Skip to main content

How to Revitalise a Historic District: A Stakeholders-Oriented Assessment Framework of Adaptive Reuse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Values and Functions for Future Cities

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

This research proposes an application of a MultiCriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in the adaptive reuse framework, which is able to structure the complex decision process required for the effective reuse of an historic district. Nowadays, many cities are facing an economic, financial, social and urban decline. This is particularly true when thinking about historic districts, which are usually characterized by high unique cultural values but, at the same time, show difficult characteristics in terms of comfort and security. Accordingly, the planning rules to be applied to the historic districts need to be re-written overcoming the traditional logics. The proposed adaptive reuse framework deals with the application of the Macbeth method. To properly test, develop and illustrate the framework we conducted an experimental validation through a case study: the urban regeneration of an historical district in Biella (Italy) starting from the adaptive reuse of an historic building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abastante F (2016) Multicriteria decision methodologies supporting decision processes: empirical examples. Geam-Geoingegneria Ambientale E Mineraria-Geam-Geoengineering Environment Mining 149:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Lami IM (2012) Quality function deployment (QFD) and analytic network process (ANP): an application to analyse a cohousing intervention. J Appl Oper Res 4(1):14–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Lami IM (2012) A complex Analytic Network Process (ANP) network for analyzing Corridor24 alternative development strategies, Communications, Computing and Control Applications (CCCA), 2012 2nd International Conference on; Marseille; France; 6/8 December 2012; Code 95662 pp. 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Lami IM (2013) An analytical model to evaluate a large scale urban design competition. GEAM, Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria 139(2):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Lami IM (2014) Decision making for urban solid waste treatment in the context of territorial conflict: can the Analytic Network Process help? Land Use Policy 41:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Bottero M, Greco S, Lami IM (2012) A Dominance-based rough set approach model for selecting the location for a municipal solid waste plant. Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria 3(137):43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Lami IM, Lombardi P (2017) An integrated participative spatial decision support system for smart energy urban scenarios: a financial and economic approach. Buildings 7(4):103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Corrente S, Greco S, Ishizaka A, Lami IM (2018) Choice architecture for architecture choices: evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral. Land Use Policy 78:748–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abastante F, Corrente S, Greco S, Ishizaka A, Lami IM (2019) A new parsimonious AHP methodology: assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects. Expert Syst Appl 127(2019):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agenzia Territorio Locale Biella, Available online at: www.atl.biella.it. Accessed on 13 Sept 2018

  • Bana e Costa CA, Vansnick JC (1997) The MACBETH approach: basic ideas. In: Proceedings of the international conference on methods and applications of multicriteria decision making, pp 86–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bana e Costa CA, Correa EC, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC (2002) Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: a socio-technical approach. Omega 30(3):227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC (2010) Macbeth: measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique. In: Cochran JJ (ed) Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. Wiley Online Library, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baratta AFL, Fanucci F, Gabriele S, Metta A, Montuori L, Palmieri V (2014) Cohousing. Programmi per la riqualificazione del patrimonio esistente, Università degli Studi Roma tre, Dipartimento di Architettura, Edizioni ETS, Pisa

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiodelli F, Baglione V (2014) Living together privately: for a cautious reading of cohousing. Urban Res Pract 7(1):20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado MR, Gutiérrez Fernández M (2013) Methodology to select the best business game in higher education. Am J Ind Bus Manag 3(7):589–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewiyana E, Ibrahim N, Hidayah HN (2016) The green aspects of adaptive reuse of hotel Penaga. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 222:631–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J (2006) Building adaptation, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Douhib D (2014) An extension of MACBETH method for fuzzy environment to analyse alternatives in reverse logistics for automobile tire wastes. Omega 42(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer R, Forman E (1992) Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Support Syst 8(2):99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson K, Matthews J, Love PED (2016) Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environ Project Asset Manag 6(1):44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elefante C (2007) The greenest building is… one that is already built. Forum J. 21(4):26. National Trust for Historic Preservation

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasolo B, Bana e Costa CA (2014) Tailoring value elicitation to decision makers’ numeracy and fluency: expressing value judgments in numbers or words. Omega 44:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frenette CD, Beauregard R, Abi-Zeid I, Derome D, Salenikovich A (2009) Multicriteria decision analysis applied to the design of light-frame wood wall assem-blies. J Build Perform Simul 3(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraedts RP, van der Voordt T, Remøy H (2017) Conversion potential assessment tools. In: Remøy H, Wilkinson S (eds) Building resilience in urban settlements through sustainable change of use. Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Günçea K, Mısırlısoya D (2015) Questioning the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage and its interventions in the context of sustainability. Sociology 5(9):718–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Lab (2018) Available online at: http://www.housinglab.it/hlab/. Accessed on 13 Sept 2018

  • ISTAT Annual Report (2016) 299. ISBN: 978-88-458-1901-8

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT Annual Report (2017) 266. ISBN: 978-88-458-1927-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lami IM (2019) The context of urban renewals as a “super-wicked” problem. Smart Innov Syst Technol 100:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lami IM, Abastante F (2017) Social Housing evaluation procedures: literature review and steps forward. Geam-Geoingegneria Ambientale E Mineraria-Geam-Geoengineering Environment and Mining 150:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaert M (2010) Cohousing’s relevance to degrowth theories. J Clean Prod 18:576–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques M, Neves-Silva R (2015) Decision support for energy savings and emissions trading in industry. J Clean Prod 88:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute Report (2019) Available at www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/urbanization/urban-world-meeting-the-demographic-challenge-in-cities. Accessed on Jan 2019

  • M-Macbeth (2018) Available online at: www.m-macbeth.com. Accessed on June 2018

  • Németh J, Langhorst J (2013) Rethinking urban transformation: temporary uses for vacant land. Cities 40:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robiglio M (2016) The adaptive reuse toolkit. how cities can turn their industrial legacy into infrastructure for innovation and growth. Urban and regional Policy Paper, p 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavella E, Lami IM (2018) Negotiation perspectives and values through soft OR in the context of urban renewal. J Oper Res Soc 1–26 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian, Available at www.theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2016/nov/02/global-population-decline-cities-mapped. Accessed on Jan 2019

  • Young EHK, Chan EHW (2012) Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat Int 36(3):352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Abastante .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abastante, F., Lami, I.M., Mecca, B. (2020). How to Revitalise a Historic District: A Stakeholders-Oriented Assessment Framework of Adaptive Reuse. In: Mondini, G., Oppio, A., Stanghellini, S., Bottero, M., Abastante, F. (eds) Values and Functions for Future Cities. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23786-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23786-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23784-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23786-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics