Abstract
Rasmussen develops a story theodicy, which serves as a tool for investigating the problems of evil. To illustrate the tool, Rasmussen describes scenes of what he calls “the Great Story.” In the Great Story, all events flow along lines of purpose and goodness. In one scene, Rasmussen points to the value of including kingly creatures, who add suspense, and who have some freedom from the foundational character. Here, Rasmussen seeks to show how this scene fits with Leon’s analysis of the free will defense. Rasmussen then turns to Leon’s cumulative case from evil, which brings to light some of the most perplexing of the events. Rasmussen suggests why even such events could actually make the most sense in light of a great, unfolding story.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I say more about this root property and its implications in Rasmussen (2019).
- 2.
See Prestopnik (2016).
- 3.
But note: if Leon’s principle of material causation is true, then not even God could create beings from nothing.
- 4.
I develop these reasons in How Reason Can Lead to God (forthcoming).
- 5.
For more on reasons for randomness, see Rasmussen and Wessling (2015).
- 6.
Evidence indicates that variable (unpredictable) rewards are more interesting than determined rewards. See, for example, Brunner et al. (1994).
- 7.
- 8.
Rasmussen (2013).
- 9.
For more on the value of indeterminism for God, see Rasmussen and Wessling (2015).
- 10.
I will assume for sake of argument that there is a real risk. But note that if God could use middle knowledge to ensure that everyone freely does right all the time, per Leon’s suggestion (and my argument in Rasmussen 2004), then it looks like there’s no risk. In that case, God has all the more reason to create kingly creatures (or less reason not to), since God takes no risk in doing so. (I will discuss the implications of this middle knowledge account for the free will defense in the main text below.)
- 11.
For more on this connection-building theodicy, see Collins (2011).
- 12.
Another idea is that God has middle knowledge but, for the sake of risk and adventure, God is able to bracket that knowledge in the creation of the world.
- 13.
Besides all these points, even if God could make an evil-free world with moral freedom, it doesn’t follow that such a world would be better. An evil-free world would be missing all the valuable experiences I mentioned in my discussion of Upside. If anything, one may expect the greatest type of story to include moral dramas that unfold into incomparably greater goods.
- 14.
For a recent assessment of the prophetic data relevant to this most famous character in human history, see Scott (2018).
- 15.
Contrary to popular impression, studies show that despite diminishment along physical lines, people actually tend to increase in happiness as they age, see Rauch (2018).
- 16.
For more on the nature of humor, see Morreall (2016). (Ironically, as I type this note, my wife is in the other room laughing because my kids are crying so intensely in her ear.)
- 17.
My own evolution simulation never generated anything so sophisticated, and in fact, sophistication of the organisms and their interactions decreased over time.
- 18.
See Easterbrook’s, It’s Better Than It Looks: Reasons for Optimism in an Age of Fear (2018).
- 19.
See this meta-analysis by Masters and Spielmans (2007).
- 20.
Schwartz and Begley (2002).
References
Brunner, D., J. Gibbon, and S. Fairhurst. (1994). “Choice Between Fixed and Variable Delays with Different Reward Amounts.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 20 (4): 331–346.
Collins, Robin. 2011. “Divine Action and Evolution.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Thomas P. Flint and Michael C. Rea, 241–261. New York: Oxford University.
Dougherty, Trent, and Alexander R. Pruss. (2014). “Evil and the Problem of Anomaly.” Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 5: 49–87.
Easterbrook, Gregg. 2018. It’s Better Than It Looks: Reasons for Optimism in an Age of Fear. New York: Hachette Book Group.
Masters, K. M., and G. Spielmans. 2007. “Prayer and Health: Review, Meta-Analysis, and Research Agenda.” Journal of Behavioral Medicine 30: 329–338.
Morreall, John. 2016. “The Philosophy of Humor.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/humor.
Morriston, Wesley. 2000. “What Is so Good About Moral Freedom.” Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2000): 344–358.
Oppy, Graham. 2014. Describing Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prestopnik, N. 2016. “Games, Stories and Language: Motivating Second Language Acquisition with Play.” International Journal of Designs for Learning 7 (3).
Rasmussen, Joshua. 2004. “On Creating Worlds Without Evil: Given Divine Counterfactual Knowledge.” Religious Studies 40 (4):457–470.
Rasmussen, Joshua. 2013. “On the Value of the Freedom to Do Evil.” Faith and Philosophy 30: 418–428.
Rasmussen, Joshua. 2019. How Reason Can Lead to God. Westmont, IL: Intervarsity Press.
Rauch, Jonathan. 2018. The Happiness Curve: Why Life Gets Better After 50. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Schwartz, J. M., and S. Begley. 2002. The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force. New York: HarperCollins.
Scott, Douglas. 2018. Is Jesus of Nazareth the Predicted Messiah? A Historical-Evidential Approach to Specific Old Testament Messianic Prophecies and Their New Testament Fulfillments. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.
Wessling, Jordan, and Joshua Rasmussen. 2015. “Reasons for Randomness: A Solution to the Axiological Problem for Theists.” Theology and Science 13 (3): 288–304.
Wessling, Jordan, and Joshua Rasmussen. 2017. “A Randomness‐based Theodicy for Evolutionary Evils.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 52 (4): 984–1004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rasmussen, J. (2019). The Great Story Theodicy. In: Is God the Best Explanation of Things?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23752-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23752-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23751-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23752-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)