Human Perception

  • Zbigniew LesEmail author
  • Magdalena Les
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 842)


In this book, the new field of research, namely, machine perception MU that is placed in the broader context of research in machine understanding, is presented.


  1. 1.
    Kirk GS, Raven JE (1957) The pre-socratic philosophers. A critical history with a selection of texts. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plato (1993) Republic (trans: Waterfield R). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aristotle (1989) Metaphysics (trans: Tredennick H), vol 17, 18. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aristotle (2014) Categories (trans: Edghill E). The University of Adelaide, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilson E (1991) The spirit of mediaeval philosophy. University of Notre Dame Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumgarten A (1750) AestheticaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Locke J (1961) An essay concerning human understanding. Dent, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berkeley G (1996) Principles of human knowledge and three dialogues. The world’s classics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    von Helmholtz H (1878) The facts of perception. In: Kahl R (ed) Selected writings of Hermann von Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press, 1971, Middletown, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gregory R (1974) Concepts and mechanisms of perception. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gregory RL (1970) The intelligent eye. McGraw-Hill Paperbacks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koehler W (1929) Gestalt psychology. LiverlightGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koffka K (1935) Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt Brace, JovanovicGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kant I (1998) Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hebb D (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Minsky M, Papert S (1969) Perceptrons. M.I.T Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kilpatrick WH (1952) The supposed conflict between moral freedom and scientific determinism. Educ Theory 2(1):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ittelson WH (1952) The Ames demonstrations in perception. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruner JS, Goodman CC (1947) Value and need as organizing factors in perception. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 42:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gibson J (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watson JB (1913) Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychol Rev 20:158–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Watson JB (1924) Behaviorism. People’s Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marr D (1976) Early processing of visual information. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 275:483–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marr D (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pentland AP (1986) Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artif Intell 28(3):293–331MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koenderink J, van Doorn A (1986) Dynamic shape. Biol Cybernet 53:383–396MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Warrington EK, Taylor AM (1978) Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception 7(6):695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Attneave F, Arnoult MD (1956) The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol Bull 53:452–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Attneave F (1954) Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev 61(3):183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Richards W, Hoffman D (1985) Codon constraints on closed 2-D shapes. Graph Image Process 31:265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoffman D, Richards W (1984) Parts of recognition. Cognition 18:65–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lowe EJ (1993) Perception: a causal representative theory. In: Wright E (ed) New representationalism: essays in the philosophy of perception. Avebury, AldershotGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The St. Queen Jadwiga Research Institute of UnderstandingToorak, MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations