Advertisement

Efficacy of High-Fidelity Simulation on Learning Outcomes: Immediate Results for a Postgraduate Intensive Care Nursing Course

  • Angelo DanteEmail author
  • Carmen La Cerra
  • Vittorio Masotta
  • Valeria Caponnetto
  • Elona Gaxhja
  • Cristina Petrucci
  • Loreto Lancia
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1008)

Abstract

High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) founded on critical care scenarios requires nursing students to perform clinical interventions to effectively face life-threatening conditions. Since little evidence is available on the effectiveness of HFS on knowledge, self-confidence, self-efficacy, performance, and satisfaction of postgraduate nursing students attending an intensive care course, a before-and-after study was conducted on 28 students to document any change of learning outcomes in a respiratory failure scenario. After the HFS session, a significant improvement for self-confidence was revealed. Beyond the statistical significance, the HFS demonstrated to be a valuable complement to traditional education for many students, determining an improvement of their knowledge and self-efficacy. High level in performance and satisfaction during and after HFS session were also documented, confirming HFS as a valid teaching method in the achievement of learning goals, especially when associated with the traditional work placement models, in nursing students attending a postgraduate academic course on intensive and emergency care.

Keywords

High fidelity simulation training Nursing students Postgraduate Intensive Care Nursing course Learning outcomes 

References

  1. 1.
    Waxman, K.: The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: guidelines for nurse educators. J. Nurs. Educ. 49(1), 29–35 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petrucci, C., La Cerra, C., Caponnetto, V., Franconi, I., Gaxhja, E., Rubbi, I., Lancia L.: Literature-based analysis of the potentials and the limitations of using simulation in nursing education. In: Vittorini, P., Gennari, R., Di Mascio, T., Rodríguez, S., De la Prieta, F., Ramos, C., Azambuja Silveira, R. (eds.) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning. AISC, pp. 57–64. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGaghie, W.C., Issenberg, S.B., Cohen, E.R., Barsuk, J.H., Wayne, D.B.: Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad. Med. 86(6), 706–711 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    La Cerra, C., Dante, A., Caponnetto, V., Franconi, I., Gaxhja, E., Petrucci, C., Lancia L.: High-fidelity patient simulation in critical care area: a methodological overview. In: Di Mascio, T., Vittorini, P., Gennari, R., De la Prieta, F., Rodríguez, S., Temperini, M., Azambuja Silveira, R., Popescu, E., Lancia, L. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 269–274. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, J., Park, J.H., Shin, S.: Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. Educ. 23(16), 152 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leigh, G.T.: High-fidelity patient simulation and nursing students’ self-efficacy: a review of the literature. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 5(1), 1–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petrucci, C., Alvaro, R., Cicolini, G., Cerone, M.P., Lancia, L.: Percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures in nursing students: an Italian observational study. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 41(4), 337–343 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dante, A., Natolini, M., Graceffa, G., Zanini, A., Palese, A.: The effects of mandatory preclinical education on exposure to injuries as reported by Italian nursing students: a 15-year case–control, multicentre study. J. Clin. Nurs. 23(5–6), 900–904 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newton, J.M., McKenna, L.: The transitional journey through the graduate year: a focus group study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 44(7), 1231–1237 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolf, Z.R., Hicks, R., Serembus, J.F.: Characteristics of medication errors made by students during the administration phase: a descriptive study. J. Prof. Nurs. 22(1), 39–51 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hunt, D.P.: The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. JIC 4(1), 100–113 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garside, J.R., Nhemachena, J.Z.: A concept analysis of competence and its transition in nursing. Nurse Educ. Today 33(5), 541–545 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robb, Y., Dietert, C.: Measurement of clinical performance of nurses: a literature review. Nurse Educ. Today 22(4), 293–300 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zulkosky, K.: Self-efficacy: a concept analysis. Nurs. Forum 44(2), 93–102 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perry, P.: Concept analysis: confidence/self-confidence. Nurs. Forum 46(4), 218–230 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dante, A., La Cerra, C., Caponnetto, V., Franconi, I., Gaxhja, E., Petrucci, C., Lancia L.: Efficacy of high-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education: research protocol of ‘S4NP’ randomized controlled trial. In: Di Mascio, T., Vittorini, P., Gennari, R., De la Prieta, F., Rodríguez, S., Temperini, M., Azambuja Silveira, R., Popescu, E., Lancia, L. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 261–268. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwarzer, R.: Measurement of Perceived Self-efficacy: Psychometric Scales for Cross-Cultural Research. Free University of Berlin, Institute for Psychology, Berlin (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jeffries, P.R., Rizzolo, M.A.: Designing and Implementing Models for the Innovative Use of Simulation to Teach Nursing Care of Ill Adults and Children: A National, Multi-Site, Multi-Method Study (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pub. L. No. 196: Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    INACSL Committee: INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM Simulation design. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 12, S5–S12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Menarini, M., Petrini, F., Bigi, E., Donato, P., Di Filippo, A.: Linee-guida per la gestione preospedaliera delle vie aeree. Società Italiana di Anestesia Rianimazione e Terapia Antalgica. http://www.siaarti.it/SiteAssets/Ricerca/Linee-guida-per-la-gestione-preospedaliera-delle-vie-aeree/linee_guida_file_32.pdf. Accessed 02 Oct 2019
  22. 22.
    Colt, H.G., Davoudi, M., Murgu, S., Rohani, N.Z.: Measuring learning gain during a one-day introductory bronchoscopy course. Surg. Endosc. 25(1), 207–216 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hake, R.R.: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. AJP 66(1), 64–74 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McGowan, M., Davis, G.: Individual gain and engagement with teaching goals. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter OISE, Toronto (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D’Addio, L.: La sanità italiana è donna. L’infermiere 2 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boling, B., Hardin-Pierce, M.: The effect of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge and confidence in critical care training: an integrative review. Nurse Educ. Pract. 16(1), 287–293 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kolb, D.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1984)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    La Cerra, C., Dante, A., Caponnetto, V., Franconi, I., Gaxhja, E., Petrucci, C., Alfes, C.M., Lancia, L.: Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 22, e025306 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baptista, R.C., Paiva, L.A., Goncalves, R.F., Oliveira, L.M., Pereira, M.F., Martins, J.C.: Satisfaction and gains perceived by nursing students with medium and high-fidelity simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ. Today 46, 127–132 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kang, K.A., Kim, S., Kim, S.J., Oh, J., Lee, M.: Comparison of knowledge, confidence in skill performance (CSP) and satisfaction in problem-based learning (PBL) and simulation with PBL educational modalities in caring for children with bronchiolitis. Nurse Educ. Today 35(2), 315–321 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelo Dante
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carmen La Cerra
    • 1
  • Vittorio Masotta
    • 1
  • Valeria Caponnetto
    • 1
  • Elona Gaxhja
    • 1
  • Cristina Petrucci
    • 1
  • Loreto Lancia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health, Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations