Abstract
The doctoral journey can be highly individualised, complex and ambiguous. I, in this chapter, reflect retrospectively on my personal doctoral journey and involvement in an informal community of practice (CoP). I examine the process in the light of existing research into CoPs, participation and other learning frameworks. I observe that, while the administrative guidelines were important measures of my progress against the institutional requirements, it was my evolving experience in the CoP from being the ‘newbie’ to becoming the one supporting others by sharing my knowledge and experiences that increased my confidence, and served as an indicator of my growth as a researcher. The content lends credence to the value of embracing CoPs in doctoral programmes, provides a useful frame to view the doctoral journey and sheds light on an individual’s evolution while she or he is a part of a CoP.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.
Borzillo, S., Aznar, S., & Schmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal,29(1), 25–42.
Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education,30(5), 501–516.
Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.
Clance, P., & Imes, S. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241.
Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science,31(6), 527–540.
Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2005). The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management,18(2), 145–166.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fontaine, M. (2001). Keeping communities of practice afloat: Understanding and fostering roles in communities. Knowledge Management Review,4(4), 16–21.
Freeman, M. (2004). Data are everywhere: Narrative criticism in the literature of experience. In C. Daiute & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. 63–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics,57(2), 177–211.
Grover, V. (2007). Successfully navigating the stages of doctoral study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,2(1), 9–21.
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies,43(3), 641–653.
Kietzmann, J., Plangger, K., Eaton, B., Heilgenberg, K., Pitt, L., & Berthon, P. (2013). Mobility at work: A typology of mobile communities of practice and contextual ambidexterity. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,22(4), 282–297.
Koliba, C., & Gajda, R. (2009). ‘Communities of practice’ as an analytical construct: Implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration,32(2), 97–135.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. In E. W. J. Lave (Ed.), Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leshem, S. (2007). Thinking about conceptual frameworks in a research community of practice: A case of a doctoral programme. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,44(3), 287–299.
Lévesque, M., Minniti, M., & Shepherd, D. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ decisions on timing of entry: Learning from participation and from the experiences of others. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,33(2), 547–570.
McDermott, R. (1999). Learning across teams. Knowledge Management Review,2(8), 3.
McDermott, R. (2004). How to avoid a mid-life crisis in your CoPs: Uncovering six keys to sustaining communities. Knowledge Management Review,4(2), 10–13.
Millen, D. R., Fontaine, M. A., & Muller, M. J. (2002). Understanding the benefit and costs of communities of practice. Communications of the ACM,45(3), 69–73.
Morton, M., & Thornley, G. (2001). Experiences of doctoral students in mathematics in New Zealand. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,26(2), 113–126.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies,43(3), 623–639.
Shacham, M., & Od-Cohen, Y. (2009). Rethinking doctoral learning incorporating communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,46(3), 279–292.
University of Queensland. (2015). Completing each milestone. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://www.uq.edu.au/grad-school/completing-each-milestone.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). ‘It is what one does’: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,9(2), 155–173.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2007). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved May 22, 2015, from https://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Retrieved March 31, 2019, from https://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/cultivating-communities-of-practice-a-guide-to-managing-knowledge-seven-principles-for-cultivating-communities-of-practice.
Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review,78(1), 139–146.
Wilding, C., Curtin, M., & Whiteford, G. (2012). Enhancing occupational therapists’ confidence and professional development through a community of practice scholars. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal,59(4), 312–318.
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,44(3), 301–320.
Young, S., & Mitchell, J. (2003). Putting more practice into communities of practice. Paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) Conference, Australian Technology Park, Sydney.
Zimitat, C. (2007). Capturing community of practice knowledge for student learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,44(3), 321–330.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malhotra, A. (2019). Looking for, Learning from and Finally Becoming the Voice of Experience: A Communities of Practice Perspective on the Doctoral Journey. In: Machin, T.M., Clarà, M., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Traversing the Doctorate. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23730-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23731-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)