Skip to main content

Understanding the Impact of Responder Management Strategies on Public Experiences and Behaviour During Mass Casualty Decontamination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Skin Decontamination

Abstract

This chapter has three key aims. First, to describe research into likely public behaviour during mass emergencies, and to demonstrate how the way in which an incident is managed will affect the way in which members of the public respond. Second, to highlight how an effective responder management strategy can promote positive public behaviours during mass decontamination. Third, to outline some specific recommendations for optimising the way in which incidents involving mass decontamination are managed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aguirre BE. Commentary on “Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster”. Emergency evacuations, panic, and social psychology. Psychiatry. 2005;68(2):121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguirre BE, Torres MR, Gill KB, Hotchkiss HL. Normative collective behaviour in the station building fire. Soc Sci Q. 2011;92(1):100–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Auf der Heide E. Common misconceptions about disasters: panic, the ‘disaster syndrome’, and looting. In: O’Leary M, editor. The first 72 hours: a community approach to disaster preparedness. Lincoln, Nebraska: iUniverse Publishing; 2004. p. 340–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Public experiences of mass casualty decontamination. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012;10(3):280–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Communication during mass casualty decontamination: highlighting the gaps. Int J Emerg Serv. 2013a;2(1):29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. The effect of communication on anxiety and compliance during mass decontamination. Disaster Prev Manag. 2013b;22(2):132–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter H, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Perceived responder legitimacy and group identification predict cooperation and compliance in a mass decontamination field exercise. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2013c;35(6):575–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Emergency responders’ experiences of and expectations regarding decontamination. Int J Emerg Serv. 2014a;3(2):179–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter H, Drury J, Rubin GJ, Williams R, Amlôt R. Effective responder communication improves efficiency and psychological outcomes in a mass decontamination field experiment: implications for public behaviour in the event of a chemical incident. PLoS One. 2014b;9(3):e89846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter H, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Effective responder communication, perceived responder legitimacy and group identification predict public cooperation and compliance in a mass decontamination visualisation experiment. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2015a;45(3):173–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter H, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Applying crowd psychology to develop recommendations for the management of mass decontamination. Health Secur. 2015b;13(1):45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter H, Amlôt R. Mass casualty decontamination guidance and psychosocial aspects of CBRN incident management: a review and synthesis. PLoS Curr. 2016;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.c2d3d652d9d07a2a620ed5429e017ef5.

  13. Carter H, Weston D, Betts N, Wilkinson S, Amlôt R. Public perceptions of emergency decontamination: effects of intervention type and responder management strategy during a focus group study. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter H, Weston D, Symons C, Amlôt R. Public perceptions of pre-incident information campaign materials for the initial response to a chemical incident: the ‘Remove, Remove, Remove’ campaign. Disaster Prev Manag. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cornish P. The CBRN system: assessing the threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons in the United Kingdom. London: Chatham House; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cornwell B. Panic or situational constraints? The case of the M/V Estonia. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2001;19(1):5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cornwell B. Bonded fatalities: relational and ecological dimensions of a fire evacuation. Sociol Q. 2003;44(4):617–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DiGiovanni C. Domestic terrorism with chemical or biological agents: psychiatric aspects. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;156(10):1500–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Donald I, Canter D. Behavioural aspects of the King’s cross disaster. In: Canter D, editor. Fires and human behaviour. 2nd ed. David Fulton Publishers: London; 1990. p. 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Drury J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2018;29(1):38–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Drury J, Carter H, Cocking C, Ntontis E, Tekin Guven S, Amlôt R. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Front Public Health. (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S. Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009b;48:487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S. The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2009a;27(1):66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S, Burton A, Schofield D, Hardwick A, Graham D, Langston P. Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: a new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model. Behav Res Methods. 2009c;41(3):957–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Drury J, Novelli D, Stott C. Psychological disaster myths in the perception and management of mass emergencies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013;43(11):2259–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Drury J, Reicher S. Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. Br J Soc Psychol. 2000;39:579–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dynes RR. Community emergency planning: false assumptions and inappropriate analogies. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1994;12(2):141–58.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards NA, Caldicott DGE, Eliseo T, Pearce A. Truth hurts – hard lessons from Australia’s largest mass casualty exercise with contaminated patients. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(2):185–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Feinberg WE, Johnson NR. The ties that bind: a macro-level approach to panic. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters, 2001;19(3).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Furedi F. Fear and security: a vulnerability-led policy response. Soc Policy Adm. 2008;42(6):645–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gannt P, Gannt R. Disaster psychology: dispelling the myths of panic. Prof Saf. 2012;2012:42–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hanley C. Residents sickened by pesticide cloud; ag officials insider changing rules. Latino News; 1999. Retrieved 7 October, 2010, from http://wearcam.org/decon/decon_like_rape_dec99.html

  33. Haslam SA, Jetten J, Waghorn C. Social identification, stress and citizenship in teams: a five-phase longitudinal study. Stress Health. 2009;25:21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holloway HC, Norwood AE, Fullerton CS, Engel CC, Ursano RJ. The threat of biological weapons: prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278(5):425–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson NR. Panic at “the who concert stampede”: an empirical assessment. Soc Probl. 1987;34(4):362–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson NR. Fire in a crowded theatre: a descriptive investigation of the emergence of panic. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1988;6(1):7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Levine M, Cassidy C, Brazier G, Reicher S. Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: two experimental studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(7):1452–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher S. Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behaviour. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2005;31:443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Levine M, Thompson K. Identity, place, and bystander intervention: social categories and helping after natural disasters. J Soc Psychol. 2004;144(3):229–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Quarantelli EL. The nature and conditions of panic. Am J Sociol. 1954;60(3):267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Regis E. Evaluating the threat: does mass biopanic portend mass destruction? Sci Am. 2001;285(6):21–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Reicher S. ‘The Battle of Westminster’: developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1996;26:115–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reicher S. The psychology of crowd dynamics. In: Hogg MA, Tindale RS, editors. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stott C, Drury J. Crowds, context and identity: dynamic categorisation processes in the ‘poll tax riot’. Hum Relat. 2000;53:247–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stott C, Hoggett J, Pearson G. ‘Keeping the peace’: social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. Br J Criminol. 2012;52:381–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stott C, Hutchison P, Drury J. ‘Hooligans’ abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective ‘disorder’ at the 1998 World Cup Finals. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:359–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Stott C, Reicher S. How conflict escalates: the inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd ‘violence’. Sociology. 1998;32:353–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tajfel H, Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  50. United States Fire Administration. Fire Department response to biological threat at B’nai B’rith headquarters. Washington, DC: United States Fire Administration; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vogt BM, Sorensen JH. How clean is safe? Improving the effectiveness of decontamination of structures and people following chemical and biological incidents. Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Richard Amlôt and Holly Carter are affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Amlôt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carter, H., Drury, J., Amlôt, R. (2020). Understanding the Impact of Responder Management Strategies on Public Experiences and Behaviour During Mass Casualty Decontamination. In: Zhu, H., Maibach, H. (eds) Skin Decontamination. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24009-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24009-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24008-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24009-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics