Advertisement

Introduction

  • Xin Wei
  • Liang Zhou
Chapter
  • 118 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

With the rapid development of information technology and the establishment of “human-oriented” new type communication fashion, future multimedia service emphasizes not only speed, bandwidth, quality of service sources, but also user feeling and satisfaction. Therefore, for multimedia content providers and network operators, promoting users’ feeling or even their viscosity is very important in the context of multimedia service explosion and heavy competition. In other words, only by continuously improving the recognition and viscosity of users, positioning network services and operational activities into the most valuable user groups, service providers and network operators can achieve the optimization of resource allocation and continuous growth of industry revenue in the fierce competition. Traditional time-consuming and power-intensive user scoring methods can no longer satisfy the multimedia content provider and network operator’s evaluation of user satisfaction. Instead, multimedia users’ quality of experience (QoE) is evaluated by using the collected big data. Therefore, how to objectively and effectively evaluate multimedia user QoE by considering various influencing factors has become a hot and difficult topic in current research.

References

  1. 1.
    Cisco Visual Networking Index (2017) Global mobile data traffic forecast update. 2016–2021 White PaperGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen Y, Wu K, Zhang Q (2015) From QoS to QoE: a tutorial on video quality assessment. IEEE Commun Surv Tut 17(2):1126–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Skorin-Kapov L, Varela M, Hossfeld T, Chen KT (2018) A survey of emerging concepts and challenges for QoE management of multimedia services. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 14(2s):1–29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Moor K, Ketyko I, Joseph W, Deryckere T, De Marez L, Martens L, Verleye G (2010) Proposed framework for evaluating quality of experience in a mobile, testbed-oriented living lab setting. Mobile Netw Appl 15(3):378–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeng AH, Liu J, Xian J (2010) IPTV system architecture and main technologies. Commun Technol 43(3):171–174Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reibman AR, Kanumuri S, Vaishampayan V, Cosman PC (2004) Visibility of individual packet losses in MPEG-2 video. In: International conference on image processing, Singapore, Oct 24–27, pp 14–17Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cagnini HE, Barros RC, Basgalupp MP (2017) Estimation of distribution algorithms for decision-tree induction. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Donostia-San Sebastian, June 5–8, pp 2022–2029Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seshadrinathan K, Bovik AC (2010) Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(2):335–350MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rehman A, Wang Z (2012) Reduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(8):3378–3389MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang F, Wan S, Xie Q, Wu HR (2010) No-reference quality assessment for networked video via primary analysis of bit stream. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 20(11):1544–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin X, Ma H, Luo L, Chen Y (2012) No-reference video quality assessment in the compressed domain. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 58(2):505–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Usman M, Yang N, Jan MA, He X, Xu M, Lam KM (2018) A joint framework for QoS and QoE for video transmission over wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 17(4):746–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang R, Wei X, Zhou L, Lv C, Meng H, Jin J (2018) A survey of data-driven approach on multimedia QoE evaluation. Front Comp Sci 12(6):1060–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tu W (2018) Data-driven QoS and QoE management in smart cities: a tutorial study. IEEE Commun Mag 56(12):126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Wei
    • 1
  • Liang Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Nanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations