After the Tango in the Doorway: An Autoethnography of Living with Persistent Pain

  • Bronwyn Lennox ThompsonEmail author


Persistent pain is a common health problem and increasingly, qualitative research is being used to explore the impact on daily lived experience. Stigmatisation and “othering” is reported in these studies, and health professionals indicate they struggle to know how best to help this group of people. In this autoethnography, I provide an account of my life as a clinician, educator, researcher and social media commentator who lives with fibromyalgia. Through this narrative I consider the social factors influencing my attitudes towards my own pain over time, and the position I hold as a member of many different social groups discussing persistent pain management.

Clinical Implications

  • People seeking help for their pain are influenced by family habits and attitudes towards healthcare and accepting clinical opinion.

  • Although persistent pain is common, “othering” or the tendency to see those with persistent pain as different from clinicians (in a negative way) is frequently encountered. This may be inadvertent but results in stigma.

  • Information about pain mechanisms is insufficient for supporting a new way of living life for people with persistent pain.

  • People with persistent pain may reject the narratives of people who have learned to live well with their pain, and this can be isolating and difficult to deal with.

  • There is little research investigating how clinicians advise people of their persistent pain diagnosis, leaving a gap in our understanding of the best way to convey this information.

  • Researchers who themselves live with persistent pain provide a unique insight into what it is like and may offer new ways for clinicians to carry out their work.


Othering Health professional attitudes Persistent pain Autoethnography 


  1. 1.
    Chang H. Autoethnography: raising cultural consciousness of self and others. In: Methodological developments in ethnography. Bingley: Emerald Group; 2007. p. 207–21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellis C, Adams TE, Bochner AP. Autoethnography: an overview. Hist Soc Res. 2011:273–90.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wall S. Easier said than done: writing an autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods. 2008;7(1):38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams TE, Ellis C, Jones SH. Autoethnography. In: Matthes J, editor. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schafer G, Prkachin KM, Kaseweter KA, Williams AC. Health care providers’ judgments in chronic pain: the influence of gender and trustworthiness. Pain. 2016;157(8):1618–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ashton-James CE, Nicholas MK. Appearance of trustworthiness: an implicit source of bias in judgments of patients’ pain. Pain. 2016;157(8):1583–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams EN, Morrow SL. Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: a pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychother Res. 2009;19(4–5):576–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strouse SM, Nickerson CJ. Professional culture brokers: nursing faculty perceptions of nursing culture and their role in student formation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;18:10–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spencer-Oatey H. What is culture? A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. Available at GlobalPAD Open House. Retrieved; 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Denshire S. On auto-ethnography. Curr Sociol. 2014;62(6):831–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150(3699):971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fordyce WE, Fowler RS, DeLateur B. An application of behavior modification technique to a problem of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther. 1968;6(1):105–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loeser JD. In Memoriam: John J. Bonica [Internet]. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain; 1994 [cited 2019 1/8/2019]. Available from:
  14. 14.
    McKenzie Institute New Zealand. About Robin McKenzie [Internet]; undated [cited 02/02/2019]. Available from:
  15. 15.
    Melzack R, Wall PD. The challenge of pain. 2nd ed. London: Penguin; 1996. 447 p.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):426–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maughan DL, Economou A. Social networking sites: a clinical dilemma? J Med Ethics. 2015;41(2):203–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan SSL, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2017;19(1):e9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown P, Elston MA, Gabe J. From patient deference towards negotiated and precarious informality: an Eliasian analysis of english general practitioners’ understandings of changing patient relations. Soc Sci Med. 2015;146:164–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dukhu S, Purcell C, Bulley C. Person-centred care in the physiotherapeutic management of long-term conditions: a critical review of components, barriers and facilitators. Int Pract Dev J. 2018;8(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips RL, Short A, Kenning A, Dugdale P, Nugus P, McGowan R, et al. Achieving patient-centred care: the potential and challenge of the patient-as-professional role. Health Expect: Int J Pub Part Health Care Health Policy. 2015;18(6):2616–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poulin P, Shergill Y, Romanow H, Busse JW, Chambers CT, Cooper L, et al. Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: a priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research. Can J Pain. 2018;2(1):191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zwar N, Harris M, Griffiths R, Roland M, Dennis S, Powell Davies G, et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management. New South Wales: Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Medicine SoPHaC; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hibbard JH, Greene J, Sacks RM, Overton V, Parrotta C. Improving population health management strategies: identifying patients who are more likely to be users of avoidable costly care and those more likely to develop a new chronic disease. Health Serv Res. 2017;52(4):1297–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moseley G, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(5):324–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2011;92(12):2041–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. Preoperative education addressing postoperative pain in total joint arthroplasty: review of content and educational delivery methods. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29(3):175–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seedman J. The truth about pain science, exercise, and movement [Internet]. 2019 [cited 15/1/2019]. Available from:
  29. 29.
    Loeser JD. Multidisciplinary pain management. In: Merskey H, Loeser JD, Dubner R, editors. The paths of pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 2005. p. 503–11.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Flor H, Turk DC. Chronic pain: an integrated biobehavioral approach. Seattle: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. 547 p.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Main CJ, Sullivan MJL, Watson PJ. Pain management: practical applications of the biopsychosocial perspective. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. 432 p.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain. 1983;17(1):33–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Butler S. The wit and wisdom of Wilbert (Bill) Fordyce (1923–2009). Scand J Pain. 2017;16(1):160–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lempp HK, Hatch SL, Carville SF, Choy EH. Patients’ experiences of living with and receiving treatment for fibromyalgia syndrome: a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2009;10:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Henwood P, Ellis J, Logan J, Dubouloz C-J, D’Eon J. Acceptance of chronic neuropathic pain in spinal cord injured persons: a qualitative approach. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13(4):215–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arnold LM, Crofford LJ, Mease PJ, Burgess SM, Palmer SC, Abetz L, et al. Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(1):114–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toye F, Seers K, Barker KL. Meta-ethnography to understand healthcare professionals’ experience of treating adults with chronic non-malignant pain. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018411.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lennox Thompson B, Gage J, Kirk R. Living well with chronic pain: a classical grounded theory. Disabil Rehabil. 2019:1–12.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pietilä Holmner E, Stålnacke B-M, Enthoven P, Stenberg G. The acceptance. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(1):73–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilcock AA. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walder K, Molineux M. Occupational adaptation and identity reconstruction: a grounded theory synthesis of qualitative studies exploring adults’ experiences of adjustment to chronic disease, major illness or injury. J Occup Sci. 2017;24(2):225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ballantyne JC, Sullivan MD. Intensity of chronic pain: the wrong metric? New Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2098–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). IASP council adopts task force recommendation for third mechanistic descriptor of pain [Internet]. Washington, DC: International association for the study of pain. 2017 [cited 10/01/2019]. Available from:
  44. 44.
    Jones GT, Atzeni F, Beasley M, Flüß E, Sarzi-Puttini P, Macfarlane GJ. The prevalence of fibromyalgia in the general population: a comparison of the American college of rheumatology 1990, 2010, and Modified 2010 Classification Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67(2):568–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Allegretti A, Borkan J, Reis S, Griffiths F. Paired interviews of shared experiences around chronic low back pain: classic mismatch between patients and their doctors. Fam Pract. 2010;27(6):676–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Henry SG, Bell RA, Fenton JJ, Kravitz RL. Goals of chronic pain management: do patients and primary care physicians agree and does it matter? Clin J Pain. 2017;33(11):955–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hardy JK, Crofford LJ, Segerstrom SC. Goal conflict, distress, and pain in women with fibromyalgia: a daily diary study. J Psychosom Res. 2011;70(6):534–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Johnson JL, Bottorff JL, Browne AJ, Grewal S, Hilton BA, Clarke H. Othering and being othered in the context of health care services. Health Commun. 2004;16(2):255–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lehti A, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Stalnacke BM, Hammarstrom A, Wiklund M. Walking down ‘Via Dolorosa’ from primary health care to the specialty pain clinic-patient and professional perceptions of inequity in rehabilitation of chronic pain. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31(1):45–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Woodward A, Thomas S, Jalloh MB, Rees J, Leather A. Reasons to pursue a career in medicine: a qualitative study in Sierra Leone. Global Health Res Policy. 2017;2:34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wouters A, Croiset G, Isik U, Kusurkar RA. Motivation of Dutch high school students from various backgrounds for applying to study medicine: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e014779.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Decety J, Yang CY, Cheng Y. Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: an event-related brain potential study. Neuroimage. 2010;50(4):1676–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morris DB. Animal pain: the limits of meaning. In: van Rysewyk S, editor. Meanings of pain. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 389–99.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Brons L. Othering: an analysis. Transcience: J Global Stud. 2015;6(1):69–90.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Calvo FC, Karras BT, Phillips RL, Kimball AM, Wolf F, editors. Diagnoses, syndromes, and diseases: a knowledge representation problem. Washington: AMIA; 2003:802.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Leach B, Norris JL. Factors in the Development of Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.). In: Kissin B, Begleiter H, editors. The biology of alcoholism: volume 5: treatment and rehabilitation of the chronic alcoholic. Boston: Springer; 1977. p. 441–543.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    New Zealand Ministry of Health. Annual data explorer 2016/17: New Zealand health survey [Internet]. 2017 [cited 04/02/2019]. Available from:
  58. 58.
    Price DD, Aydede M. The experimental use of introspection in the scientific study of pain and its integration with third-person methodologies: the experiential-phenomenological approach. In: Aydede M, editor. Pain: new essays on its nature and the methodology of its study. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2005. p. 243–74.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Charlton JI. Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000. 220 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal MedicineUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations