Advertisement

High-Resolution Sedimentary Paleoflood Records in Alluvial River Environments: A Review of Recent Methodological Advances and Application to Flood Hazard Assessment

  • Willem H. J. ToonenEmail author
  • Samuel E. Munoz
  • Kim M. Cohen
  • Mark G. Macklin
Chapter
  • 345 Downloads
Part of the Geography of the Physical Environment book series (GEOPHY)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss recent developments in paleoflood hydrology that are specific to the collection of high-resolution records from alluvial settings. We describe how to develop and analyze alluvial paleoflood records, including (i) the identification of suitable depositional niches in valley environments and the mechanisms of overbank deposition that lead to flood deposit accumulation at those locations, (ii) approaches for sample material collection and methods to measure the coarseness of individual flood units, (iii) data assessment and reconstruction of absolute and relative flood magnitudes from sedimentary information, and (iv) developing flood chronologies with a discussion of available dating techniques. We argue that alluvial paleoflood archives hold enormous potential for flood hazard assessments in densely populated low-lying areas despite the challenge of quantitative discharge reconstructions in dynamic floodplain settings.

Keywords

Extreme events Natural hazard Climate change Holocene Fluvial archive 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the INQUA (EX-AQUA) and PAGES floods working groups for stimulating research and discussion on the subject of paleoflood hydrology. Jürgen Herget and Alessandro Fontana are cordially thanked for the invitation to write this chapter and for editing this volume.

References

  1. Aitken MJ (1985) Thermoluminescence dating. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Asselman NEM (1999) Grain-size trends used to assess the effective discharge for floodplain sedimentation, River Waal, the Netherlands. J Sediment Res 69(1):51–61.  https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.69.51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker VR (2008) Paleoflood hydrology: origin, progress, prospects. Geomorphology 101(1):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beighley RE, Moglen GE (2003) Adjusting measured peak discharges from an urbanizing watershed to reflect a stationary land use signal. Water Resour Res 39(4).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002wr001846
  5. Benito G, Lang M, Barriendos M et al (2004) Use of systematic, palaeoflood and historical data for the improvement of flood risk estimation: review of scientific methods. Nat Hazards 31(3):623–643.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000024895.48463.ebCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Best J (2019) Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers. Nat Geosci 12(1):7–21.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0262-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaauw M, Christen JA (2011) Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process. Bayesian Anal 6(3):457–474.  https://doi.org/10.1214/11-BA618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blöschl G, Ardoin-Bardin S, Bonell M et al (2007) At what scales do climatic variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows? Hydrol Process 21(9):1241–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronk Ramsey CB (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronstert A, Bárdossy A, Bismuth C et al (2007) Multi-scale modelling of land-use change and river training effects on floods in the Rhine basin. River Res Appl 23(10):1102–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Condon LE, Gangopadhyay S, Pruitt T (2015) Climate change and non-stationary flood risk for the upper Truckee River basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(1):159–175.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-159-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cordier S (2010) Optically stimulated luminescence dating: procedures and applications to geomorphological research in France. Géomorphologie 16(1):21–40.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Czymzik M, Brauer A, Dulski P et al (2013) Orbital and solar forcing of shifts in Mid- to Late Holocene flood intensity from varved sediments of pre-Alpine Lake Ammersee (southern Germany). Quat Sci Rev 61:96–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czymzik M, Muscheler R, Brauer A (2016) Solar modulation of flood frequency in central Europe during spring and summer on interannual to multi-centennial timescales. Clim Past 12:799–805.  https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-799-2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duller GAT (2004) Luminescence dating of Quaternary sediments: recent advances. J Quat Sci 19(2):183–192.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EM-DAT (2019) The International Disaster Database, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). www.emdat.be. Accessed 18 Apr 2019
  17. Enzel Y, Ely LL, House PK et al (1993) Paleoflood evidence for a natural upper bound to flood magnitudes in the Colorado River basin. Water Resour Res 29(7):2287–2297.  https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evin G, Wilhelm B, Jenny JP (2019) Flood hazard assessment of the Rhone River revisited with reconstructed discharges from lake sediments. Glob Planet Change 172:114–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glopacha.2018.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frances F, Salas JD, Boes DC (1994) Flood frequency analysis with systematic and historical or paleoflood data based on the two-parameter general extreme value models. Water Resour Res 30(6):1653–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foulds SA, Griffiths HM, Macklin MG et al (2014) Geomorphological records of extreme floods and their relationship to decadal-scale climate change. Geomorphology 216:193–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foulds SA, Macklin MG (2016) A hydrogeomorphic assessment of twenty-first century floods in the UK. Earth Surf Process Landf 41(2):256–270.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuller IC, Macklin MG, Toonen WHJ et al (2018) Storm-generated Holocene and historical floods in the Manawatu River, New Zealand. Geomorphology 310:102–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gregory KJ, Benito G (2003) Palaeohydrology: understanding global change. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall J, Arheimer B, Borga M et al (2014) Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18(7):2735–2772.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2735-2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harden T, Macklin MG, Baker VR (2010) Holocene flood histories in south-western USA. Earth Surf Process Landf 35(6):707–716.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heiri O, Lotter AF, Lemcke G (2001) Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. J Palaeolimnol 25(1):101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008119611481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herget J, Meurs H (2010) Reconstructing peak discharge for historic flood levels in the city of Cologne, Germany. Glob Planet Change 70(1–4):108–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glopacha.2009.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herget J (2019—this volume) Palaeostage indicators in rivers—an illustrated review. In: Herget J, Fontana A (eds) Palaeohydrology—traces, tracks and trails of extreme events. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  29. Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1986) Paleoflood hydrology and flood frequency analysis. Water Resour Res 22(4):543–550.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i004p00543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hu J, Emile-Geay J, Partin J (2017) Correlation-based interpretations of paleoclimate data–where statistics meet past climates. Earth Planet Sci Let 459:362–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (in press)Google Scholar
  33. Jones AF, Macklin MG, Lewin J (2010) Flood series data for the later Holocene: available approaches, potential and limitations from UK alluvial sediments. The Holocene 20(7):1123–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683610369501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones AF, Macklin MG, Brewer PA (2012) A geochemical record of flooding on the upper River Severn, UK, during the last 3750 years. Geomorphology 179:89–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones AF, Turner JN, Daly JS et al (2018) Late Holocene sedimentary flood records in UK and Irish river catchments. In: Proceedings of the FLAG meeting, University of Liège, Liège, 3–4 Sept 2018Google Scholar
  36. Kidson R, Richards KS (2005) Flood frequency analysis: assumptions and alternatives. Prog Phys Geogr 29(3):392–410.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp454raCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klemeš V (2000) Tall tales about tails of hydrological distributions. I. J Hydrol Eng 5(3):227–231.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:3(227)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knox JC (1993) Large increases in flood magnitude in response to modest changes in climate. Nature 361:430–432.  https://doi.org/10.1038/361430a0DOCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knox JC (2006) Floodplain sedimentation in the Upper Mississippi Valley: natural versus human accelerated. Geomorphology 79:286–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knox JC (2007) The Mississippi river system. In: Gupta A (ed) Large rivers: geomorphology and management. Wiley, pp 145–182Google Scholar
  41. Kochel RC, Baker VR (1982) Paleoflood hydrology. Science 215:353–361.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.215.4531.353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Konert M, Vandenbergh J (1997) Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the under-estimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology 44(3):523–535.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.1997.d01-38.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kundzewicz ZW, Radziejewski M, Piñskwar I (2006) Precipitation extremes in the changing climate of Europe. Clim Res 31:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.3354/cr031051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leigh DS (2018) Vertical accretion sand proxies of gaged floods along the upper Little Tennessee River, Blue Ridge Mountains, USA. Sediment Geol 364:342–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewin J, Macklin MG (2003) Preservation potential for Late Quaternary river alluvium. J Quat Sci 18(2):107–120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewin J, Ashworth PJ (2014) The negative relief of large river floodplains. Earth Sci Rev 129:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Machado MJ, Botero BA, Lopez J et al (2015) Flood frequency analysis of historical data under stationary and non-stationary modelling. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(6):2561–2576.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2561-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Macklin MG, Brewer PA, Hudson-Edwards KA et al (2006) A geomorphological approach to the management of rivers contaminated by metal mining. Geomorphology 79(3–4):423–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gemorph.2006.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Macklin MG, Lewin J (2008) Alluvial responses to the changing Earth system. Earth Surf Process Landf 33(9):1374–1395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Macklin MG, Lewin J (2018) River stresses in anthropogenic times: large-scale global patterns and extended environmental timelines. Prog Phys Geog 43(1):3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133318803013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merz B, Nguyen VD, Vorogushyn S (2016) Temporal clustering of floods in Germany: do flood-rich and flood-poor periods exist? J Hydrol 541(B):824–838.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Minderhoud PSJ, Cohen KM, Toonen WHJ et al (2016) Improving age-depth models of fluvio-lacustrine deposits using sedimentary proxies for accumulation rates. Quat Geochronol 33:35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2016.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M et al (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319(5863):573–574.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morehead MD, Syvitski JP, Hutton EWH et al (2003) Modeling the temporal variability in the flux of sediment from ungauged river basins. Glob Planet Change 39(1–2):95–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00019-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mudelsee M, Börngen M, Tetzlaff G et al (2004) Extreme floods in central Europe over the past 5000 years: role of cyclone pathway ‘Zugstrasse Vb’. J Geophys Res: Atmos 109(D23).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005034.d23101
  56. Munoz S, Dee S (2017) El Nino increases the risk of lower Mississippi River flooding. Sci Rep 7:1772.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01919-6DOCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Munoz SE, Giosan L, Therell MD et al (2018) Climatic control of Mississippi River flood hazard amplified by river engineering. Nature 556:95–98.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Naylor LA, Spencer T, Lane SN et al (2017) Stormy geomorphology: geomorphic contributions in an age of climate extremes. Earth Surf Process Landf 42(1):166–190.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. NOAA/NCEI (2018) U.S. Billion-Dollar weather and climate disasters. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration / National Centers for Environmental Information. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/overview. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
  60. Oldfield F, Rummery TA, Thompson R et al (1979) Identification of suspended sediment sources by means of magnetic measurements: some preliminary results. Water Resour Res 15(2):211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR015i002p00211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peng F, Prins MA, Kasse C et al (2019) An improved method for paleoflood reconstruction and flooding phase identification, applied to the Meuse River in the Netherlands. Glob Planet Change 177:213–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richardson JM, Fuller IC, Macklin MG et al (2013) Holocene river behaviour in New Zealand: response to regional centennial-scale climate forcing. Quat Sci Rev 69:8–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.02.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schulte L, Pena JC, Carvalho F et al (2015) A 2600-year history of floods in the Bernese Alps, Switzerland: frequencies, mechanisms and climate forcing. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(7):3047–3072.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3047-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith JA, Baeck ML (2015) Prophetic vision, vivid imagination: the 1927 Mississippi River flood. Water Resour Res 51(12):9964–9994.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stedinger JR, Cohn TA (1986) Flood frequency analysis with historical and paleoflood information. Water Resour Res 22(5):785–793.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i005p00785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. St. George S, Mudelsee M (2018) The weight of the flood-of-record in flood frequency analysis. J Flood Risk Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12512 (in press)
  67. Toonen WHJ, Kleinhans MG, Cohen KM (2012) Sedimentary architecture of abandoned channel fills. Earth Surf Process Landf 37(4):459–472.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Toonen WHJ (2013) A Holocene flood record of the Lower Rhine. Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 41Google Scholar
  69. Toonen WHJ, de Molenaar MM, Bunnik FPM et al (2013) Middle Holocene palaeoflood extremes of the Lower Rhine. Hydrol Res 44(2):248–263.  https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Toonen WHJ, Winkels TG, Cohen KM et al (2015) Lower Rhine historical flood magnitudes of the last 450 years reproduced from grain-size measurements of flood deposits using end member modelling. CATENA 130:69–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Toonen WHJ, Middelkoop H, Konijnendijk TYM et al (2016) The influence of hydroclimatic variability of flood frequency in the Lower Rhine. Earth Surf Process Landf 41(9):1266–1275.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Toonen WHJ, Foulds SA, Macklin MG et al (2017) Events, episodes, and phases: signal from noise in flood-sediment archives. Geology 45(4):331–334.  https://doi.org/10.1130/G38540.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vorogushyn S, Merz B (2013) Flood trends along the Rhine: the role of river training. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(10):3871–3884.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3871-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wallemarq P, Below R, McLean D (2018) UNISDR and CRED report: Economic Losses, Poverty & Disasters (1998–2017). https://www.emdat.be/publications. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
  75. Wilhelm B, Ballesteros Cánovas JA, Corella Aznar JP et al (2018) Recent advances in paleoflood hydrology: from new archives to data compilation and analysis. Water Secur 3:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2018.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilhelm B, Ballesteros Cánovas JA, Macdonald N et al (2019) Interpreting historical, botanical, and geological evidence to aid preparations for future floods. WIREs Water 6(1):e1318.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wirth SB, Glur L, Gilli A et al (2013) Holocene flood frequency across the Central Alps: solar forcing and evidence for variations in North Atlantic atmospheric circulation. Quat Sci Rev 80:112–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem H. J. Toonen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samuel E. Munoz
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kim M. Cohen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Mark G. Macklin
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Egyptology Unit, Faculty of ArtsKU LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Marine and Environmental SciencesNortheastern UniversityNahantUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Physical GeographyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Applied Geology and GeophysicsDeltaresUtrechtThe Netherlands
  6. 6.School of Geography and Lincoln Centre for Water and Planetary Health, University of LincolnLincolnUK
  7. 7.Innovative River Solutions, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  8. 8.Centre for the Study of the Inland, La Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations