Abstract
This chapter has three key aims. First, to describe research into likely public behaviour during mass emergencies, and to demonstrate how the way in which an incident is managed will affect the way in which members of the public respond. Second, to highlight how an effective responder management strategy can promote positive public behaviours during mass decontamination. Third, to outline some specific recommendations for optimising the way in which incidents involving mass decontamination are managed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguirre BE. Commentary on “Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster”. Emergency evacuations, panic, and social psychology. Psychiatry. 2005;68(2):121–9.
Aguirre BE, Torres MR, Gill KB, Hotchkiss HL. Normative collective behaviour in the station building fire. Soc Sci Q. 2011;92(1):100–18.
Auf der Heide E. Common misconceptions about disasters: panic, the ‘disaster syndrome’, and looting. In: O’Leary M, editor. The first 72 hours: a community approach to disaster preparedness. Lincoln, Nebraska: iUniverse Publishing; 2004. p. 340–80.
Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Public experiences of mass casualty decontamination. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012;10(3):280–9.
Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Communication during mass casualty decontamination: highlighting the gaps. Int J Emerg Serv. 2013a;2(1):29–48.
Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. The effect of communication on anxiety and compliance during mass decontamination. Disaster Prev Manag. 2013b;22(2):132–47.
Carter H, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Perceived responder legitimacy and group identification predict cooperation and compliance in a mass decontamination field exercise. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2013c;35(6):575–85.
Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Emergency responders’ experiences of and expectations regarding decontamination. Int J Emerg Serv. 2014a;3(2):179–92.
Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Effective responder communication improves efficiency and psychological outcomes in a mass decontamination field experiment: implications for public behaviour in the event of a chemical incident. PLoS One. 2014b;9(3):e89846.
Carter H, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Effective responder communication, perceived responder legitimacy and group identification predict public cooperation and compliance in a mass decontamination visualisation experiment. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2015a;45(3):173–89.
Carter H, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Applying crowd psychology to develop recommendations for the management of mass decontamination. Health Secur. 2015b;13(1):45–53.
Carter H, Amlôt R. Mass casualty decontamination guidance and psychosocial aspects of CBRN incident management: a review and synthesis. PLoS Curr. 2016;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.c2d3d652d9d07a2a620ed5429e017ef5.
Carter H, Weston D, Betts N, Wilkinson S, Amlôt R. Public perceptions of emergency decontamination: effects of intervention type and responder management strategy during a focus group study. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195922.
Carter H, Weston D, Symons C, Amlôt R. Public perceptions of pre-incident information campaign materials for the initial response to a chemical incident: the ‘Remove, Remove, Remove’ campaign. Disaster Prev Manag. (In press).
Cornish P. The CBRN system: assessing the threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons in the United Kingdom. London: Chatham House; 2007.
Cornwell B. Panic or situational constraints? The case of the M/V Estonia. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2001;19(1):5–25.
Cornwell B. Bonded fatalities: relational and ecological dimensions of a fire evacuation. Sociol Q. 2003;44(4):617–38.
DiGiovanni C. Domestic terrorism with chemical or biological agents: psychiatric aspects. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;156(10):1500–5.
Donald I, Canter D. Behavioural aspects of the King’s cross disaster. In: Canter D, editor. Fires and human behaviour. 2nd ed. David Fulton Publishers: London; 1990. p. 15–30.
Drury J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2018;29(1):38–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948.
Drury J, Carter H, Cocking C, Ntontis E, Tekin Guven S, Amlôt R. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Front Public Health. (submitted).
Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S. Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009b;48:487–506.
Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S. The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2009a;27(1):66–95.
Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S, Burton A, Schofield D, Hardwick A, Graham D, Langston P. Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: a new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model. Behav Res Methods. 2009c;41(3):957–70.
Drury J, Novelli D, Stott C. Psychological disaster myths in the perception and management of mass emergencies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013;43(11):2259–70.
Drury J, Reicher S. Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. Br J Soc Psychol. 2000;39:579–604.
Dynes RR. Community emergency planning: false assumptions and inappropriate analogies. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1994;12(2):141–58.
Edwards NA, Caldicott DGE, Eliseo T, Pearce A. Truth hurts – hard lessons from Australia’s largest mass casualty exercise with contaminated patients. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(2):185–95.
Feinberg WE, Johnson NR. The ties that bind: a macro-level approach to panic. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters, 2001;19(3).
Furedi F. Fear and security: a vulnerability-led policy response. Soc Policy Adm. 2008;42(6):645–61.
Gannt P, Gannt R. Disaster psychology: dispelling the myths of panic. Prof Saf. 2012;2012:42–9.
Hanley C. Residents sickened by pesticide cloud; ag officials insider changing rules. Latino News; 1999. Retrieved 7 October, 2010, from http://wearcam.org/decon/decon_like_rape_dec99.html
Haslam SA, Jetten J, Waghorn C. Social identification, stress and citizenship in teams: a five-phase longitudinal study. Stress Health. 2009;25:21–30.
Holloway HC, Norwood AE, Fullerton CS, Engel CC, Ursano RJ. The threat of biological weapons: prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278(5):425–7.
Johnson NR. Panic at “the who concert stampede”: an empirical assessment. Soc Probl. 1987;34(4):362–73.
Johnson NR. Fire in a crowded theatre: a descriptive investigation of the emergence of panic. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1988;6(1):7–26.
Levine M, Cassidy C, Brazier G, Reicher S. Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: two experimental studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(7):1452–63.
Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher S. Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behaviour. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2005;31:443.
Levine M, Thompson K. Identity, place, and bystander intervention: social categories and helping after natural disasters. J Soc Psychol. 2004;144(3):229–45.
Quarantelli EL. The nature and conditions of panic. Am J Sociol. 1954;60(3):267–75.
Regis E. Evaluating the threat: does mass biopanic portend mass destruction? Sci Am. 2001;285(6):21–3.
Reicher S. ‘The Battle of Westminster’: developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1996;26:115–34.
Reicher S. The psychology of crowd dynamics. In: Hogg MA, Tindale RS, editors. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001.
Stott C, Drury J. Crowds, context and identity: dynamic categorisation processes in the ‘poll tax riot’. Hum Relat. 2000;53:247–73.
Stott C, Hoggett J, Pearson G. ‘Keeping the peace’: social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. Br J Criminol. 2012;52:381–99.
Stott C, Hutchison P, Drury J. ‘Hooligans’ abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective ‘disorder’ at the 1998 World Cup Finals. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:359–84.
Stott C, Reicher S. How conflict escalates: the inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd ‘violence’. Sociology. 1998;32:353–77.
Tajfel H, Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth; 1979.
Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1987.
United States Fire Administration. Fire Department response to biological threat at B’nai B’rith headquarters. Washington, DC: United States Fire Administration; 1997.
Vogt BM, Sorensen JH. How clean is safe? Improving the effectiveness of decontamination of structures and people following chemical and biological incidents. Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2002.
Acknowledgement
Richard Amlôt and Holly Carter are affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carter, H., Drury, J., Amlôt, R. (2020). Understanding the Impact of Responder Management Strategies on Public Experiences and Behaviour During Mass Casualty Decontamination. In: Zhu, H., Maibach, H. (eds) Skin Decontamination. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24009-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24009-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24008-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24009-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)