Skip to main content

Business Key Performance Indicators—KPIs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1049 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 245))

Abstract

Industry requires CPA measures from the beginning. Scientific results describe the loop quality in some, often artificial domains. On the other hand, industry requires simple and straightforward numbers, that are monetary or can be easily translated into currency measures. It is caused by the fact that any decision upon process improvement is taken using financial incentives with the Return Of Investment as the main measure. This chapter describes business approach to the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). They are often custom and specific, but they describe the control quality in simple verbal form. As the drawings are the most popular way for data exchange by engineers, the visualization aspect plays an important role in the industrial approach.

The calamity of the information age is that the toxicity of data increases much faster than its benefits.

– Nassim Nicholas Taleb

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhutta, K.S., Huq, F.: Benchmarking best practices: an integrated approach. Benchmarking: Int. J. 6(3), 254–268 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cross, R., Iqbal, A.: The Rank Xerox experience: benchmarking ten years on. In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Benchmarking—Theory and Practice, pp. 3–10 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Domański, P.D., Golonka, S., Jankowski, R., Kalbarczyk, P., Moszowski, B.: Control rehabilitation impact on production efficiency of ammonia synthesis installation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(39), 10,366–10,376 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dziuba, K., Góra, R., Domański, P.D., Ławryńczuk, M.: Multicriteria control quality assessment for ammonia production process (in Polish). In: Zalewska, A. (Ed.) 1st Scientific and Technical Conference Innovations in the Chemical Industry, pp. 80–90. Warszawa, Poland (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feigenbaum, A.V.: Quality control: principles, practice and administration: an industrial management tool for improving product quality and design and for reducing operating costs and losses. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabor, J., Pakulski, D., Domański, P.D., Świrski, K.: Closed loop NOx control and optimization using neural networks. In: IFAC Symposium on Power Plants and Power Systems Control, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 188–196 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jelali, M., Thormann, M., Wolff, A., Müller, T., Loredo, L.R., Sanfilippo, F., Zangari, G., Foerster, P.: Enhancement of product quality and production system reliability by continuous performance assessment of automation systems (AUTOCHECK). Technical Report Final report to Contract No RFS-CR03045, EUR 23205, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kinney, T.: erformance monitor raises service factor of mpc. In: Proceedings of the ISA, Houston, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marlin, T.E., Perkins, J.D., Barton, G.W., Brisk, M.L.: Benefits from process control: results of a joint industry-university study. J. Process Control 1(2), 68–83 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, W., Shook, D.: Finding the needle in the haystack—an innovative means of visualizing control performance problems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ordys, A., Uduehi, D., Johnson, M.A.: Process Control Performance Assessment—From Theory to Implementation. Springer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smuts, J.F., Hussey, A.: Requirements for successfully implementing and sustaining advanced control applications. In: Proceedings of the 54th ISA POWID Symposium, pp. 89–105 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, P., Guo, L., Duan, Y., Zhou, W., He, G.: Control loop performance monitoring based on weighted permutation entropy and control charts. Can. J. Chem. Eng. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xia, C., Howell, J.: Loop status monitoring and fault localisation. J. Process Control 13(7), 679–691 (2003), selected Papers from the sixth IFAC Symposium on Bridging Engineering with Science - DYCOPS - 6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmerman, T.: Metrics and KPI for robotic cybersecurity performance analysis. Technical Report NISTIR 8177, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł D. Domański .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Domański, P.D. (2020). Business Key Performance Indicators—KPIs. In: Control Performance Assessment: Theoretical Analyses and Industrial Practice. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23593-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics