Advertisement

Linking International Trade to Climate Change and Energy

Chapter
  • 427 Downloads
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR)

Abstract

The argument goes that the causes of environmental problems in a market economy are economics and that the consequences of environmental problems have important economic dimensions that travel from producers to consumers of good and services. Hence, the importance of solutions that are environmentally effective, economically sensible, and politically pragmatic. In the specific case of trade, traditionally, the thinking has been that more trade meant more energy consumption and therefore higher levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Economic growth has come at a cost to the environment. But it does not have to be that way. Trade can be part of the solution to reducing GHG emissions by providing preferential treatment to green goods/services in trade agreements, leading consumers to buy green goods such as electric cars.

References

  1. Abbott KW (2012) The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 30(4):571–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott K (2014) Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnatl Environ Law 3:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott K, Snidal D (2009) The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: Mattli W, Woods N (eds) The politics of global regulation. Princeton University Press, pp 44–88Google Scholar
  4. Abbott KW, Snidal D (2010) International regulation without international government: improving io performance through orchestration. Rev Int Organ 5(3):315–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abbott KW, Green J, Keohane R (2016) Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. Int OrganGoogle Scholar
  6. Abu Gosh E, Leal-Arcas R (2013) The conservation of exhaustible natural resources in the GATT and WTO: implications for the conservation of oil resources. J World Invest Trade 14(3):480–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Akerlof G, Shiller R (2015) Phishing for phools: the economics of manipulation and deceptionGoogle Scholar
  8. Albareda L, Waddock S (2016) Networked CSR governance: a whole network approach to meta-governance. Bus SocGoogle Scholar
  9. Alter K, Meunier S (2009) The politics of international regime complexity. Perspect Polit 7(1):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anceschi L et al (eds) (2011) Energy security in the era of climate change: the Asia-Pacific experience. PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  11. Andrew R, Davis S, Peters GP (2013) Climate policy and dependence on traded carbon. Environ Res Lett 8:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Andrews-Speed P (ed) (2008) International competition for resources: the role of the law, the state, and of markets. Dundee University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Araya M (2016) The relevance of the environmental goods agreement in advancing the Paris Agreement Goals and SDGs. A Focus on Clean Energy and Costa Rica’s Experience. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. Archer D (2016) The long thaw: how humans are changing the next 100,000 years of Earth’s climate. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Asif M, Muneer T (2007) Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(7):1388–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ayres R (1996) Limits to the growth paradigm. Ecol Econ 19:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Babiker M, Rutherford T (2005) The economic effects of border measures in subglobal climate agreements. Energy J 26(4):99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bacchus J (2018a) The willing world: shaping and sharing a sustainable global prosperity. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Bacchus J (2018b) Triggering the trade transition: the G20’s role in reconciling rules for trade and climate change. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  20. Bak C (2015) Growth, innovation and trade in environmental goods. Center for International Governance InnovationGoogle Scholar
  21. Barnett J, Neil Adger W (2007) Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Polit Geogr 26:639–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bartels L (2005) Human rights conditionality in the EU’s international agreements. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Bartels L (2015) In: Lester S, Mercurio B, Bartels L (eds) Social issues in regional trade agreements: labour, environment and human rights, in bilateral and regional trade agreements, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  24. Baumol W (1972) On taxation and the control of externalities. Am Econ Rev 62(3):307–322Google Scholar
  25. Baumol W, Oates W (1971) The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. Swedish J Econ 73(1):42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Beckfield J (2010) The social structure of the world polity. Am J Sociol 115(4):1018–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Berliner D, Prakash A (2014) The United Nations global compact: an institutionalist perspective. J Bus Ethics 122(2):217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bernstein S, Cashore B (2004) Non-state global governance: is forest certification a legitimate alternative to a global forest convention? Hard choices, soft law: voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance, pp 33–63Google Scholar
  29. Bodansky D (2016) The Paris Climate Change Agreement: a new hope? Am J Int Law 110(2):288–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bodansky D et al (2017) International climate change law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environ Change 19(3):366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Bordoff JE (2009) International trade law and the economics of climate policy: evaluating the legality and effectiveness of proposals to address competitiveness and leakage concerns. In: Brainard L, Sorkin I (eds) Climate change, trade and competitiveness: is a collision inevitable? Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Borgatti SP, Jones C, Everett MG (1998) Network measures of social capital. Connections 21(2):27–36Google Scholar
  34. Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Bosello F, Boson R, Tol RSJ (2006) Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: human health. Ecol Econ 58:579–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Boyd W (2010) Climate change, fragmentation, and the challenges of global environmental law: elements of as post-copenhagen assemblage. Univ Pa J Int Law 32(2):457–550Google Scholar
  37. Bradbook A, Wahnschafft R (2012) International law and global sustainable energy production and consumption. In: Bradbrook A et al (eds) The law of energy for sustainable development. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Bradbrook AJ (1996) Energy law as an academic discipline. J Energy Nat Resour Law 14(2):193, 197Google Scholar
  39. Bradbrook A (2011) Creating law for next generation energy technologies. Colo J Int Environ Law Policy 22:251Google Scholar
  40. Brandi C (2017) Trade elements in countries’ climate contributions under the Paris Agreement. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  41. Brewer T (2011) Climate change technology transfer: a new paradigm and policy agenda. Climate Policy 8(5):516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Brown Weiss E (2011) The evolution of international environmental law. Jpn Yearb Int Law 54:1–27Google Scholar
  43. Bruce S (2013) International law and renewable energy: facilitating sustainable energy for all? Melbourne J Int Law 18Google Scholar
  44. Bulkeley H et al (2012) Governing climate change transnationally: assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 30(4):591–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Burniaux JM, Chateau J (2014) Greenhouse gases mitigation potential and economic efficiency of phasing-out fossil fuel subsidies. Int Econ 140:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Cameron P (2010) International energy investment law: the pursuit of stability. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Carlarne C (2008) Good climate governance: only a fragmented system of international law away? Law Policy 30(4):450–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2008) Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecol Soc 13(2):40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Cherp A, Jewell J (2014) The concept of energy security: beyond the four as. Energy Policy 75:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Cherp A, Jewell J, Goldthau A (2011) Governing global energy: systems, transitions, complexity. Global Policy 2(1):75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Condon BJ (2017) Disciplining clean energy subsidies to speed the transition to a low-carbon world. J World Trade 51:675, 690Google Scholar
  52. Copper J (2016) China’s foreign aid and investment diplomacy, vol 1. Palgrave McMillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  53. Cosbey A (2016) The trade implications of the Paris COP21 Agreement. International Trade Working Paper, No. 2016/17. Commonwealth Secretariat, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Cottier T, Malumfashi G, Matteotti-Berkutova S, Nartova O, de Sépibus J, Bigdeli SZ (2011) Energy in WTO law and policy. In: Cottier T, Delimatsis P (eds) The prospects of international trade regulation: from fragmentation to coherence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Croquet N (2015) The climate-change norms under the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement: between soft and hard law. In: Wouters J, Marx A, Geraerts D, Natens B (eds) Global governance through trade EU policies and approaches. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 124–157Google Scholar
  56. Daly H (1997) Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Beacon PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Dam S, Tewary V (2005) Is a ‘polluted’ constitution worse than a polluted environment? J Environ Law 17:383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Dashwood H (2014) Sustainable development and industry self-regulation: developments in the global mining sector. Bus Soc 53(4):551–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. David T, Westerhuis G (2014) The power of corporate networks: a comparative and historical perspective, vol 26. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  60. De Brabandere E, Gazzini T (eds) (2014) Foreign investment in the energy sector: balancing private and public interests. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  61. Di Leva C, Shi X (2016) The Paris Agreement and the international trade regime: considerations for harmonization. Sustain Dev Law Policy Brief XVII(1)Google Scholar
  62. Di Leva CE, Shi X (2017) The Paris Agreement and the international trade regime: considerations for harmonization. Sustain Dev Law Policy 17(1)Google Scholar
  63. Dine J (2005) Companies, international trade, and human rights. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Druzin BH (2016) A plan to strengthen the Paris Climate Agreement. Fordham Law Rev Res Gestae 84:18–23Google Scholar
  65. Dubash N, Florini A (2006) Mapping global energy governance. Global Policy 2:6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Dupuy PM, Vinuales J (2018) International environmental law. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  67. Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  68. Eberlein B, Abbott KW, Black J, Meidinger E, Wood S (2013) Transnational business governance interactions: conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regul GovGoogle Scholar
  69. Ekins P (1994) The impact of carbon taxation on the UK economy. Energy Policy 22(7):571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ekins P (1999) European environmental taxes and charges: recent experience, issues and trends. Ecol Econ 31:39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ekins P (2009) Resource productivity, environmental tax reform and sustainable growth in Europe. Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial SocietyGoogle Scholar
  72. Esty D (1994) Greening the GATT: trade, environment, and the future. Washington, D.C., Peterson Institute for International EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  73. Esty DC (2002) The World Trade Organization’s legitimacy crisis. World Trade Rev 1(1):7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Esty D (2017) Red lights to green lights: from 20th century environmental regulation to 21st century sustainability. Environ Law Rev 47(1):41–42. https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/23903-47-1estypdf Google Scholar
  75. Faber M et al (1990) Economy-environment interactions in the long-run: a neo-Austrian approach. Ecol Econ 2:27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Faure M, De Smedt P, Stas A (2015) Environmental enforcement networks: concepts, implementation and effectiveness. Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
  77. Fenwick M, Van Uytsel S, Wrbka S (2014) Introduction: networks and networked governance. Networked governance, transnational business and the law. Springer, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  78. Florini A, Sovacool BK (2009) Who governs energy? The challenges facing global energy governance. Energy Policy 37(12):5239–5248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Florini A, Sovacool BK (2011) Bridging the gaps in global energy governance. Global Gov 17:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Fransen L, Burgoon B (2014) Privatizing or socializing corporate responsibility: business participation in voluntary programs. Bus Soc 53(4):583–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. French D (2006) Supporting the principle of integration in the furtherance of sustainable development: a sideways glance. Environ Law Manage 18(3):103–117Google Scholar
  82. Frey C (2016) Tackling climate change through the elimination of trade barriers for low-carbon goods: multilateral, plurilateral and regional approaches. In: Mauerhofer V (ed) Legal aspects of sustainable development. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  83. Gault J (2010) A word of introduction from the energy industry perspective. In: Pauwelyn J (ed) Global challenges at the intersection of trade, energy and the environment. The Graduate Institute, Geneva, p 9Google Scholar
  84. Gehring T, Faude B (2013) The dynamics of regime complexes: microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Gov: Rev Multilateralism Int Organ 19(1):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Goh G (2004) The World Trade Organization, Kyoto and energy tax adjustments at the border. J World Trade 38(3):395–423Google Scholar
  86. Goulder LH, Stavins RN (2011) Challenges from state-federal interactions in U.S. climate change policy. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 101(3):253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Graetz MJ (2011) The end of energy: the unmaking of America’s environment, security, and independence. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Green J (2010) Private standards in the climate regime: the greenhouse gas protocol. Bus Polit 12(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Green JF (2013) Order out of chaos: public and private rules for managing carbon. Global Environ Polit 13(2):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Gunningham N (2012) Confronting the challenge of energy governance. Transnatl Environ Law 1:119, 130–131Google Scholar
  91. Haas R, Eichhamer W, Huber C, Langniss O, Lorenzoni A, Madlener R, Menanteau P, Morthorst PE, Martins A, Oniszk A, Schleich J, Smith A, Vass Z, Verbruggen A (2004) How to promote renewable energy systems successfully and effectively. Energy Policy 32(6):833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Haas R, Panzer C, Resch G, Ragwitz M, Busch S, Held A (2011) Efficiency and effectiveness of promotion systems for electricity generation from renewable energy sources – lessons from EU countries. Energy 36(4):2186–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Haghighi S (2007) Energy security: the external legal relations of the European Union with major oil and gas supplying countries. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  94. Haites E et al (2018) Experience with carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum XXIX:109–182Google Scholar
  95. Hale T, Roger C (2014) Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Rev Int Organ 9(1):59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Halliday T, Shaffer G (eds) (2015) Transnational legal orders. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  97. Handl G (2001) Human rights and protection of the environment. In: Eide A, Krause C, Rosas A (eds) Economic, social and cultural rights: a textbook, 2nd edn. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  98. Hawken P (2010) The ecology of commerce: a declaration of sustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  99. Heemskerk E, Fennema M, Carroll WK (2016) The global corporate elite after the financial crisis: evidence from the transnational network of interlocking directorates. Global Netw 16(1):68–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Held A, Ragwitz M, Haas R (2006) On the success of policy strategies for the promotion of electricity from renewable energy sources in the EU. Energy Environ:849Google Scholar
  101. Hollo E et al (eds) (2013) Climate change and the law. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  102. Holzinger K (2008) Transnational common goods: strategic constellations, collective action problems, and multi-level provision. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  103. Huang H et al (2011) Climate change and trade in agriculture. Food Policy 36(1):S9–S13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Hufbauer GC, Kim J (2009) The World Trade Organization and climate change: challenges and options. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Working Paper Series, WP 09-9. Available at https://piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/wp/wp09-9.pdf
  105. Hughes C (2018) Fair shot: rethinking inequality and how we earn. St. Martin’s PressGoogle Scholar
  106. ICTSD (2011) Fostering low carbon growth: the case for a sustainable energy trade agreement. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, GenevaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Jacobs M, Mazzucato M (eds) (2016) Rethinking capitalism: economics and policy for sustainable and inclusive growth. Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  108. Janssen MA et al (2006) Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Jegen M (2010) Two paths to energy security: the EU and NAFTA. Int J 66:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Jinnah S, Morgera E (2013) Environmental provisions in American and EU Free Trade Agreements: a preliminary comparison and research agenda. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 22(13):324–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Jupille J, Mattli W, Snidal D (2013) Institutional choice and global commerce. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  112. Katz DM, Stafford D (2010) Hustle and flow: a social network analysis of the American federal judiciary. Ohio State Law J 71(3)Google Scholar
  113. Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern MA (1999) Defining global public goods. In: Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern MA (eds) Global public goods: international cooperation in the 21st century. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  114. Kendall K (2012) Carbon taxes and the WTO: a carbon charge without trade concerns? Arizona J Int Comp Law 29:49 at 51ffGoogle Scholar
  115. Keohane RO, Victor DG (2011) The regime complex for climate change. Perspect Polit 9(1):7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Kim RE (2013–14) The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environ Change 23(5):980–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Kissinger H (2014) World order: reflections on the character of nations and the course of history. Allen LaneGoogle Scholar
  118. Kottari M, Roumeliotis P (2013) Renewable energy governance: challenges within a “puzzled” institutional map. In: Michalena E, Maxwell Hills J (eds) Renewable energy governance: complexities and challenges. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  119. Krasner S (ed) (1983) International regimes. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  120. Kravchenko S, Bonine JE (2008) Human rights and the environment: cases, law and policy. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  121. Laruelle M, Peyrouse S (2012) The Chinese question in Central Asia: domestic order, social change, and the Chinese factor. Hurst Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  122. Leal W, Leal-Arcas R (eds) (2018) University initiatives in climate change mitigation and adaptation. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  123. Leal-Arcas R (2008) Theory and practice of EC external trade law and policy. Cameron MayGoogle Scholar
  124. Leal-Arcas R (2009) The multilateralization of international investment law. N C J Int Law Commer Regul 35(1):33–135Google Scholar
  125. Leal-Arcas R (2010a) Kyoto and the COPs: lessons learned and looking ahead. Hague Yearb Int Law 23:17–90Google Scholar
  126. Leal-Arcas R (2010b) International trade and investment law: multilateral, regional and bilateral governance. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  127. Leal-Arcas R (2012a) Unilateral trade-related climate change measures. J World Invest Trade 13(6):875–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Leal-Arcas R (2012b) The role of the European Union and China in global climate change negotiations: a critical analysis. J Eur Integrat Hist 18(1):67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Leal-Arcas R (2013a) Climate change and international trade. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Leal-Arcas R (2013b) Climate change mitigation from the bottom up: using preferential trade agreements to promote climate change mitigation. Carbon Climate Law Rev 7(1):34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Leal-Arcas R (2013c) Working together: how to make trade contribute to climate action. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Information Note No. 18, pp 1–8, Geneva, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  132. Leal-Arcas R (2014) Trade proposals for climate action. Trade Law Dev 6(1):11–54Google Scholar
  133. Leal-Arcas R (2015a) Mega-regionals and sustainable development: the transatlantic trade and investment partnership and the trans-pacific partnership. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 4:248Google Scholar
  134. Leal-Arcas R (2015b) Mega-regionals and sustainable development: the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 6(4):248–264Google Scholar
  135. Leal-Arcas R (2016) The European Energy Union: the quest for secure, affordable and sustainable energy. Claeys & Casteels PublishingGoogle Scholar
  136. Leal-Arcas R (2017) Sustainability, common concern and public goods. George Wash Int Law Rev 49(4):801–877Google Scholar
  137. Leal-Arcas R (ed) (2018) Commentary on the Energy Charter Treaty. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  138. Leal-Arcas R (2019) EU trade law. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  139. Leal-Arcas R, Alvarez Armas E (2018) The climate-energy-trade nexus in EU external relations. In: Minas S, Ntousas V (eds) EU climate diplomacy: politics, law and negotiations. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  140. Leal-Arcas R, Filis A (2013a) Conceptualizing EU energy security through an EU constitutional law perspective. Fordham Int Law J 36(5):1225–1301Google Scholar
  141. Leal-Arcas R, Filis A (2013b) The fragmented governance of the global energy economy: a legal-institutional analysis. J World Energy Law Bus 6(4):348–405, Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Leal-Arcas R, Minas S (2016) Mapping the international and European governance of renewable energy. Oxford Yearb Eur Law 35(1):621–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Leal-Arcas R, Morelli A (2018) The resilience of the Paris Agreement: negotiating and implementing the climate regime. Georgetown Environ Law Rev 31(1):1–63Google Scholar
  144. Leal-Arcas R, Wilmarth C (2015) Strengthening sustainable development through preferential trade agreements. In: Wouters J et al (eds) Ensuring good global governance through trade: EU policies and approaches, vol 92Google Scholar
  145. Leal-Arcas R, Wouters J (eds) (2017) Research handbook on EU energy law and policy. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  146. Leal-Arcas R et al (2014) International energy governance: selected legal issues. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  147. Leal-Arcas R et al (2016) Energy security, trade and the EU: regional and international perspectives. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  148. Leal-Arcas R, Lasniewska F, Proedrou F (2018) Smart grids in the European Union: assessing energy security, regulation & social and ethical considerations. Columbia J Eur Law 24(2)Google Scholar
  149. Lee N, Kirkpatrick C (2001) Methodologies for sustainability impact assessments of proposals for new trade agreements. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 3:395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Lewis JI (2014) The rise of renewable energy protectionism: emerging trade conflicts and implications for low carbon development. Global Environ PolitGoogle Scholar
  151. Lilliston B (2016) The climate cost of free trade: how the TPP and trade deals undermine the Paris climate agreement. Institute for Agriculture and Trade PolicyGoogle Scholar
  152. Luciani G (2013) Security of oil supplies: issues & remedies. Claeys & CasteelsGoogle Scholar
  153. Martin L, Simmons B (1998) Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. Int Organ 52(2):397–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Matisoff D (2010) Are international environmental agreements enforceable? Implications for institutional design. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 10(3):165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Mayer B (2018) The international law on climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  156. McKenzie L (2018) Overcoming legacies of foreign policy (dis)interests in the negotiation of the European Union-Australia free trade agreement. Aust J Int Aff 72(3):255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Meidinger E (2011) Forest certification and democracy. Eur J Forest Res 130(3):407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Meyer T (2012) Global public goods, governance risk, and international energy. Duke J Comp Int Law 22:319–348Google Scholar
  159. Meyer T (2013) The architecture of international energy governance. Am Soc Int Law Proc 106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Milanovic B (2018) Global inequality: a new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  161. Miller T (2017) China’s Asian Dream: empire building along the new silk road. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  162. Moe E, Midford P (2014) The political economy of renewable energy and energy security: common challenges and national responses in Japan, China and Northern Europe. PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  163. Morin J-F, Jinnah S (2018) The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance. Environ Polit 27(3):541–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Morosini F (2010) Trade and climate change: unveiling the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities from the WTO Agreements. George Wash Int Law Rev 42:713–748Google Scholar
  165. Newman A, Zaring DT (2013) Regulatory networks: power, legitimacy, and compliance. In: Dunoff J, Pollack M (eds) Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, p 244Google Scholar
  166. Nordhaus W (2007) To tax or not to tax. Rev Environ Econ PolicyGoogle Scholar
  167. Nordhaus W, Merrill S, Beaton P (eds) (2013) Effects of U.S. tax policy on greenhouse gas emissions. The National Academy Press. Available at https://smarterfuelfuture.org/assets/content/NRC_GHG_-_July_2013.pdf
  168. O’Sullivan M (2017) Windfall: how the new energy abundance upends global politics and strengthens America’s power. Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar
  169. Odell J (2018) Our alarming crisis demands border adjustments now. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  170. Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  171. Omorogbe YO (2008) Promoting sustainable development through the use of renewable energy: the role of the law. In: Zillman D, Redgwell C, Omorogbe Y, Barrera-Hernández LK (eds) Beyond the carbon economy: energy law in transition, p 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Orsini A, Morin J-F, Young O (2013a) Regime complexes: a buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Gov: Rev Multilateralism Int Organ 19(1):27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Orsini A et al (2013b) Regime complexes: a buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Gov 14:419–435Google Scholar
  174. Oschmann V (2008) Introduction to European law on renewable energy sources. In: Parker L, Ronk J, Maxwell R (eds) From debate to design: issues in clean energy and climate change law and policy. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, p 19Google Scholar
  175. Osofsky H (2007) Local approaches to transnational corporate responsibility: mapping the role of subnational climate change litigation. Pac McGeorge Global Bus Dev Law J 20:143–159Google Scholar
  176. Ostrom E (2009) A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Policy Research Working Paper 5095. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  177. Ottinger R (2013) Renewable energy law and development: case study analysis. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  178. Overdevest C, Zeitlin J (2012) Assembling an experimentalist regime: transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regul GovGoogle Scholar
  179. Padilla E (2002) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecol Econ 41:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Palmer G (1992) The earth summit: what went wrong at Rio? Wash Univ Law Q 70:1005Google Scholar
  181. Pattberg P, Stripple J (2008) Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 8(4):367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Pauwelyn J (2012) Carbon leakage measures and border tax adjustments under WTO law. In: Prevost D, Van Calster G (eds) Research handbook on environment, health and the WTOGoogle Scholar
  183. Peat D (2012) The wrong rules for the right energy: the WTO SCM agreement and subsidies for renewable energy. Environ Law Manage 24:3–10Google Scholar
  184. Perez O (2004) Ecological sensitivity and global legal pluralism: rethinking the trade and environment conflict. Hart Publishing, pp 8–9Google Scholar
  185. Perez O (2012) International environmental law as a field of multi-polar governance: the case of private transnational environmental regulation. Santa Clara J Int Law 10:285Google Scholar
  186. Peters G, Hertwich E (2006) Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environ Change 16:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Petersmann E-U (2000) From ‘negative’ to ‘positive’ integration in the WTO: time for ‘mainstreaming human rights’ into WTO law? Common Market Law Rev 37:1363–1382Google Scholar
  188. Pontin B (2002) Environmental rights under the UK’s ‘intermediate constitution’. Nat Res Environ 17:21Google Scholar
  189. Popovski V (ed) (2018) The implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change (law, ethics and governance). RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  190. Potoski M, Prakash A (2013) Do voluntary programs reduce pollution? Examining ISO 14001’s effectiveness across countries. Policy Stud J 41(2):273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Prag A (2017) Trade and SDG 13 – Action on Climate Change. Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper 735. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo. Available at https://www.adb.org/publications/tradeand-sdg-13-action-climate-change Google Scholar
  192. Raustiala K, Victor DG (2004) The regime complex for plant genetic resources. Int Organ 58(2):277–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Raworth K (2017) Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green PublishingGoogle Scholar
  194. Richardson A (2009) Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: a social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting. Account Organ Soc 34(5):571–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Rodrik D (2011) The globalization paradox: democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton & Co, NYGoogle Scholar
  196. Roehrkasten S (2015) Global governance on renewable energy: contrasting the ideas of the Germand and Brazilian governments. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  197. Sabel CF, Zeitlin J (2011) Experimentalism in transnational governance: emergent pathways and diffusion mechanisms. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  198. Sandler T (2004) Global collective action. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  199. Sands B, Peel J (2012) Principles of international environmental law, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Sax J (2000) Environmental law at the turn of the century: a reportorial fragment of contemporary history. Calif Law Rev 88(6):2375–2402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Schrijver N (1997) Sovereignty over natural resources: balancing rights and duties. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Slaughter A-M (2002) Global government networks, global information agencies, and disaggregated democracy. Mich J Int Law 24:1041Google Scholar
  203. Slaughter A-M (2004) A new world order. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  204. Slaughter A-M, Zaring DT (2006) Networking goes international: an update. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 2Google Scholar
  205. Snir R, Ravid G (2015) Global nanotechnology regulatory governance from a network analysis perspective. Regul GovGoogle Scholar
  206. Sofiev M et al (2018) Cleaner fules for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nat Commun 9(406):1–12Google Scholar
  207. Sovacool B (2017) Reviewing, reforming, and rethinking global energy subsidies: towards a political economy research agenda. Ecol Econ 135:150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Sovacool B, Florini A (2012) Examining the complications of global energy governance. J Energy Nat Resour Law 30(3):235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Stern N et al (2018) Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change 8:669–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Sugiyama T, Sinton J (2005) Orchestra of treaties: a future climate regime scenario with multiple treaties among like-minded countries. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 5(1):65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Summers L (2016) The age of secular stagnation: what it is and what to do about it. Foreign AffGoogle Scholar
  212. Tagliapietra S (2012) The geoeconomics of sovereign wealth funds and renewable energy. Claeys & CasteelsGoogle Scholar
  213. Taylor M (1987) The possibility of cooperation. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  214. Taylor J, Van Doren P (2008) The energy security obsession. Georgetown J Law Public Policy 6:475Google Scholar
  215. Thistlethwaite J, Paterson M (2015) Private governance and accounting for sustainability networks. Environ Plan C: Gov PolicyGoogle Scholar
  216. Turner R et al (1998) Green taxes, waste management and political economy. J Environ Manage 53:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. USAID (2014) Encouraging renewable energy development: a handbook for international energy regulatorsGoogle Scholar
  218. Van de Graaf T (2013) The politics and institutions of global energy governance. Palgrave/MamillanGoogle Scholar
  219. Van de Graaf T, van Asselt H (2017) Introduction to the special issue: energy subsidies at the intersection of climate, energy, and trade governance. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 17(3):313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Victor, Yueh (2010) The new energy order: managing insecurities in the twenty-first century. Foreig Aff:89Google Scholar
  221. Viñuales JE (2012) Foreign investment and the environment in international law. Cambridge University Press, p 1Google Scholar
  222. Von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  223. Wagner G, Weitzman ML (2016) Climate shock. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Wenger A et al (eds) (2009) Energy and the transformation of international relations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  225. Wise J (2006) Access to AIDS medicines stumbles on trade rules. Bull World Health Org 84:342. http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/84/5/news.pdf [https://perma.cc/QH9U-6CNW]Google Scholar
  226. Wold C, Wilson G, Foroshani S (2012) Leveraging climate change benefits through the world trade organization: are fossil fuel subsidies actionable? Georgetown J Int Law 43:635, 694Google Scholar
  227. Wood S, Abbott K, Black J, Eberlein B, Meidinger E (2015) The interactive dynamics of transnational business governance: a challenge for transnational legal theory. Transnatl Leg TheoryGoogle Scholar
  228. Wu M (2014) Why developing countries won’t negotiate: the case of the WTO environmental goods agreement. Trade Law Dev 6:93Google Scholar
  229. Yamusa SU, Ansari AH (2013) Renewable energy development in two selected African countries: an overview and assessment. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 4(2):151–156Google Scholar
  230. Yergin D (2006) Ensuring energy security. Foreign Aff 85(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Yergin D (2008) The prize: the epic quest for oil, money and power. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  232. Yergin D (2011) The quest: energy, security, and the remaking of the modern world. Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  233. Zarrilli S (2010) Development of the emerging biofuels market. In: Goldthau A, Witte JM (eds) Global energy governance: the new rules of the game. Brookings Instit Press, chapter 4Google Scholar
  234. Zeitlin J (2011) Pragmatic transnationalism: governance across borders in the global economy. Socio-Econ Rev 9(1):187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Zhang ZX (2013) Trade in environmental goods, with focus on climate-friendly goods and technologies. In: Van Calster G, Prevost D (eds) Research handbook on environment, health and the WTO, chapter 19. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 673–699Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations