Advertisement

Light Intensity-Modulated Bending Sensor Fabrication and Performance Test for Shape Sensing

  • Faisal ALJaberEmail author
  • Kaspar AlthoeferEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11649)

Abstract

Notable advancements in shape sensing for flexible continuum robot arms can be observed. With a keen interest to develop surgical and diagnostic tools that can advance further and further into inaccessible spaces along tortuous pathways, such as the human body, a need for the precise determination of the robot’s pose arises. Whilst there have been techniques developed that use external sensors to observe the advancing robot from the outside to determine its location and orientation in space, there is an observable trend towards using integrated, internal sensors to measure these positional parameters. Especially in the medical world with its tough requirements on robot size, e.g., catheter-type robots, most pose-sensing approaches to date make use of a technique called Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG). FBG sensors make use of fibers that are grated, and the amount of bending can be determined with an appropriate optical interrogator. Although these fiber sensors have been successfully employed to measure the deformation and through advanced signal processing the pose of continuum catheters, they have a major drawback which is their exorbitant cost. To address this issue a different design and fabrication process is proposed to produce an affordable shape sensor that is highly flexible and can detect bending. The method of operation involves a segmented flexible robot arm with three waveguides in a 120-degrees configuration. The segments are made of silicone elastomer with channels that encapsulate light propagating internally, with a photodiode and light-emitting diode (LED) embedded in each individual channel. The prototype was developed and characterized for strain, and bending response detection.

Keywords

Shape sensing Optical fiber Intensity modulated shape sensor Soft robotics Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) PDMS 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank each of Eng. Ahmed Al-Kuwari, Mr. Sunith Padinjarayil, and Sara Abazid for their help in 3D-printing, setting up the electrical circuit of the photodiode, and the calibration experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Shi, C., Luo, X., Fukuda, T.: Shape sensing techniques for continuum robots in minimally invasive surgery: a survey. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. PP(99) (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roesthuis, R.J., Kemp, M., van den Dobbelsteen, J.J.: Three-dimensional needle shape reconstruction using an array of fiber Bragg grating sensors. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19(4), 1115–1126 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roesthuis, R.J., Janssen, S., Misra, S.: On using an array of fiber Bragg grating sensors for closed-loop control of flexible minimally invasive surgical instruments. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ryu, S.C., Dupont, P.E.: FBG-based shape sensing tubes for continuum robots. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abayazid, M., Kemp, M., Misra, S.: 3D flexible needle steering in soft-tissue phantoms using fiber Bragg grating sensors. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, S., Laschi, C., Trimmer, B.: Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends Biotechnol. 31(5), 287–294 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Majidi, C.: Soft robotics: a perspective–current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot. 1(1), 5–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park, Y.-L., Majidi, C., Kramer, R., Berard, P., Wood, R.J.: Hyperelastic pressure sensing with a liquid-embedded elastomer. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(12), 125029 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park, Y.-L., Chen, B., Wood, R.J.: Design and fabrication of soft artificial skin using embedded microchannels and liquid conductors. IEEE Sens. J. 12(8), 2711–2718 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, C.-Y., Liao, W.H., Tung, Y.-C.: Integrated ionic liquid-based electrofluidic circuits for pressure sensing within polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 11(207890), 1740–1746 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickey, M.D., Chiechi, R.C., Larsen, R.J., Weiss, E.A., Weitz, D.A., Whitesides, G.M.: Eutectic gallium-indium (EGaIn): a liquid metal alloy for the formation of stable structures in microchannels at room temperature. Adv. Func. Mater. 18, 1097–1104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, T., Sen, P., Kim, C.: Characterization of nontoxic liquid-metal alloy Galinstan for applications in microdevices. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 21, 443–450 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong, R.P., Posner, J., Santos, V.: Flexible microfluidic normal force sensor skin for tactile feedback. Sens. Actuators A 179, 62–69 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vogt, D.M., Park, Y.-L., Wood, R.J.: Design and characterization of a soft multi-axis force sensor using embedded microfluidic channels. IEEE Sens. J. 13(10), 4056–4064 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Majidi, C., Kramer, R., Wood, R.J.: A non-differential elastomer curvature sensor for softer-than-skin electronics. Smart Mater. Struct. 20, 105017 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Visser, A., Bridges, N., Rogers, R.: Ionic Liquids: Science and Applications, vol. 1117. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chossat, J.-B., Park, Y.-L., Wood, R.J., Duchaine, V.: A soft strain sensor based on ionic and metal liquids. IEEE Sens. J. 13(9), 3405–3414 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chossat, J.-B., Shin, H.-S., Park, Y.-L., Duchaine, V.: Design and manufacturing of soft tactile skin using an embedded ionic liquid and tomographic imaging. J. Mech. Robot. (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, K., Chen, I.-M., Yeo, S.H., Lim, C.K.: Development of finger-motion capturing device based on optical linear encoder. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(1), 69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kampmann, P., Kirchner, F.: Integration of fiber-optic sensor arrays into a multi-modal tactile sensor processing system for robotic end-effectors. Sensors 14(4), 6854–6876 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grillet, A., et al.: Optical fiber sensors embedded into medical textiles for healthcare monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 8(7), 1215–1222 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kopetz, S., Cai, D., Rabe, E., Neyer, A.: PDMS-based optical waveguide layer for integration in electrical–optical circuit boards. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 61(3), 163–167 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chang-Yen, D., Eich, R., Gale, B.: A monolithic PDMS waveguide system fabricated using soft-lithography techniques. J. Lightwave Technol. 23(6), 2088–2093 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kee, J.S., Poenar, D.P., Neuzil, P., Yobas, L.: Monolithic integration of poly(dimethylsiloxane) waveguides and microfluidics for on-chip absorbance measurements. Sens. Actuators B 134(2), 532–538 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    To, C., Hellebrekers, T.L., Park, Y.-L.: Highly stretchable optical sensors for pressure, strain, and curvature measurement. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fidanboylu, K.: Fiber optic sensors and their applications (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Méndez, A.: Overview of fiber optic sensors for NDT applications. In: IV NDT Panamerican Conference, pp. 1–11 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jones, D., Introduction to Fiber Optics. Naval Education and Training Professional Development and Technology Center (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jenny, R.: Fundemantals of Fiber Optics: An Introduction for Beginners. Volpi Manufacturing USA Co., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tracey, P.M.: Intrinsic fiber-optic sensors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 27, 1 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Polygerinos, P., Ataollahi, A., Schaeffter, T., Razavi, R., Seneviratne, L.D., Althoefer, K.: MRI-compatible intensity-modulated force sensor for cardiac catheterization procedures. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58(3), 721–726 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Polygerinos, P., Seneviratne, L.D., Althoefer, K.: Modeling of light intensity-modulated fiber-optic displacement sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60(4), 1408–1415 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Puangmali, P., Althoefer, K., Seneviratne, L.D.: Mathematical modeling of intensity-modulated bent-tip optical fiber displacement sensors. IEEE Trans. Intrum. Meas. 59(2), 283–291 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fraden, J.: Handbook of Modern Sensors, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuo, C.H., Dai, J.S.: Robotics for minimally invasive surgery: a historical review. In: Yan, H.S., Ceccarelli, M. (eds.) International Symposium on History of Machines and Mechanisms, pp. 337–354. Springer, Dordrecht (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9485-9_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dogangil, G., Davies, B.L., Rodriguez y Baena, F.: A review of medical robotics for minimally invasive soft tissue surgery. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H: J. Eng. Med. 224(5), 653–679 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Park, Y.L., Elayaperumal, S., Daniel, B., Ryu, S.C., Shin, M., Savall, J., et al.: Real-time estimation of 3-D needle shape and deflection for MRI-guided interventions. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 15, 906–915 (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Henken, K., Van Gerwen, D., Dankelman, J., Van Den Dobbelsteen, J.: Accuracy of needle position measurements using fiber Bragg gratings. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol.: MITAT: Off. J. Soc. Minim. Invasive Ther. 21, 408–414 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Searle, T.C., Althoefer, K., Seneviratne, L., Liu, H.: An optical curvature sensor for flexible manipulators. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 6–10 May 2013, pp. 4415–4420 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations