Abstract
Multibody modeling allows reproducible and comparative analyses of shoulder dynamics after total shoulder replacement (TSR). For inverse dynamics an accurate representation of the musculoskeletal kinematics from motion capture is fundamental. Although current optimization-based approaches effectively identify the underlying skeletal motion in terms of position, velocities and accelerations are not consistently provided. The purpose was therefore to introduce a multibody model of the shoulder complex after TSR implantation with detailed representation of the muscle apparatus that directly generates the musculoskeletal kinematics from motion capture data. The inherent inverse kinematics problem is resolved by implementation of a potential field method. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the model’s tracking capability. Scapular motion showed overall good agreement with measurements from the literature. The approach yields equivalent results to current approaches with the benefit of directly computing accelerations without formulation of an optimization problem. The multibody model presented will be used for further inverse dynamics analyses regarding various loading conditions of different TSR designs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andersen, M.S., Damsgaard, M., Rasmussen, J.: Kinematic analysis of over-determinate biomechanical systems. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 12, 371–384 (2009)
Andersen, M.S., Damsgaard, M., MacWilliams, B., et al.: A computationally efficient optimisation-based method for parameter identification of kinematically determinate and over-determinate biomechanical systems. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 13, 171–183 (2010)
Begon, M., Dal Maso, F., Arndt, A., et al.: Can optimal marker weightings improve thoracohumeral kinematics accuracy? J. Biomech. 48, 2019–2025 (2015)
Begon, M., Bélaise, C., Naaim, A., et al.: Multibody kinematics optimization with marker projection improves the accuracy of the humerus rotational kinematics. J. Biomech. 62, 117–123 (2017)
Bohsali, K.I., Wirth, M.A., Rockwood Jr., C.A.: Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88, 2279–2292 (2006)
Dal Maso, F., Raison, M., Lundberg, A., et al.: Coupling between 3D displacements and rotations at the glenohumeral joint during dynamic tasks in healthy participants. Clin. Biomech. 29, 1048–1055 (2014)
Fohanno, V., Begon, M., Lacouture, P., et al.: Estimating joint kinematics of a whole body chain model with closed-loop constraints. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 31, 433–449 (2014)
El Habachi, A., Duprey, S., Chèze, L., et al.: A parallel mechanism of the shoulder - application to multi-body optimisation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 33, 439–451 (2015)
Ludewig, P.M., Phadke, V., Braman, J.P., et al.: Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91(2), 378–389 (2009)
Martins, A., Quental, C., Folgado, J., et al.: Computational reverse shoulder prosthesis model: experimental data and verification. J. Biomech. 48, 3242–3251 (2015)
Matsui, K., Shimada, K., Andrew, P.D.: Deviation of skin marker from bone target during movement of the scapula. J. Orthop. Sci. 11(2), 180–184 (2006)
Meskers, C.G., Vermeulen, H.M., de Groot, J.H., et al.: 3D shoulder position measurements using a six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device. Clin. Biomech. 13, 280–292 (1998)
Naaim, A., Moissenet, F., Duprey, S., et al.: Effect of various upper limb multibody models on soft tissue artefact correction: a case study. J. Biomech. 62, 102–109 (2017)
Nikooyan, A.A., Veeger, H.E., Westerhoff, P., et al.: Validation of the Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model using in-vivo glenohumeral joint contact forces. J. Biomech. 43, 3007–3014 (2010)
Quental, C., Folgado, J., Ambròsio, J., et al.: A multibody biomechanical model of the upper limb including the shoulder girdle. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 28, 83–108 (2012)
Sperling, J.W., Hawkins, R.J., Walch, G., et al.: Complications in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 95(6), 563–569 (2013)
Spitzer, V., Ackerman, M.J., Scherzinger, A.L., et al.: The visible human male: a technical report. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 3, 118–130 (1996)
Wallrapp, O., Grund, T., Böhm, H.: Human motion analysis and dynamic simulation of rowing. In: Proceedings of 2005 ECCOMAS Thematic Conference Multibody Dynamics, Madrid, Spain (2005)
Wu, G., van der Helm, F.C., Veeger, H.E., et al.: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J. Biomech. 38, 981–992 (2005)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WO 452/11-1, BA 3347/14-1 and HE 7885/1-1) for supporting the research work presented, and Mr. Hannes Wackerle, Trauma Center Murnau, for providing the motion capture data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Herrmann, S. et al. (2020). A Detailed Kinematic Multibody Model of the Shoulder Complex After Total Shoulder Replacement. In: Kecskeméthy, A., Geu Flores, F. (eds) Multibody Dynamics 2019. ECCOMAS 2019. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23132-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23132-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23131-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23132-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)