Skip to main content

Masters Program Flexible Endoscopy Pathway: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrotomy (PEG)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 685 Accesses

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (PEG) tube placement is a durable, minimally invasive approach to obtaining enteral access. Primary indications include nutrition supplementation and gastric decompression in a variety of patient presentations. A number of contraindications exist, and practitioners should be aware of alternative approaches. Informed consent can be complex in PEG tube candidates, and a thorough discussion of risks, benefits, and expectations should be held. Preparation is essential to efficiency and avoiding complications. The “pull” method is the most common technique but variations exist. Early and late complications exist, and physicians should have knowledge of their workup and treatment. There are some unique patient populations that require a modified approach to evaluation and technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

NG:

Nasogastric

PEG:

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy

References

  1. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981;27(1):9–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilhelm SM, Ortega KA, Stellato TA. Guidelines for identification and management of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy tube placement. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):396–9; discussion 9–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7739–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D’Silva J, James G, Bolton RP, Bardhan KD. Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(6):1472–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lipp A, Lusardi G. A systematic review of prophylactic antimicrobials in PEG placement. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(7):938–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton CA, McMillian WD, Osler T, Charash WE, Igneri PA, Brenny NC, et al. Anticoagulation management around percutaneous bedside procedures: is adjustment required? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(4):815–20; quiz 1124–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh D, Laya AS, Vaidya OU, Ahmed SA, Bonham AJ, Clarkston WK. Risk of bleeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (PEG). Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(4):973–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bechtold ML, Matteson ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Jiang PP, Roy PK. Early versus delayed feeding after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(11):2919–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee C, Im JP, Kim JW, Kim SE, Ryu DY, Cha JM, et al. Risk factors for complications and mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy: a multicenter, retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3806–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campoli PM, de Paula AA, Alves LG, Turchi MD. Effect of the introducer technique compared with the pull technique on the peristomal infection rate in PEG: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(5):988–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, Seamon MJ, Lukaszczyk JJ, Martin ND, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16(4):407–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bender JS. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy placement in the morbidly obese. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38(1):97–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bochicchio GV, Guzzo JL, Scalea TM. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy in the super morbidly obese patient. JSLS. 2006;10(4):409–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramona Ilie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davila, D., Ilie, R., Lin, E. (2020). Masters Program Flexible Endoscopy Pathway: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrotomy (PEG). In: Nau, P., Pauli, E., Sandler, B., Trus, T. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Flexible Endoscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23590-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23590-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23589-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23590-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics