Advertisement

Can Text Mining Support Reading Comprehension?

  • Eliseo ReateguiEmail author
  • Daniel Epstein
  • Ederson Bastiani
  • Michel Carniato
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1007)

Abstract

Text mining is a research field that has developed different techniques to find relevant information in unstructured data, such as texts. This article tries to verify whether the automatic extraction of information from texts can help students in reading comprehension activities. Two studies involving control and experimental groups were carried out with students of 5th and 8th grade in order to evaluate whether a particular text mining tool could effectively help students improve their scores in a reading task. We also wanted to verify if the use of the tool by students in different grades could yield different outcomes. Results showed that the mining tool helped 5th graders to improve their scores, but it was not so effective for 8th graders. These results indicate the potential of the proposed tool especially for learners who are still developing their reading skills.

Keywords

Reading comprehension Text mining Graphic organizers Literacy 

References

  1. 1.
    Allahyari, M., et al.: A brief survey of text mining: classification, clustering and extraction techniques. In: Proceedings of Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD, Halifax, Canada (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beers, K.: When Kids Can’t Read. What Teachers Can Do. Heinemann, Portsmouth (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Block, C.C., Pressley, M.: Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices. Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. Guilford Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T., Chen, S.F.: Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 17(1), 21–33 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chein, M., Mugnier, M.-L.: Graph-Based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs, 1st edn. Springer, London (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cordón, L.A., Day, J.D.: Strategy use on standardized reading comprehension tests. J. Educ. Psychol. 88(2), 288–295 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Giacomo, D., Cofini, V., Di Mascio, T., Rosita, C.M., Fiorenzi, D., Gennari, R., Vittorini, P.: The silent reading supported by adaptive learning technology: influence in the children outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55(1), 1125–1130 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guastello, E.F., Beasley, T.M., Sinatra, R.C.: Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial Spec. Educ. 21(6), 356–364 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, T., Strangman, N.: Graphic organizers. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, Wakefield (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    He, W.: Examining students’ online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 90–102 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsu, J.-L., Chou, H.-W., Chang, H.-H.: EduMiner: using text mining for automatic formative assessment. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 3431–3439 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hyerle, D.: Visual Tools for Transforming Information Into Knowledge. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jamshidifarsani, H., Garbaya, S., Lim, T., Blazevic, P., Ritchie, J.M.: Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: an analytical review. Comput. Educ. 128(1), 427–451 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenner, J.: A bridge to reading and writing literacy: developing oral language skills in young children. Pacific Educator (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manoli, P., Papadopoulou, M.: Graphic organizers as a reading strategy: research findings and issues. Creative Educ. 3, 348–356 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., Pollock, J.E.: Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nandhini, K., Balasundaram, S.R.: Improving readability through extractive summaries for learners with reading difficulties. Egyptian Inform. J. 14(1), 195–204 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH Publication. No. 00-4769 (2000)  https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950070418
  19. 19.
    Nesbit, J.C., Adesope, O.O.: Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. J. Rev. Educ. Res. 76(3), 413–448 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reader, W., Hammond, N.: Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Comput. Educ. 12, 99–106 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reategui, E., Epstein, D., Lorenzatti, A., Klemann, M., Sobek: a text mining tool for educational applications. In: International Conference on Data Mining, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 59–64 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roman-Sanchez, J.M.: Self-regulated learning procedure for university students: the meaningful text-reading strategy. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 2(1), 113–132 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Romero, C., Cazorla, M., Buzón, O.: Meaninful learning using concept maps as a learning strategy. J. Technol. Sci. 7(3), 313–332 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schenker, A.: Graph-theoretic techniques for web content mining. Ph.D. thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shatnawi, S., Gaber, M.M., Cocea, M.: Text stream mining for massive open online courses: review and perspectives. Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 2(1), 664–676 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sweeny, S.M.: Writing for the instant messaging and text messaging generation: using new literacies to support writing instruction. J. Adolesc. Adult Literacy 54(2), 121–130 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tankersley, K.: The Threads of Reading: Strategies for Literacy Development. ASDC, Alexandria (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tovani, C.: I Read But I Don’t Get It. Comprehension Strategies for Young Adolescent Readers. Stenhouse Publishers, Portsmouth (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trend, D.: The End of Reading: From Gutenberg to Grand Theft Auto. Peter Lang Publishing, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Warschauer, Mark: Laptops and Literacy: Learning in the Wireless Classroom. Teachers College Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wiecha, J.L., Sobol, A.M., Peterson, K.E., Gortmaker, S.L.: Household television access: associations with screen time, reading and homework among youth. Ambul. Pediatr. 1(5), 244–251 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu, Y., Reynolds, N.: Using text mining techniques to analyze students’ written responses to a teacher leadership dilemma. Int. J. Comput. Theory Eng. 4(4), 575 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yu, C.H., DiGangi, S.A., Jannasch-Pennell, A.: Using text mining for improving student experience management in higher education. In: Tripathi, P., Mukerji, S. (eds.) Cases on Innovations in Educational Marketing: Transnational and Technological Strategies, pp. 196–213. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-599-5.ch012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliseo Reategui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Epstein
    • 1
  • Ederson Bastiani
    • 1
  • Michel Carniato
    • 2
  1. 1.PPGIE, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations