Skip to main content

Performance Analytical Comparison of Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies in Computing (iCETiC 2019)


Both blockchain technologies and cloud computing are contemporary emerging technologies. While the application of Blockchain technologies is being spread beyond cryptocurrency, cloud computing is also seeing a paradigm shift to meet the needs of the 4th industrial revolution (Industry 4.0). New technological advancement, especially by the fusion of these two, such as Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS), is considered to be able to significantly generate values to the enterprises. This article surveys the current status of BaaS in terms of technological development, applications, market potentials and so forth. An evaluative judgement, comparing amongst various BaaS platforms, has been presented, along with the trajectory of adoption, challenges and risk factors. Finally, the study suggests standardisation of available BaaS platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, October 2008.

  2. Miraz, M.H., Ali, M.: Applications of blockchain technology beyond cryptocurrency. Ann. Emerg. Technol. Comput. 2, 1–6 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donald, D.C., Miraz, M.H.: Restoring Direct Holdings and Unified Pricing to Securities Markets with Distributed Ledger Technology. Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miraz, M.H., Donald, D.C.: Application of blockchain in booking and registration systems of securities exchanges. In: IEEE International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (IEEE iCCECE 2018), pp. 35–40. IEEE, University of Essex, Southend (2018).

  5. Onik, M.M.H., Miraz, M.H., Kim, C.-S.: A recruitment and human resource management technique using blockchain technology for industry 4.0. In: Proceedings of the Smart Cities Symposium (SCS-2018), pp. 11–16. IET, Manama, Bahrain (2018).

  6. Onik, M.M.H., Aich, S., Yang, J., Kim, C.-S., Kim, H.-C.: Blockchain in healthcare: challenges and solutions. In: Big Data Analytics for Intelligent Healthcare Management, pp. 197–226. Elsevier, London (2019).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, J., Onik, M., Lee, N.-Y., Ahmed, M., Kim, C.-S.: Proof-of-familiarity: a privacy-preserved blockchain scheme for collaborative medical decision-making. Appl. Sci. 9, 1370 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Zaben, N., Onik, M.M.H., Yang, J., Lee, N.-Y., Kim, C.-S.: General data protection regulation complied blockchain architecture for personally identifiable information management. In: International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering 2018 (iCCECE 2018), pp. 72–88. IEEE, Southend (2018).

  9. Onik, M.M.H., Kim, C.-S., Lee, N.-Y., Yang, J.: Privacy-aware blockchain for personal data sharing and tracking. Open Comput. Sci. 9, 80–91 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Onik, M.M.H., Ahmed, M.: Blockchain in the era of industry 4.0. In: Mohiuddin Ahmed, A.-S.K.P. (ed.) Data Analytics: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications, pp. 259–298. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miraz, M.H., Ali, M.: Blockchain enabled enhanced IoT ecosystem security. In: International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Computing 2018 (iCETiC 2018), pp. 38–46. IEEE, London Metropolitan University, London (2018).

  12. Miraz, M.H.: Blockchain: Technology Fundamentals of the Trust Machine. Machine Lawyering, Chinese University Hong Kong, 23 December 2017.

  13. Mccallister, E., Grance, T., Scarfone, K.: Guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010).

  14. Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ali, M., Miraz, M.H.: Cloud computing applications. In: Manikandan, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and eGovernance, pp. 1–8. Internet City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ali, M., Miraz, M.H.: Recent advances in cloud computing applications and services. Int. J. Cloud Comput. (IJCC) 1, 1–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Global Market for Blockchain (2018–2023): Projected to Expand at a CAGR of 80.2% - | Business Wire.

  18. Samaniego, M., Deters, R.: Blockchain as a Service for IoT (2016).

  19. Rimba, P., Tran, A., Weber, I., Staples, M., Ponomarev, A., Xu, X.: Comparing blockchain and cloud services for business process execution (2017).

  20. Lahiri, S.K., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Dillig, I.: Formal Specification and Verification of Smart Contracts for Azure Blockchain (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blockchain Technology and Applications | Microsoft Azure.

  22. Philip, J., Shah, D.: Implementing signature recognition system as SaaS on microsoft azure cloud. In: Balas, V.E., Sharma, N., Chakrabarti, A. (eds.) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. AISC, vol. 808, pp. 479–488. Springer, Singapore (2019).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Azure Integration Opens Blockchain Firm Kaleido to 80% of Cloud Market – CoinDesk.

  24. Blockchain on AWS.

  25. Everything Enterprises Need to Know About Amazon’s Blockchain as a Service.

  26. Buyya, R., Ranjan, R., Calheiros, R.N.: InterCloud: utility-oriented federation of cloud computing environments for scaling of application services. In: Hsu, C.-H., Yang, L.T., Park, J.H., Yeo, S.-S. (eds.) ICA3PP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6081, pp. 13–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Narayanaswami, C., Nooyi, R., Raghavan, S.G., Viswanathan, R.: Blockchain Anchored Supply Chain Automation (2019).

  28. IBM Blockchain Platform | IBM.

  29. IBM Blockchain Platform locations.

  30. IBM Blockchain Platform 2.0 Beta: Run your blockchain N/W in 10 Simple Steps.

  31. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Introduces Blockchain as-a-Service Solution for Enterprises NYSE:HPE.

  32. Blockchain Cloud Service | Oracle Cloud.

  33. What is a Blockchain Oracle? – Leon Johnson – Medium.

  34. SAP Blockchain Applications and Services.

  35. SAP HANA Blockchain: Technical Overview | SAP Blogs.

  36. Kotas, C., Naughton, T., Imam, N.: A comparison of Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure cloud platforms for high performance computing (2018).

  37. Sefraoui, O., Aissaoui, M., Eleuldj, M.: Comparison of multiple iaas cloud platform solutions. In: WSEAS (2012).

  38. Fowley, F., Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P., Fang, D., Liu, X.: A classification and comparison framework for cloud service brokerage architectures (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khelaifa, A., Benharzallah, S., Kahloul, L., Euler, R., Laouid, A., Bounceur, A.: A comparative analysis of adaptive consistency approaches in cloud storage. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 129, 36–49 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh, I., Lee, S.-W.: Comparative requirements analysis for the feasibility of blockchain for secure cloud. In: Kamalrudin, M., Ahmad, S., Ikram, N. (eds.) APRES 2017.CCIS, vol. 809, pp. 57–72. Springer, Singapore (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. AWS vs AZURE vs Oracle Blockchain Solution Offering: Comparison.

  42. Miraz, M.H., Donald, D.C.: LApps: technological, legal and market potentials of blockchain lightning network applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining (ICISDM2019). ACM, University of Houston, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miraz, M., Donald, D.C.: Atomic cross-chain swaps: development, trajectory and potential of non-monetary digital token swap facilities. Ann. Emerg. Technol. Comput. 3, 11–18 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miraz, M.H., Excell, P.S.: Evaluation of green alternatives for blockchain Proof-of-Work (PoW) approach. In: International Conference on Green Communications and Computing (MIC-Green 2019), Istanbul, Turkey (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Onik, M.M.H., Al-Zaben, N., Phan Hoo, H., Kim, C.-S.: MUXER—a new equipment for energy saving in ethernet. Technologies 5, 74 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi H. Miraz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Onik, M.M.H., Miraz, M.H. (2019). Performance Analytical Comparison of Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) Platforms. In: Miraz, M., Excell, P., Ware, A., Soomro, S., Ali, M. (eds) Emerging Technologies in Computing. iCETiC 2019. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 285. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23942-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23943-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics