Digital-Physical Parity for Food Fraud Detection
- 1k Downloads
Food fraud has an adverse impact on all stakeholders in the food production and distribution process. Lack of transparency in food supply chains is a strong factor contributing to food fraud. With limited transparency, the insights on food supply chains are fragmented, and every participant has to rely on trusted third parties to assess food quality. Blockchain has been introduced to the food industry to enable transparency and visibility, but it can only protect the integrity of a digital representation of physical food, not the physical food directly. Tagging techniques, like barcodes and QR codes that are used to connect the physical food to its digital representation, are vulnerable to attacks. In this paper, we propose a blockchain-based solution to link physical items, like food, to their digital representations using physical attributes of the item. This solution is generic in its support for different methods to perform the physical checks; as a concrete example, we use machine learning models on visual features of food products, through regular and thermal photos. Furthermore, we use blockchain to introduce a reward system for supply chain participants, which incentivizes honesty and supplying data. We evaluate the technical feasibility of components of this architecture for food fraud detection using a real-world scenario, including machine-learning models for distinguishing between grain-fed and grass-fed beef.
KeywordsBlockchain Machine learning Food fraud
This research is supported by the Science and Industry Endowment Fund of Australia.
- 1.Food fraud vulnerability assessment and mitigation-are you doing enough to prevent food fraud? Technical report, PWC (2016)Google Scholar
- 2.Fleder, M., Kester, M.S., Pillai, S.: Bitcoin transaction graph analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.01657 (2015)
- 3.Lo, S.K., Xu, X., Chiam, Y.K., Lu, Q.: Evaluating suitability of applying blockchain. In: The 22nd ICECCS, November 2017Google Scholar
- 5.Staples, M.: Risks and opportunities for systems using blockchain and smart contracts. Technical report, Data61 (CSIRO), Sydney (2017)Google Scholar
- 6.Tian, F.: A supply chain traceability system for food safety based on HACCP, blockchain & internet of things. In: The 14th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, June 2017Google Scholar
- 9.Xu, X., et al.: The blockchain as a software connector. In: The 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, April 2016Google Scholar