Systems Toxicology Approach to Unravel Early Indicators of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Rate in Rat Nasal Epithelium Induced by Formaldehyde Exposure

  • Florian MartinEmail author
  • Marja Talikka
  • Julia Hoeng
  • Manuel C. Peitsch
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1005)


Causal biological network models consisting of multiple biological pathways involved in a given biological process can serve to contextualize gene expression changes and unravel key mechanisms responsible for those changes. The transcriptomic data from the respiratory nasal epithelium (RNE) of rats exposed to formaldehyde have been investigated using such causal biological network models. The resulting association between the biological impact assessed by network perturbation and the squamous cell carcinoma rate in the RNE after two years has been further investigated to gain mechanistic insights. A detailed node-level investigation revealed that while similar network models were impacted across exposure doses, the directionality of the effect was opposite for the lowest doses compared to high doses. In particular, NF-κB was inferred to be upregulated in response to the two higher doses and downregulated in response to the lower doses in the context of the epithelial innate immune activation network model. This highlighted a dose threshold indicative of a long-term biphasic effect of formaldehyde exposure leading to carcinogenicity. The presented approach could be used to establish the mechanism of action or grouping of compounds based on impacted regions in the network models.


Gene expression Network biology Toxicology 


  1. 1.
    Council NR. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. National Academies Press, 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sturla, S.J., Boobis, A.R., FitzGerald, R.E., et al.: Systems toxicology: from basic research to risk assessment. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27, 314–329 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander-Dann, B., Pruteanu, L.L., Oerton, E., et al.: Developments in toxicogenomics: understanding and predicting compound-induced toxicity from gene expression data. Mol. Omics 14, 218–236 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emmert-Streib, F., Dehmer, M., Haibe-Kains, B.: Gene regulatory networks and their applications: understanding biological and medical problems in terms of networks. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2, 38 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szostak, J., Ansari, S., Madan, S., et al.: Construction of biological networks from unstructured information based on a semi-automated curation workflow. Database 2015, bav057 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin, F., Sewer, A., Talikka, M., Xiang, Y., Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M.C.: Quantification of biological network perturbations for mechanistic insight and diagnostics using two-layer causal models. BMC Bioinform. 15, 238 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talikka, M., Bukharov, N., Hayes, W.S., et al.: Novel approaches to develop community-built biological network models for potential drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 12, 849–857 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoeng, J., Talikka, M., Martin, F., et al.: Toxicopanomics: applications of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and lipidomics in predictive mechanistic toxicology. In: Hayes’ Principles and Methods of Toxicology, p. 322–359. CRC Press (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andersen, M.E., Clewell 3rd, H.J., Bermudez, E., et al.: Formaldehyde: integrating dosimetry, cytotoxicity, and genomics to understand dose-dependent transitions for an endogenous compound. Toxicol. Sci. 118, 716–731 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstein, R.S., Stayner, L.T., Elliott, L.J., Kimbrough, R., Falk, H., Blade, L.: Inhalation exposure to formaldehyde: an overview of its toxicology, epidemiology, monitoring, and control. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 45, 778–785 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kerns, W.D., Pavkov, K.L., Donofrio, D.J., Gralla, E.J., Swenberg, J.A.: Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in rats and mice after long-term inhalation exposure. Cancer Res. 43, 4382–4392 (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monticello, T.M., Swenberg, J.A., Gross, E.A., et al.: Correlation of regional and nonlinear formaldehyde-induced nasal cancer with proliferating populations of cells. Cancer Res. 56, 1012–1022 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boué, S., Talikka, M., Westra, J.W., et al.: Causal biological network database: a comprehensive platform of causal biological network models focused on the pulmonary and vascular systems. Database 2015, bav030 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoeng, J., Talikka, M., Martin, F., et al.: Case study: the role of mechanistic network models in systems toxicology. Drug Discov. Today 19, 183–192 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kogel, U., Titz, B., Schlage, W.K., et al.: Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 7: systems toxicological assessment of a mentholated version revealed reduced cellular and molecular exposure effects compared with mentholated and non-mentholated cigarette smoke. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81, S123–S138 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips, B., Veljkovic, E., Boué, S., et al.: An 8-month systems toxicology inhalation/cessation study in Apoe−/− mice to investigate cardiovascular and respiratory exposure effects of a candidate modified risk tobacco product, THS 2.2, compared with conventional cigarettes. Toxicol. Sci. 149, 411–432 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Talikka, M., Boue, S., Schlage, W.K.: Causal biological network database: a comprehensive platform of causal biological network models focused on the pulmonary and vascular systems. In: Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M.C. (eds.) Computational Systems Toxicology. MPT, pp. 65–93. Springer, New York (2015). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong, E.T., Kogel, U., Veljkovic, E., et al.: Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 4: 90-day OECD 413 rat inhalation study with systems toxicology endpoints demonstrates reduced exposure effects compared with cigarette smoke. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81, S59–S81 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zanetti, F., Sewer, A., Scotti, E., et al.: Assessment of the impact of aerosol from a potential modified risk tobacco product compared with cigarette smoke on human organotypic oral epithelial cultures under different exposure regimens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 115, 148–169 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dai, M., Wang, P., Boyd, A.D., et al.: Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data. Nucl. Acids Res. 33, e175 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCall, M.N., Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A.: Frozen robust multiarray analysis (fRMA). Biostatistics 11, 242–253 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A., Åstrand, M., Speed, T.P.: A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185–193 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomson, T.M., Sewer, A., Martin, F., et al.: Quantitative assessment of biological impact using transcriptomic data and mechanistic network models. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 272, 863–878 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park, J., Schlage, W., Frushour, B., Talikka, M., Toedter, G.: Construction of a computable network model of tissue repair and angiogenesis in the lung. J. Clin. Toxicol. S12, 002 (2013). Scholar
  25. 25.
    Frey, B.J., Dueck, D.: Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karin, M.: NF-κB as a critical link between inflammation and cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Persp. Biol. 1, a000141 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Martin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marja Talikka
    • 1
  • Julia Hoeng
    • 1
  • Manuel C. Peitsch
    • 1
  1. 1.PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A.NeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations