Skip to main content

Taxing Robots: Clarifications on Legal and Economic Capacity, Capacity to Act and Representation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Biosystems & Biorobotics ((BIOSYSROB,volume 25))

Abstract

The possible taxation of robots poses multiple problems on how to implement it. The initial difficulty revolves around the special tax capacity of robots, the legal personality as determinant of the position of robots as objects or subjects of taxation, the ability to pay and the capacity of robots to act, as well as the possibility of creating a “capacity of representation” on the part of the robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Delanay, K.J.: The robot that takes your job should pay taxes, says Bill Gates, 17 Feb 2017, Quartz (qz.com) (2017)

  2. Barrios Andrés, M. (Dir.): Some voices claim for a new legal discipline (Robot Law). Derecho de los Robots; La Ley Wolter Kluwers, Madrid (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. For example, in California the Transportation Assistance Funding Act of 2018 makes it possible to create taxes on autonomous vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berliri, L.V.: Note alla Decisione della Commissione centrale per le imposte dirette (22 Nov 1939), No. 19.471, “Giurisprudenza delle Imposte Dirette”, 1940, op. 495 and ff,, Capacità giuridica tributaria o concurso di debitori d’imposta?, Riv. It. Dtto. Fin., 1940, p. 237. Similarly A. Berliri, Principi, vol. I, Giuffrè, Milan, 1952, p. 180, although he subsequently modified his position in Il testo unico delle imposte dirette, Giuffrè, Milan, 1960, in view of art. 8 of this body of law, similar to art. 35.4 of the current Spanish General Tax Act (Ley General Tributaria) (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  5. These entities without personality are usually a case of plurality of people who have common assets, on which the tax obligation must be effective. In other cases, there is a temporarily indeterminate owner of certain assets that make up a separate estate (e.g. the unsettled inheritance, until it is accepted). R. Falcón y Tella, Derecho financiero y tributario (parte general), Servicio de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Derechi, UCM, 7th ed,, Madrid, 2017, pp. 223–224. Los entes de hecho como sujetos pasivos de la obligación tributaria, Civitas. Revista española de derecho financiero, no. 88, pp. 657–670 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Díaz Alabart, S.: Robots y responsabilidad civil, Reus, Madrid (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grau Ruiz, M.A.: La búsqueda de alternativas para la tributación de los robots: la tasa californiana aplicable a los vehículos autónomos. In: García Novoa, C. (Dir.) Cuarta Revolución Industrial. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  8. García Mexía, P.: “entes capaces no personales” (ECNP): “Entes Capaces No Personales. ¿Hacia una personalidad para los robots?” https://www.automatas.tech/pablo-garcia-mexia-colaboracion.html. Accessed March 2018. quoted by M. A. Grau Ruíz; M. Y. Sánchez-Urán Azaña: “El impacto de la robótica, en especial la robótica inclusiva, en el trabajo: aspectos jurídicos-laborales y fiscales”, Eprint UCM, 2018. [https://eprints.ucm.es/47523/] “Robotics and Work: Labor and Tax regulatory Framework”, International Congress Technological Innovation and Future of Work, 5 - 6 April 2018, Santiago de Compostela. Eprint UCM, 2018. https://eprints.ucm.es/47718/

  9. Gigglberger, J.: Breves apuntes sobre la evolución de la sociedad comercial. Revista Jurídica Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales (UCES) 14, 43–58 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. This creative impulse gave rise to new forms of enterprise, constituted exclusively by contributions of money. In this way, the personal base of the individual company and the collective company is replaced by the strictly capitalist base of the public limited company. J. Garrigues, Hacia un nuevo Derecho Mercantil, Madrid, Tecnos, p. 24 and ff (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. García Novoa, C.: La tributación de los robots y el futurismo fiscal, Taxlandia, 17 April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oberson, X.: Taxing robots? From the emergence of an electronic ability to pay to a tax on robots or the use of robots. World Tax J. 9, 247–261 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. García Novoa, C.: Impuestos atípicos en la era post BEPS. In: Cubero Truyo, A. (Dir.) Tributos asistemáticos del ordenamiento vigente, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, pp. 223–224 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Álvaro Falcón Pulido .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Falcón Pulido, Á. (2020). Taxing Robots: Clarifications on Legal and Economic Capacity, Capacity to Act and Representation. In: Pons, J. (eds) Inclusive Robotics for a Better Society. INBOTS 2018. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24074-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics