Skip to main content

The Tactical Management Method “DENICA” in Practice: Business Cases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tactical Management in Complexity

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 510 Accesses

Abstract

To complement the intention of addressing real-world problems through rigorous and relevant methods, we iterated a Design Science Research in four companies with international outreach in developed and developing Europe. The tactical management issues have been identified and addressed, in direct collaboration with the top, middle, and operational managers. Our collaborates have been introduced to the DENICA method and the Sense-and-Respond framework and have been guided and coached throughout the implementation and process of use. We observed the behavior of the managerial system in strategic and tactical terms, both managerially and informationally. In this chapter, we will present the actual developments, and how all stakeholders’ understanding evolved through time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2008). Evaluation risks in design science research: A framework. In: International conference on design science research in information systems and technology (pp 329–334).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bella, G., & Paulson, L. C. (2006). Accountability protocols: Formalized and verified. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 9(2), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151414.1151416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crim, T. A. (2014). Developing sense-and-respond capability in a mobile service firm enabled by dispatching technology: An action research study. Dissertation, Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal, 14, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forno, D. J. (2012). Applying sense & respond to create adaptive organizations (pp. 1–19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, S. H. (1997). ABI white paper: The development & application of organizational knowledge (pp. 1–13). New York: IBM Advanced Business Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, S. H. (2003). A brief history of technology, thought, work and management. In Management – IBM Almaden symposium on coevolution of technological and business innovations (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, S. H. (2004). Peripheral vision: Sensing and acting on weak signals making meaning out of apparent noise: The need for a new managerial framework. Long Range Planning, 37, 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, S. H. (2016a). Adaptive enterprise: The workbook. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Available from https://www.amazon.com/dp/1535437944

  • Haeckel, S. H. (2016b). Sense & respond: Designing and governing adaptive organizations. Accessed January 10, 2013, from http://www.senseandrespond.com/

  • Highsmith, J. (2004). Agile project management: Creating innovative products. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, C. F. (2012). Strategy and business techniques for improving execution. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi, D., & Sherwood-Smith, M. (1999). Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation. Logistics Information Management, 12(1/2), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059910256222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M. K., et al. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aken, J., & Romme, G. (2012). A design science approach to evidence-based management. In D. M. Rosseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 140–184). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrevska Nechkoska, R. (2020). The Tactical Management Method “DENICA” in Practice: Business Cases. In: Tactical Management in Complexity. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22804-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics