and reproduced them, and, in turn, of Cairnes’s book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This convergence is the subject of Baucom (2005).

  2. 2.

    As Regenia Gagnier writes, “The object of neoclassical economics under the Marginal Revolution after 1870, was to maximize individual choice and preference without comparing or ranking needs intersubjectively” (Gagnier 2010). See also Fullbrook (2004).

  3. 3.

    On response to Beckert and Baptist’s books, see Parry (2016) and Hilt (2017).

  4. 4.

    Parry (2016) is a good introduction. See also Hilt (2017).

  5. 5.

    It is this premise that economist Duncan Foley (2008) calls “Adam’s Fallacy,” a category error that elevates markets onto a plane distinct from social and political institutions.

  6. 6.

    A good exemplar is Charles Trevelyan’s lengthy Edinburgh Review essay of 1848, “The Irish Crisis.” This line of thinking also runs ambivalently through Anthony Trollope’s letters about government Famine relief efforts in the Sunday Examiner (Trollope 1965).

  7. 7.

    Qtd. in Gray (1999, 157). Mill is writing here in the Morning Chronicle, part of a series of articles on the Famine that appeared that year and the next.

  8. 8.

    South Carolina essayist Louisa McCord contended in 1856 that “It must be more profitable to [a master] to have healthy and happy slaves than sick and wretched ones” (qtd. in Carlander and Brownlee 2006, 399).

  9. 9.

    Smallwood’s essay appears in a special edition of the Boston Review dedicated to the memory of Cedric Robinson, who died in 2016.

  10. 10.

    Neither Beckert (2015) nor Baptist (2014) reviews this literature in any detail in their studies, signaling their departure from this earlier conversation rather than an incremental advance upon it. Beckert and Rockman’s introduction to the volume Slavery’s Capitalism (2016) outlines Fogel and Engerman’s argument, as well as Fogel’s subsequent corrective, Without Consent or Contact (1989).

  11. 11.

    “As Gary Becker first explained systematically, the free market contains automatic penalties for the odious practices that most people have in mind when they deplore ‘discrimination’” (Murphy 2010). Empirical studies aiming to test Becker’s thesis include Charles and Guryan (2008).

  12. 12.

    For example, Carlyle (1849) and Ruskin (1893). The latter is a pamphlet published by a Liverpool tabacconist, with extracts from Ruskin’s work and a racist cover illustration.

References

  • Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. Rev. ed. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, Stephen V. 2013. A Massacre in Memphis: The Race Riot That Shook the Nation One Year after the Civil War. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptist, Edward. 2014. The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baradaran, Mehrsa. 2017. The Color of Money: Black Banks and the Racial Wealth Gap. Cambridge: Belknap.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, Ian. 2005. Specters of the Atlantic: Finance Capital, Slavery, and the Philosophy of History. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Sven. 2015. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Sven, and Seth Rockman. 2016. Introduction. In Slavery’s Capitalism: A New History of American Economic Development, 1–28. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, Gordon. 2003. Fiction, Famine, and the Rise of Economics in Victorian Britain and Ireland. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackett, Richard J.M. 2000. Divided Hearts: Britain and the American Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, T.A., and T.P. Foley. 1983. John Eliot Cairnes, John Stuart Mill and Ireland: Some Problems for Political Economy. Hermathena 135 (Winter): 96–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairnes, John Elliott. 1873. Essays in Political Economy, Theoretical and Applied. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Slave Power: Its Character, Career, and Probable Designs (1862). Reprint ed. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlander, Jay R., and W. Elliot Brownlee. 2006. Antebellum Southern Political Economists and the Problem of Slavery. American Nineteenth Century History 7 (3, Sep.): 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, Thomas. 1849. Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question. Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 40: 670–679. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=inu.30000080778727;view=1up;seq=690

  • Charles, Kerwin Kofi, and Jonathan Guryan. 2008. Prejudice and Wages: An Empirical Assessment of Becker’s The Economics of Discrimination. Journal of Political Economy 116 (5): 773–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darity, William Jr., Darrick Hamilton, and James B. Stewart. 2015. A Tour de Force in Understanding Intergroup Inequality: An Introduction to Stratification Economics. Review of Black Political Economy 42: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, David Brion. 1975. The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. 1998. Black Reconstruction in America (1935). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. “Of the Sons of Master and Man.” In The Souls of Black Folk (1903), ed. Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and Terri Hume Oliver. Norton Critical ed., 105–119. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eric Hilt, (2017) Economic History, Historical Analysis, and the “New History of Capitalism”. The Journal of Economic History 77 (2):511–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, Robert William. 1989. Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, Robert William, and Stanley L. Engerman. 1989. Time on the Cross: The Economics of Negro Slavery, with New Afterward. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, Duncan. 2008. Adam’s Fallacy: A Guide to Economic Theology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 2002. Capitalism and Freedom. 40th Anniversary ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullbrook, Edward. 2004. Descartes’ Legacy: Intersubjective Reality, Intrasubjective Theory. In The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, ed. John Bryan Davis, Alain Marciano, and John Runde, 403–422. London: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnier, Regenia. 2010. Individualism, Decadence, and Globalization: On the Relationship between Part and Whole. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Peter. 1999. Famine, Land and Politics: British Government and Irish Society, 1843–50. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Darrick, and William Darity Jr. 2015. The Political Economy of Education, Literacy, and the Racial Wealth Gap. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 99 (1): 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, James S. 2002. Riot and Remembrance: The Tulsa Race War. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, William Stanley. 1957. The Theory of Political Economy (1870). Reprint ed. Edited by H. Stanley Jevons. New York: Kelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaver, Claudia. 2003. Rewriting Ricardo/Renewing Smith. In A/Moral Economics: Classical Political Economy and Cultural Authority in Nineteenth-Century England, 134–160. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David M. 2002. How the Dismal Science Got its Name: Classical Economics and the Ur-Text of Racial Politics. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David M., and Sandra J. Peart. 2001–2002. The Secret History of the Dismal Science. 6 Parts. The Library of Economics and Liberty, January 22, 2001–May 13, 2002. https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/LevyPeartdismal.html?highlight=%5B%22peart%22,%22levy%22%5D.

  • Maas, Harro. 2015. Olmsted, De Bow, and the Weight of Evidence on the American Slave South. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37 (2): 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Harriet. 1832. Demerara. In Illustrations of Political Economy, No. IV. London: Fox. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1690.

  • Marx, Karl. 1977. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Edited by Ernest Mandel and translated by Ben Fowkes. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1965. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. II and III. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Robert P. 2010. The Economics of Discrimination. The Library of Economics and Liberty, August 2. https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2010/Murphydiscrimination.html.

  • Parry, Marc. 2016. Shackles and Dollars. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 8. https://www.chronicle.com/article/ShacklesDollars.

  • Robinson, Cedric. 1983. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockman, Seth. 2014. What Makes the History of Capitalism Newsworthy? Journal of the Early Republic 34 (3, Fall): 439–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodney, Walter. 2018. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani, Suresh Naidu, and Gabriel Zucman. 2019. Economics after Neoliberalism. Boston Review, February 15. http://bostonreview.net/forum/suresh-naidu-dani-rodrik-gabriel-zucman-economics-after-neoliberalism.

  • Ross, Ian Simpson. 1995. The Life of Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, John. 1893. Ruskin on Himself and Things in General. Edited by William Lewin. Cope’s Smoke-Room Booklets 13. Liverpool: Cope’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satter, Beryl. 2009. Family Properties: Race, Real Estate, and the Exploitation of Black Urban America. New York: Metropolitain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, Stephanie. 2017. What Slavery Tells us about Marx. In Race, Capitalism, Justice, ed. Walter Johnson and Robin D. G. Kelley. Boston Review: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976a. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Edited by R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, and P.G. Stein. Glasgow Ed. of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976b. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by D. D. Raphael and A. L. MacFie. Glasgow Ed. of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The Wealth of Nations. Edited by Edwin Cannan. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Mark M. 2003. Introduction. In The Slave Power: Its Character, Career, and Probable Designs (1862), ed. John Elliott Cairnes. Reprint ed., xvii–lvi. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Laura. 2006. Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226767352.001.0001

  • Steinbaum, Marshall. 2019. Response to Rodrik et al. Boston Review, February 28. http://bostonreview.net/forum/economics-after-neoliberalism/marshall-steinbaum-empiricism-alone-wont-save-us

  • Swaminathan, Srividhya. 2007. Adam Smith’s Moral Economy and the Debate to Abolish the Slave Trade. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37: 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Christopher. 2018. Empire of Neglect: The West Indies in the Wake of British Liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, Charles. 1848. The Irish Crisis. Edinburgh Review 87 (176, Jan.): 229–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trollope, Anthony. 1965. Trollope’s Letters to the Examiner. Edited by Helen Garlinghouse King. The Princeton University Library Chronicle 26: 71–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein. 1898. Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 12 (4, July): 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Adelaide. 1968. John Eliot Cairnes and the American Civil War. London: Kingswood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Eric. 1944. Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zastoupil, Lynn. 1983. Moral Government: J.S. Mill on Ireland. Historical Journal XXVI: 707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bigelow, G. (2019). Slavery. In: Hadley, E., Jaffe, A., Winter, S. (eds) From Political Economy to Economics through Nineteenth-Century Literature. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Culture and Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24158-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics