Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

IPL for Hair Removal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aesthetic Applications of Intense Pulsed Light

  • 918 Accesses

Abstract

The hair follicle is a complex, hormonally active structure, which constitutes the foundation for hair growth. The hair growth cycle has three phases: anagen, catagen and telogen. The anagen phase is the growth phase, the catagen phase is the regression phase and the telogen phase is the rest phase. The hair follicle is the most susceptible to IPL treatment during the anagen phase. The melanin is the target chromophore for hair removal.

Hirsutism is a dermatological condition in women represented by excessive hair growth, distributed in a male-like pattern. Hypertrichosis is represented by excessive growth of coarser and longer hair than is normal for the age, sex and race of the person. Occasionally, hair removal can also have non-cosmetic applications (hair removal of flaps, treatment of areas with recurrent folliculitis, etc.). Nowadays, there are three methods of permanent hair removal: electrolysis, IPL and laser treatment. As in lasers systems, the mechanism of action of IPL hair removal is based on the principle of selective photothermolysis: light is absorbed by the target endogenous chromophore (melanin) in dermal papilla and the bulge area of anagen hair follicles, produces thermal energy destroying hair-producing papilla with sparing the epidermal melanin. The heat-induced destruction of the hair shaft leads to hair “dropout”. The partial injury to the germinative zone leads to telogen-shock response, prolonged telogen dropout, and development of dystrophic hairs which are thinner in texture and have variable pigmentation.

Initial consultation should include a thorough anamnesis, including questions to identify endocrinological problems; physical examination of the desired anatomic region; and matching of expectations—since most patients interpret “permanent hair removal” as no hair regrowth ever. Patients should be explained that multiple treatments are usually needed. If no improvement is obtained after 7–8 sessions, treatment interruption should be considered. Preparations should include sunscreen for 4–6 weeks before the treatment (and between treatments); shaving; signing an informed consent and pre-procedure photographs; and applying safety precautions (eye protection, skin preparation, etc.). Most physicians perform treatments 4–6 weeks apart. Treatment parameters need to be adjusted according to the previous results. The darker the skin and the brighter the hair, the less effective the treatment will be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aimonetti JM, Ribot-Ciscar E. Pain management in photoepilation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(2):194–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan BA. The dermal papilla: an instructive niche for epithelial stem and progenitor cells in development and regeneration of the hair follicle. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4:a015180.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross EV. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis: a new recipe for hair cooking? Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(5):413–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandt N, Troilius A, Drosner M. Epilation today: physiology of the hair follicle and clinical photo-epilation. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2005;10(3):271–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Warner J, Weiner M, Gutowski KA. Laser hair removal. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):389–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohyama M. Hair follicle bulge: a fascinating reservoir of epithelial stem cells. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;46(2):81–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg DJ. Laser- and light-based hair removal: an update. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(2):253–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alonso L, Fuchs E. The hair cycle. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 3):391–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greppi I. Diode laser hair removal of the black patient. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(2):150–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadick NS, Prieto VG. The use of a new diode laser for hair removal. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(1):30–3; discussion 33-34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Godynicki S, Gasse H, Schwarz R, et al. Nutritional and functional blood vessels of anagen and telogen vibrissal follicles in the cat. Acta Anat (Basel). 1997;160(2):83–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vissing AC, Taudorf EH, Haak CS, et al. Adjuvant eflornithine to maintain IPL-induced hair reduction in women with facial hirsutism: a randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(2):314–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller SA. Hirsutism. Am J Med. 1969;46(5):803–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961;21:1440–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrmann DA, Rosenfield RL. Clinical review 10: an endocrinologic approach to the patient with hirsutism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;71(1):1–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liew SH. Unwanted body hair and its removal: a review. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(6):431–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin KA, Chang RJ, Ehrmann DA, et al. Evaluation and treatment of hirsutism in premenopausal women: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(4):1105–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenfield RL. Clinical practice. Hirsutism N Engl J Med. 2005;353(24):2578–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Conn JJ, Jacobs HS. The clinical management of hirsutism. Eur J Endocrinol. 1997;136(4):339–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falsetti L, Galbignani E. Long-term treatment with the combination ethinylestradiol and cyproterone acetate in polycystic ovary syndrome. Contraception. 1990;42(6):611–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wendelin DS, Pope DN, Mallory SB. Hypertrichosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(2):161–79; quiz 180-161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaidya T, Kumar DD. Hair, laser removal. StatPearls [internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Radmanesh M. Paradoxical hypertrichosis and terminal hair change after intense pulsed light hair removal therapy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2009;20(1):52–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moreno-Arias GA, Vilalta-Solsona A, Serra-Renom JM, et al. Intense pulsed light for hairy grafts and flaps. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(5):402–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuriloff DB, Finn DG, Kimmelman CP. Pharyngoesophageal hair growth: the role of laser epilation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;98(4):342–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gil-Vernet A, Arango O, Gil-Vernet J Jr, et al. Scrotal flap epilation in urethroplasty: concepts and technique. J Urol. 1995;154(5):1723–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karacaoglan N. Hair growth in the vagina after reconstruction with pudendal thigh flaps in congenital vaginal agenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(6):1618.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gorgu M, Aslan G, Akoz T, et al. Comparison of alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(1):37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haedersdal M, Gotzsche PC. Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD004684.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haedersdal M, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(1):9–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bjerring P, Cramers M, Egekvist H, et al. Hair reduction using a new intense pulsed light irradiator and a normal mode ruby laser. J Cutan Laser Ther. 2000;2(2):63–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Toosi P, Sadighha A, Sharifian A, et al. A comparison study of the efficacy and side effects of different light sources in hair removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2006;21(1):1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Amin SP, Goldberg DJ. Clinical comparison of four hair removal lasers and light sources. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;8(2):65–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marayiannis KB, Vlachos SP, Savva MP, et al. Efficacy of long- and short pulse alexandrite lasers compared with an intense pulsed light source for epilation: a study on 532 sites in 389 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2003;5(3–4):140–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Klein A, Steinert S, Baeumler W, et al. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial. J Dermatol. 2013;168(6):1287–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Goh CL. Comparative study on a single treatment response to long pulse Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulse light therapy for hair removal on skin type IV to VI--is longer wavelengths lasers preferred over shorter wavelengths lights for assisted hair removal. J Dermatolog Treat. 2003;14(4):243–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Szima GZ, Janka EA, Kovács A, et al. Comparison of hair removal efficacy and side effect of neodymium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and intense pulsed light systems (18-month follow-up). J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(2):193–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martella A, Raichi M. Photoepilation and skin photorejuvenation: an update. Dermatol Rep. 2017;9(1):7116.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(6):869–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Grossman MWJ, Dwyer P, Flotte T, et al. PDT for hirsutism. Lasers Surg Med. 1995;7(suppl):44.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nahavandi H, Neumann R, Holzer G, et al. Evaluation of safety and efficacy of variable pulsed light in the treatment of unwanted hair in 77 volunteers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(3):311–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holzer G, Nahavandi H, Neumann R, et al. Photoepilation with variable pulsed light in non-facial body areas: evaluation of efficacy and safety. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(5):518–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. El-Domyati M, Hosam W, Moftah NH, et al. Hair follicle changes following intense pulsed light axillary hair reduction: histometrical, histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Arch Dermatol Res. 2017;309(3):191–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ross EV, Ladin Z, Kreindel M, et al. Theoretical considerations in laser hair removal. Dermatol Clin. 1999;17(2):333–55, viii.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Slominski A, Paus R. Melanogenesis is coupled to murine anagen: toward new concepts for the role of melanocytes and the regulation of melanogenesis in hair growth. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;101(1 Suppl):90S–7S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sadick NS, Weiss RA, Shea CR, et al. Long-term photoepilation using a broad-spectrum intense pulsed light source. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(11):1336–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sadick NS, Shea CR, Burchette JL Jr, et al. High-intensity flashlamp photoepilation: a clinical, histological, and mechanistic study in human skin. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(6):668–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lin TY, Manuskiatti W, Dierickx CC, et al. Hair growth cycle affects hair follicle destruction by ruby laser pulses. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111(1):107–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roosen GF, Westgate GE, Philpott M, et al. Temporary hair removal by low fluence photoepilation: histological study on biopsies and cultured human hair follicles. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40(8):520–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Marwaha S, et al. Hair removal with a non-coherent filtered flashlamp intense pulsed light source. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;24(2):128–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S. Histologic evaluation of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in the nonablative treatment of wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(8):744–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, et al. Long-term epilation using the EpiLight broad band, intense pulsed light hair removal system. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(10):909–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Troilius A, Troilius C. Hair removal with a second generation broad spectrum intense pulsed light source--a long-term follow-up. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(3):173–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Moreno-Arias G, Castelo-Branco C, Ferrando J. Paradoxical effect after IPL photoepilation. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(11):1013–6; discussion 1016

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Srinivas CR, Kumaresan M. Lasers for vascular lesions: standard guidelines of care. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(3):349–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Roenigk HH Jr, Pinski JB, Robinson JK, et al. Acne, retinoids, and dermabrasion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1985;11(4):396–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zachariae H. Delayed wound healing and keloid formation following argon laser treatment or dermabrasion during isotretinoin treatment. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118(5):703–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bernestein LJ, Geronemus RG. Keloid formation with the 585-nm pulsed dye laser during isotretinoin treatment. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(1):111–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McDonald KA, Shelley AJ, Alavi A. A systematic review on oral isotretinoin therapy and clinically observable wound healing in acne patients. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;21(4):325–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Khatri KA, Garcia V. Light-assisted hair removal in patients undergoing isotretinoin therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(6):875–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Prather HB, Alam M, Poon E, et al. Laser safety in isotretinoin use: a survey of expert opinion and practice. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(3):357–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mysore V, Mahadevappa OH, Barua S. Standard guidelines of care: performing procedures in patients on or recently administered with isotretinoin. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2017;10(4):186–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Riml S, Larcher L, Grohmann M, et al. Second-degree burn within a tattoo after intense-pulsed-light epilation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2013;29(4):218–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dierickx C. Laser-assisted hair removal: state of art. Dermatol Ther. 2000;13:80–9.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sanchez LA, Perez M, Azziz R. Laser hair reduction in the hirsute patient: a critical assessment. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(2):169–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lask G, Eckhouse S, Slatkine M, et al. The role of laser and intense light sources in photo-epilation: a comparative evaluation. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(1):3–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gan SD, Graber EM. Laser hair removal: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(6):823–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Weir VM, Woo TY. Photo-assisted epilation--review and personal observations. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(3):135–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Drosner M, Adatto M. Photo-epilation: guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7(1):33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Paasch U, Schwandt A, Seeber N, et al. New lasers and light sourcessold and new risks? J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017;15(5):487–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lor P, Lennartz B, Ruedlinger R. Patient satisfaction study of unwanted facial and body hair: 5 years experience with intense pulsed light. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2002;4(3–4):73–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Fodor L, Menachem M, Ramon Y, et al. Hair removal using intense pulsed light (EpiLight): patient satisfaction, our experience, and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(1):8–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Moreno-Arias GA, Castelo-Branco C, Ferrando J. Side-effects after IPL photodepilation. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(12):1131–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gay-Escoda C, Párraga-Manzol G, Sánchez-Torres A, et al. Chronic neuropathic facial pain after intense pulsed light hair removal. Clinical features and pharmacological management. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(4):e544–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Tse Y. Hair removal using a pulsed-intense light source. Dermatol Clin. 1999;17(2):373–85, ix

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Johnson F, Dovale M. Intense pulsed light treatment of hirsutism: case reports of skin phototypes V and VI. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(4):233–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hee Lee J, Huh CH, Yoon HJ, et al. Photoepilation results of axillary hair in dark-skinned patients by IPL: a comparison between different wavelength and pulse width. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(2):234–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Clement M, Daniel G, Trelles M. Optimising the design of a broad-band light source for the treatment of skin. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7(3–4):177–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yaghmai D, Garden JM, Bakus AD, et al. Hair removal using a combination radio-frequency and intense pulsed light source. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6(4):201–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Weaver SM 3rd, Sagaral EC. Treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae using the long-pulse Nd:YAG laser on skin types V and VI. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(12):1187–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Moreno-Arias GA, Ferrando J. Noncoherent-intense-pulsed light for the treatment of relapsing hairy intradermal melanocytic nevus after shave excision. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(2):142–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Moreno-Arias GA, Navarra E, Vilalta A, et al. Corrective photoepilation for improper hairline placement after hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(8):790–2; discussion 792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Schroeter CA, Groenewegen JS, Reineke T, et al. Ninety percent permanent hair reduction in transsexual patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51(3):243–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plastic Surgery “Technion” Faculty of Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

    Yehuda Ullmann

  2. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

    Yehuda Ullmann & Yeela Ben Naftali

Authors
  1. Yehuda Ullmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yeela Ben Naftali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emergency District Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Lucian Fodor

  2. Director Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

    Yehuda Ullmann

Multiple Choice Questions

Multiple Choice Questions

9.1.1 Q1: During Which Phase Hair Follicle Is the Most Susceptible to IPL Treatment?

  1. (a)

    Anagen phase.

  2. (b)

    Telogen phase.

  3. (c)

    Catagen phase.

  4. (d)

    Regression phase.

9.1.2 Q2: Which One of the Following Statements Regarding Melanin in IPL Photoepilation Is Correct?

  1. (a)

    Melanin absorbs light in the range of 690–1000 nm.

  2. (b)

    Erythromelanin granules are present in red hair.

  3. (c)

    Due to paucity of melanin in blond hair, it is less susceptible to IPL treatment.

  4. (d)

    All answers are correct.

9.1.3 Q3: What Is the Most Common Hormonal Cause of Hirsutism ?

  1. (a)

    Cushing disease.

  2. (b)

    Polycystic ovary disease.

  3. (c)

    Hypothyroidism.

  4. (d)

    Adrenal gland hyperplasia.

9.1.4 Q4: Which of the Following Is the Most Suitable Laser for Photoepilation in a Dark-Skin Individual?

  1. (a)

    Alexandrite laser.

  2. (b)

    Ruby laser.

  3. (c)

    Nd:YAG laser.

  4. (d)

    Diode laser.

9.1.5 Q5: For Each of the Following Wavelengths, Select the Corresponding Laser Type:

  1. A.

    755 nm

  2. B.

    694 nm

  3. C.

    1064 nm

  4. D.

    810 nm

    1. (a)

      Ruby

    2. (b)

      Alexandrite

    3. (c)

      Diode

    4. (d)

      Nd:YAG

9.1.6 Q6: Prior to IPL Hair Removal, What Would You Recommend to Your Patient?

  1. (a)

    Do no shave for 4–6 weeks before the procedure.

  2. (b)

    Do not tan for a few weeks before the procedure.

  3. (c)

    Use depilatory creams as a preparation, a week before for the procedure.

  4. (d)

    Use Wax hair removal as a preparation, a week before for the procedure.

9.1.7 Q7: Which One of the Following Statements Regarding the Pain in Photoepilation Is Correct?

  1. (a)

    Longer wavelengths are more painful.

  2. (b)

    Longer pulse delays are more painful.

  3. (c)

    Higher fluences are more painful.

  4. (d)

    Topical anesthetic agents are mandatory in small areas.

9.1.8 Q8: Which of the Following Would Minimize Complications in Photoepilation of Dark Skin Patients?

  1. (a)

    Shorter wavelengths.

  2. (b)

    Shorter pulse durations.

  3. (c)

    Cooling systems.

  4. (d)

    All answers are incorrect.

9.1.9 Q9: Which One of the Following Statements Regarding Post-Procedure Complications in IPL Photoepilation Is Correct?

  1. (a)

    Post-treatment pain is common.

  2. (b)

    Scarring is an uncommon complication.

  3. (c)

    Paradoxical hypertrichosis is more common in skin type III.

  4. (d)

    All answers are correct.

9.1.10 Q10: Which One of the Following Statements Regarding the Treatment Is Not Correct?

  1. (a)

    Avoiding sun exposure between treatments is important.

  2. (b)

    When side-effects or complications are encountered, the fluence may be decreased by about 2–4 J/cm2.

  3. (c)

    The usual treatment interval is 3 months.

  4. (d)

    The brighter the hair, the less effective the treatment will be.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ullmann, Y., Ben Naftali, Y. (2020). IPL for Hair Removal. In: Fodor, L., Ullmann, Y. (eds) Aesthetic Applications of Intense Pulsed Light. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22829-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22829-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22828-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22829-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation