Advertisement

A Recurrent Neural Network Approach to Improve the Air Quality Index Prediction

  • Fabio CassanoEmail author
  • Antonio Casale
  • Paola Regina
  • Luana Spadafina
  • Petar Sekulic
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1006)

Abstract

Every year, cities all over the world face the problem of the air pollution. In particular seasons, such as the winter, the levels of bad particles coming from the industrial and domestic heating systems increase the risk of pulmonary diseases. Thus, for both the city majors and citizens, it is important to understand and predict the air pollution levels in advance to safe guard the health. Modern forecasting systems are able to alert the population in advance only about the general weather condition, while the air quality information are almost not considered at all. The reasons are manifold and they mostly depend by the difficult that the modern systems have to generalize the problem and correct elaborate the data coming from the sensors. In this paper we address the problem of forecasting the bands of the different air pollutants according to the Air Quality Index in the Apulia region. Using two different Recurrent Neural Network models, we have performed two tests to prove that it is possible to predict the level of the pollutants in a specific area by using the data coming from the surrounding area. By using this approach on both the weather and air stations on the territory it is possible to have alerts many days ahead on the pollution levels.

Keywords

Air Quality Index Recurrent Neural Network Blind prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The present study was developed and granted in the framework of the project: “SeVaRA” (European Community, Minister of the Economic Development, Apulia Region, BURP n. 1883 of the 24/10/2018, Id:2NQR592).

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.O., Thundiyil, J.G., Stolbach, A.: Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health. J. Med. Toxicol. 8(2), 166–175 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bevilacqua, V., Cassano, F., Mininno, E., Iacca, G.: Optimizing feed-forward neural network topology by multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative study on biomedical datasets. In: Italian Workshop on Artificial Life and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 53–64. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niska, H., Hiltunen, T., Karppinen, A., Ruuskanen, J., Kolehmainen, M.: Evolving the neural network model for forecasting air pollution time series. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17(2), 159–167 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng, X., Li, Q., Zhu, Y., Hou, J., Jin, L., Wang, J.: Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM\(_{2.5}\) pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. Atmos. Environ. 107, 118–128 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Che, Z., Purushotham, S., Cho, K., Sontag, D., Liu, Y.: Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 6085 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, C.-J., Kuo, P.-H.: A deep CNN-LSTM model for particulate matter (PM\(_{2.5}\)) forecasting in smart cities. Sensors 18(7), 2220 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stevens, M., D’Hondt, E.: Crowdsourcing of pollution data using smartphones. In: Workshop on Ubiquitous Crowdsourcing (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adams, M.D., Kanaroglou, P.S.: Mapping real-time air pollution health risk for environmental management: combining mobile and stationary air pollution monitoring with neural network models. J. Environ. Manage. 168, 133–141 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sivacoumar, R., Bhanarkar, A., Goyal, S., Gadkari, S., Aggarwal, A.: Air pollution modeling for an industrial complex and model performance evaluation. Environ. Pollut. 111(3), 471–477 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    To, T., Shen, S., Atenafu, E.G., Guan, J., McLimont, S., Stocks, B., Licskai, C.: The air quality health index and asthma morbidity: a population-based study. Environ. Health Perspect. 121(1), 46–52 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng, W.-L., Chen, Y.-S., Zhang, J., Lyons, T., Pai, J.-L., Chang, S.-H.: Comparison of the revised air quality index with the PSI and AQI indices. Sci. Total Environ. 382(2–3), 191–198 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sowlat, M.H., Gharibi, H., Yunesian, M., Mahmoudi, M.T., Lotfi, S.: A novel, fuzzy-based air quality index (FAQI) for air quality assessment. Atmos. Environ. 45(12), 2050–2059 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caivano, D., Cassano, F., Fogli, D., Lanzilotti, R., Piccinno, A.: We@ home: a gamified application for collaboratively managing a smart home. In: International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence, pp. 79–86, Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555 (2014)
  15. 15.
    World Health Organization: Air quality guidelines for Europe (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Cassano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonio Casale
    • 1
  • Paola Regina
    • 1
  • Luana Spadafina
    • 1
  • Petar Sekulic
    • 1
  1. 1.Omnitech Research GroupBariItaly

Personalised recommendations