Investigating the Relationship Between Connection, Agency and Autonomy for Controlling a Robot Arm for Remote Social Physical Interaction
- 1.2k Downloads
Current telecommunication systems such as Skype cannot allow remote users to interact physically. Thus, we propose installing a robot arm and teleoperating it can realize social physical interaction. Some autonomy may be necessary to realize easy teleoperation because teleoperation requires mental workload. However, too much autonomy can decrease sense of agency, which may cause lack of connection because remote users do not feel they caused actions. Thus, in this study, we investigate the relationship between autonomy level and sense of connection of a remote person with local area and people. We focus on pushing tasks because pushing is one of the major functions in hand and arm use. Sense of agency can be categorized into the Feeling of agency (FOA) which is not conceptual and the Judgement of agency (JOA) which is conceptual. Therefore, we conducted user studies to investigate whether FOA associated with control of trajectories and joint angles affects the sense of connection. The results suggested that higher autonomy could decrease telepresence, and remote users preferred controlling joint angles for fun, but they did not need FOA for performance.
KeywordsRemote social physical interaction Teleoperation Sense of agency
This research was supported by FXPAL. We would also like to thank Reach and Teach.
- 1.Ameri Research Inc.: Web conferencing market outlook to 2024: Key type categories (on-premise, hosted), organization size (SMEs, large enterprises), application (BFSI, retail, healthcare, education, government), regional segmentation, competitive dynamics, M&A insights, pricing analysis (IPP, OPP, RAP) and segment forecast (2017)Google Scholar
- 2.Kawasaki, H., Iizuka, H., Okamoto, S., Ando, H., Maeda, T.: Collaboration and skill transmission by first-person perspective view sharing system. In: IEEE Proceedings on International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Viareggio, pp. 125–131 (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Lee, G., Teo, T., Kim, S., Billinghurst, M.: Sharedsphere: MR collaboration through shared live panorama. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia, no. 12, Thai (2017)Google Scholar
- 9.Fernando, C., et al.: Design of TELESAR V for transferring bodily consciousness in telexistence. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, pp. 5112–5118 (2012)Google Scholar
- 11.Moore, J.: What is the sense of agency and why does it matter. Front. Psychol. 7, 1272 (2016)Google Scholar
- 15.Saraji, M., Sasaki, T., Matsumura, R., Minamizawa, K., Inami, M.: Fusion: full body surrogacy for collaborative communication. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, no. 7, Vancouver (2018)Google Scholar
- 16.Sugiura, Y., et al.: Cooky: a cooperative cooking robot system. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia, no. 17, Singapore (2011)Google Scholar
- 17.World Health Organization.: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (2007)Google Scholar