Skip to main content

Fuzzy Prioritization of Factors Affecting Employer Branding for Employees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making (INFUS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1029))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study focuses on prioritizing the criteria which affect the employer branding. The literature review and assessment of the experts reveal certain factors pertaining to social, educational and professional aspects, as well as the family of the employee. These and other similar factors have an influence on the perception of employee about the employer branding and it is of great importance for the enterprises intending to keep qualified manpower to have a knowledge as to which one is more important for the enterprises and on the information intended for ranking the factors. Based on this point, the scope of this study addresses the issue of prioritizing the criteria just mentioned. In this paper, a solution approach based on Rough sets and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed for prioritizing these factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vercic, A.T., Coric, D.S.: The relationship between reputation, employer branding and corporate social responsibility. Public Relat. Rev. 44(4), 444–452 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonsen, K., Point, S., Kelan, E.K., Grieble, A.: Diversity and inclusion branding: a five-country comparison of corporate websites. Int. J. Hum. Res. Manag. (2019, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maurya, K.K., Agarwal, M.: Organisational talent management and perceived employer branding. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 26(2), 312–330 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., Zhu, B.: A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effect analysis in uncertain environments. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 30, 473–486 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stojic, G., Stevic, Z., Antucheviciene, J., Pamucar, D., Vasilijevic, M.: A novel Rough WASPAS approach for supplier selection in a company manufacturing PVC carpentry products. İnformation 9(121), 1–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhai, L., Khoo, L., Zhong, Z.: Integrating rough numbers with interval arithmetic: a novel approach to QFD analysis. Hong Kong Inst. Eng. Trans. 14(4), 74–81 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai, L., Khoo, L., Zhong, Z.: A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development. Adv. Eng. Inform. 23, 222–228 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 9–26 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Şenol, M.B., Dağdeviren, M., Kurt, M., Çilingir, C.: Evaluation of cockpit design by using quantitative and qualitative tools. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 847–851 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dağdeviren, M.: Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J. Intell. Manuf. 19, 397–406 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., Kılınç, N.: Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 8143–8151 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T.: Analytic hierarchy process and use of 0–1 goal programming methods in selecting supplier firm. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 16, 41–52 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D.: Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Comp. Ind. 5, 13–29 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D.: Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. Int. J. Intel. Syst. 19, 443–461 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiaohua, W., Zhenmin, F.: Sustainable development of rural energy and its appraising system in Chine. Renew. Sustain. Energy. 6, 395–404 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yedla, S., Shresta, R.M.: Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi. Transp. Res. 37, 717–729 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Çolak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Çolak, A., Adem, A., Dağdeviren, M. (2020). Fuzzy Prioritization of Factors Affecting Employer Branding for Employees. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A., Sari, I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_102

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics