Advertisement

Soft Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Actuator Design and Fabrication: Towards Robust, Soft Robotic Systems

  • Jan FrasEmail author
  • Kaspar Althoefer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11649)

Abstract

Soft robotics is a rapidly evolving, young research area. So far there are no well-established design standards nor fabrication procedures for soft robots. A number of research groups are working on soft robotics solutions independently and we can observe a range of designs realized in different ways. These soft robots are based on various actuation principles, are driven with various actuation media, and offer various actuation properties. Still, most of them require lots of manual effort and high manual fabrication skills from the person manufacturing these kinds of robots. A significant share of the proposed designs suffers from some imperfections that could be improved by simple design changes. In this work, we propose a number of design and fabrication rules for improving the performance and fabrication complexity of soft fiber-reinforced pneumatic actuators. The proposed design approach focuses on a circular geometry for the pressure chambers and applying a dense, fiber-based reinforcement. Such an approach allows for a more linear actuator response and reduced wear of the actuators, when compared to previous approaches. The proposed manufacturing procedure introduces the application of the reinforcement before the fabrication of the actuator body, significantly reducing the required fabrication effort and providing more consistent and more reliable results.

Keywords

Soft robotics Soft pneumatic actuation Soft actuation Soft robotics manufacturing Compliant robotics 

References

  1. 1.
    Shapiro, Y., Wolf, A., Gabor, K.: Bi-bellows: pneumatic bending actuator. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 167(2), 484–494 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Althoefer, K: Neuro-fuzzy path planning for robotic manipulators (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Konstantinova, J., Shafti, A., Althoefer, K.: Soft and Stiffness-Controllable Robotics Solutions for Minimally Invasive Surgery: The STIFF-FLOP Approach. River Publishers, Gistrup (2018). https://www.riverpublishers.com/book_details.php?book_id=493
  4. 4.
    Arezzo, A., et al.: Total mesorectal excision using a soft and flexible robotic arm: a feasibility study in cadaver models. Surg. Endosc. 31, 264–273 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stilli, A., et al.: AirExGlove–a novel pneumatic exoskeleton glove for adaptive hand rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), pp. 579–584. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Althoefer, K.: Antagonistic actuation and stiffness control in soft inflatable robots. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3(6), 76 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stilli, A., Wurdemann, H.A., Althoefer, K.: A novel concept for safe, stiffness-controllable robot links. Soft Robot. 4(1), 16–22 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ilievski, F., Mazzeo, A.D., Shepherd, R.F., Chen, X., Whitesides, G.M.: Soft robotics for chemists. Angew. Chem. 123(8), 1930–1935 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deimel, R., Brock, O.: A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping. Int. J. Robot. Res. 35(1–3), 161–185 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fras, J., Althoefer, K.: Soft biomimetic prosthetic hand: design, manufacturing and preliminary examination. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmitt, F., Piccin, O., Barbé, L., Bayle, B.: Soft robots manufacturing: a review. Front. Robot. AI 5, 84 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walker, S., Yirmibeşoğlu, O.D., Daalkhaijav, U., Mengüç, Y.: Additive manufacturing of soft robots. In: Robotic Systems and Autonomous Platforms, pp. 335–359. Woodhead Publishing (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wallin, T.J., Pikul, J., Shepherd, R.F.: 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klute, G.K., Hannaford, B.: Fatigue characteristics of McKibben artificial muscle actuators. In: IROS (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fras, J., Noh, Y., Wurdemann, H., Althoefer, K.: Soft fluidic rotary actuator with improved actuation properties. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galloway, K.C., Polygerinos, P., Walsh, C.J., Wood, R.J.: Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators. In: 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Connolly, F., Polygerinos, P., Walsh, C.J., Bertoldi, K.: Mechanical programming of soft actuators by varying fiber angle. Soft Robot. 2(1), 26–32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bishop-Moser, J., Krishnan, G., Kim, C., Kota, S.: Design of soft robotic actuators using fluid-filled fiber-reinforced elastomeric enclosures in parallel combinations. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4264–4269. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Polygerinos, P., et al.: Modeling of soft fiber-reinforced bending actuators. IEEE Trans. Robot. 31(3), 778–789 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fras, J., Czarnowski, J., Macias, M., Glowka, J., Cianchetti, M., Menciassi, A.: New STIFF-FLOP module construction idea for improved actuation and sensing. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2901–2906. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fras, J., Noh, Y., Macias, M., Wurdemann, H., Althoefer, K.: Bio-inspired octopus robot based on novel soft fluidic actuator. In: Submitted to International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fras, J., Macias, M., Noh, Y., Althoefer, K.: Fluidical bending actuator designed for soft octopus robot tentacle. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), pp. 253–257. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Robotics @ Queen Mary (ARQ), Faculty of Science and EngineeringQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations