Advertisement

Avebury Portal – A Location-Based Augmented Reality Treasure Hunt for Archaeological Sites

  • Farbod ShakouriEmail author
  • Feng Tian
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11462)

Abstract

Many archaeological sites are less popular by visits amongst the younger group and overall less popular than majority of other heritage sites. They are often not enhanced by supporting medium like in museums or historic buildings. Many augmented reality (AR) systems have been developed for archaeological sites and proved to benefit user engagement. However, most result in the superimposition of virtual reconstructions of the site and very little interaction. In this paper, we demonstrate the development of a location-based treasure hunt AR app, Avebury Portal, for the heritage site; Avebury in England. Avebury Portal uses puzzles with the environment to give clues, and a narrative that responds to the user’s location. We developed Avebury Portal with Unity Engine and Vuforia to demonstrate the effectiveness of using AR to enhance visitors’ experiences on learning.

Keywords

Location-based AR Archaeological heritage site Interactive learning Multimodal interface Locative narrative 

References

  1. 1.
    UK Department for Digital, Culture Media & Sport: Taking Part Focus on: Heritage. National Statistics, London (2017). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/655949/Taking_Part_Focus_on_Heritage.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    Bay, H., Fasel, B., Van Gool, L.: Interactive museum guide: fast and robust recognition of museum object. Computer Vision Laboratory, Zurich. https://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/publications/papers/proceedings/eth_biwi_00394.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2017
  3. 3.
    Niantic: Nintendo (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., Huang, R.: A review of using augmented reality in education from 2011 to 2016. Smart Learning Institute, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China (2017). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/deaa/5b1ad5a3ecec6a83783e7ac371b2a3970ed3.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2017
  5. 5.
    Narciso, D., Padua, L., Adao, T., Peres, E., Magalhaes, L.: MixAR mobile prototype: visualizing virtually reconstructed ancient structures in situ. In: Proceedings of Conference on Enterprise Information Systems/International Conference on Project Management/Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist, 7–9 October 2015Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    English Heritage: History of Avebury Henge and Stone Circles (2002). http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/avebury/history/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017
  7. 7.
    Papagiannakis, G., Magnenat-Thalmann, N.: Virtual worlds and augmented reality in cultural heritage applications. In: Baltsavias et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Recording, Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage, January 2006, Abington, pp. 419–430. Taylor and Francis Group, Abington (2006). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232613064_Virtual_Worlds_and_Augmented_Reality_in_Cultural_Heritage_Applications. Accessed 17 Jan 2018
  8. 8.
    Vlahakis, V., et al.: Archeoguide: an augmented reality guide for archaeological sites. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 22(5), 52–60 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nieuwdorp, E.: The pervasive interface: tracing the magic circle. In: Proceedings of Digital Games Research Conference 2005, Changing Views: Worlds in Play, 16–20 June 2005, Vancouver, Canada (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experiences. Northeastern University Press, Boston (1974)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mäyrä, F., Lankoski, P.: Player in hybrid reality, alternative approaches in game design. In: de Souza e Silva, A. (ed.) Digital Cityscapes: Merging Digital and Urban Playspaces, 1st edn. pp. 129–146. Peter Lang Publishing, Pieterlen (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Francis, E.: Avebury. Wooden Gift Books (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gillings, M., Barker, D., Pollard, J., Strutt, K., Taylor, J.: Squaring the circle? Geophysical survey across part of the southern inner circle of the Avebury (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Millard, D.E., Hargood, C., Jewell, M.O., Weal, M.J.: Canyons, deltas and plains: Towards a unified sculptural model of location-based hypertext. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hargood, C., Hunt, V., Weal, M., Millard, D.E.: Patterns of sculptural hypertext in location based narratives. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurschl, W., Gottesheim, W., Mitsch, S., Prokop, R., Schönböck, J.: Proposing Usability Patterns for Mobile Multimodal Applications, Hagenberg, Austria (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turk, M.: Pattern Recognition Letters. Multimodal interaction: a review (2013, in press). http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~mturk/Papers/TurkPRL2013.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2017
  18. 18.
    Hsieh, M.C., Lin, H.C.: A conceptual study for augmented reality e-learning system based on usability evaluation. In: Communications in Information Science and Management Engineering (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyBournemouth UniversityBournemouthUK

Personalised recommendations