Convergence of Local Enterprises with Large Corporations: Bridging Industry 4.0 Functions on Broader Business Canvass

  • RajagopalEmail author


This chapter analyzes socio-political determinants of micro, small, and medium enterprises and critically examines the micro-and macro-economic factors that would help managers develop competitive business projects within the existing business environment in a given marketplace. It is argued that organizational learning among local-global companies enhances executive competencies, broadens project management perspectives, and helps everyone involved in the innovative business projects in planning and implementing projects in a complex and nonlinear business environment. The attributes of various decision drivers in reference to changing organizational cultures in local-global enterprises have been discussed in this chapter. The chapter discusses basic entrepreneurial attributes required to develop and implement innovative business projects and guides the process of managing resources and project cost rationally. It is a precondition for building and implementing innovative business projects to create a right and sustainable market to absorb the thrust of innovative products. This chapter discusses ways for market creation and developing leadership. In addition, this chapter discusses several ways to identify and define qualitative attributes of a good project and qualitative processes to carry out the innovative business projects successfully to gain competitive advantage in the marketplace.


  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Sandberg, B., & Lehtimäki, T. (2014). Networks for the commercialization of innovations: A review of how divergent network actors contribute. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkinshaw, J., Bessant, J., & Delbridge, R. (2007). Finding, forming, and performing: Creating networks for discontinuous innovation. California Management Review, 49(3), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chakravorti, B. (2004). The role of adoption networks in the success of innovations: A strategic perspective. Technology in Society, 26(2–3), 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiambaretto, P., Bengtsson, M., Fernandez, A. S., & Näsholm, M. H. (2019). Small and large firms’ trade-off between benefits and risks when choosing a coopetitor for innovation. Long Range Planning.
  5. Cole, R. A., & Sokolyk, T. (2018). Debt financing, survival, and growth of start-up firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, G. S. (1990). Market driven strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. de-Oliveira, F., & Rodil-Marzábal, Ó. (2019). Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dey, A., Gupta, A. K., & Singh, G. (2019). Innovation, investment and enterprise: Climate resilient entrepreneurial pathways for overcoming poverty. Agricultural Systems, 172, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frishammar, J., Richtnér, A., Brattström, A., Magnusson, M., & Björk, J. (2019). Opportunities and challenges in the new innovation landscape: Implications for innovation auditing and innovation management. European Management Journal, 37(2), 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Quevedo, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127(1), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gulati, R. (2007). Managing network resources. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hills, G. E., Hansen, D. J., & Hultman, C. (2005). A value creation view of opportunity recognition processes. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(4), 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hultman, C. M., & Hills, G. E. (2011). Influence from entrepreneurship in marketing theory. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Locke, K. D. (2000). Grounded theory in management research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 49, 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nguyen, N. M., Killen, C. P., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2018). The use of effectuation in projects: The influence of business case control, portfolio monitoring intensity and project innovativeness. International Journal of Project Management, 36(8), 1054–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Dwyer, M., Gilmore, A., & Carson, D. (2009). Innovative marketing in SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1–2), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ortiz-Villajos, J. M., & Sotoca, S. (2018). Innovation and business survival: A long-term approach. Research Policy, 47(8), 1418–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pacauskas, D., Rajala, R., Westerlund, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2018). Harnessing user innovation for social media marketing: Case study of a crowdsourced hamburger. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petit, O., Velasco, C., & Spence, C. (2019). Digital sensory marketing: Integrating new technologies into multisensory online experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45, 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Proikaki, M., Nikolaou, I., Jones, N., Malesios, C., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., & Evangelinos, K. (2018). Community perceptions of local enterprises in environmentally degraded areas. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 73, 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajagopal. (2012). Brand manifestation and retrieval effects as drivers of buying behavior in Mexico. Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 19(3), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rajagopal. (2016). Innovative business projects: Breaking complexities, building performance (Vol. 1) – Fundamentals and project environment. New York: Business Expert Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rajagopal. (2019). Contemporary marketing strategy: Analyzing consumer behavior to drive managerial decision making. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reeves, M., & Deimler, M. (2011). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 7(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  28. Revilla, E., & Rodríguez-Prado, B. (2018). Building ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms: Contextual drivers of innovation success. Research Policy, 47(9), 1611–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reyes-Santiago, M., Sánchez-Medina, P. S., & Díaz-Pichardo, R. (2017). Eco-innovation and organizational culture in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 65, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saldanha, F. P., Cohendet, P., & Pozzebon, M. (2014). Challenging the stage-gate model in crowdsourcing: The case of Fiat Mio in Brazil. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(9), 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Senge, P., & Carstedt, G. (2001). Innovating our way to the next industrial revolution. Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 24–38.Google Scholar
  33. Sung, T. K. (2018). Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sull, D. N. (2004). Disciplined entrepreneurship. Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 71–77.Google Scholar
  35. van den Berg, M., Slot, R., van Steenbergen, M., Faasse, P., & van Vliet, H. (2019). How enterprise architecture improves the quality of IT investment decisions. Journal of Systems and Software, 152, 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson, P. J., & Yin, E. (2014). Accelerated innovation: The new challenge from China. Sloan Management Review, 55(4), 27–34.Google Scholar
  37. Wu, J., Lao, K. F., Wan, F., & Li, J. (2019). Competing with multinational enterprises’ entry: Search strategy, environmental complexity, and survival of local firms. International Business Review. Scholar
  38. Winter, A., & Govindarajan, V. (2015). Engineering reverse innovations: Principles for creating successful products for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 93(7/8), 80–89.Google Scholar
  39. Zhang, Z., & Hou, Y. (2017). The effect of perceived risk on information search for innovative products and services: The moderating role of innate consumer innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(3), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EGADE Business SchoolMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations