Advertisement

Experiences from the Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive in Cyprus

  • Thomas PapadopoulosEmail author
Chapter
  • 102 Downloads
Part of the Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation book series (SEELR, volume 17)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the implementation of the Cross-border Mergers Directive (hereinafter, “CBMD”) in Cyprus law. It provides a critical overview of the most important provisions of the Cyprus Companies Law (Chapter 113) implementing the CBMD. The basic definitions, the scope, the company types, the applicable law and the procedure of cross-border mergers are discussed. After this overview, various intricacies of the regulation of cross-border mergers in Cyprus are discussed. The various rules implementing the CBMD in Cyprus, as well as the Cyprus case law are scrutinized. The multi-level regulatory model of the CBMD is explained. Subsequently, the multi-level regulatory model in the implementation of the CBMD in Cyprus is analyzed with a special emphasis on the decision-making process, the creditor protection and the protection of minority shareholders. In the context of this multi-level regulatory model, “Arrangements and Reconstructions” in Cyprus Companies Law (Chapter 113), creditor protection in cross-border mergers and its reference to schemes of arrangement, as well as the decision-making process are analyzed. Moreover, in the same multi-level regulatory context, the protection of minority shareholders deriving from schemes of arrangement and from other legal bases in Cyprus Companies Law (Chapter 113) is scrutinised. After the analysis of the multi-level regulatory model, cross-border mergers and Cyprus case law on schemes of arrangement are explored. This chapter also focuses on gold-plating of the transposition of the CBMD into Cyprus law. At the end of the chapter, a few concluding remarks are inferred.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is financed by the Republic of Cyprus through the Research Promotion Foundation (Research Project: “Takeovers and Mergers in European, Cypriot and Greek Company Law” KOULTOURA//BP-ΝΕ/0514/18).

References

  1. Andenas M, Gütt T, Pannier M (2005) Free movement of capital and national company law. Eur Bus Law Rev 16(4):757–786Google Scholar
  2. Angelette B (2006) The revolution that never came and the revolution coming-De Lasteyrie du Salliant, Marks & Spencer, Sevic Systems and the changing corporate law in Europe. Virginia Law Rev 92:1188–1223Google Scholar
  3. Argyros G (2007) Employee participation in cross-border mergers in accordance with Directive 2005/56/EC and its differences with European Company. Labour Law Rev (Epitheorisi Ergatikou Dikeou) 66:321–334 (in Greek) [Αργυρός Γ (2007) H συμμετοχή των εργαζομένων στις διασυνοριακές συγχωνεύσεις σύμφωνα με την Οδηγία 2005/56/ΕΚ και οι διαφορές της με την Ευρωπαϊκή Εταιρία. Επιθεώρηση Εργατικού Δικαίου 66:321–334]Google Scholar
  4. Bech-Bruun and Lexidale (2013) Study on the application of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive, Directorate General for the internal market and services of the European Commission (MARKT/2012/031/F)Google Scholar
  5. Davies P, Worthington S (2012) Gower and Davies principles of modern company law. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. European Company Law Experts (ECLE) (2012) The future of European company law, response to the European Commission’s consultationGoogle Scholar
  7. François P, Hick J (2010) Employee participation: rights and obligations. In: Van Gerven D (ed) Cross-border mergers in Europe, vol I. CUP, Cambridge, pp 29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grundmann S (2012) European company law, 2nd edn. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Gullifer L, Payne J (2011) Corporate finance law. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Halsbury’s Laws of England (1993) 4th edn, Reissue, volume 20, Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatzimihail N (2013) Cyprus as a mixed legal system. JCivLS 6(1):37–96Google Scholar
  12. Kraakman R et al (2017) The anatomy of corporate law, 2nd edn. OUP, Oxford, pp 189–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krebs CA (2012) Freeze-out transactions in Germany and the U.S.: a comparative analysis. German Law J 13(8):941–978, 941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ntzoufas K (2006) Cross-border mergers after the new Directive 2005/56 and the Sevic judgment. Commercial Law Rev (Epitheorisi Emporikou Dikaiou) 57(3):798–824 (in Greek) [Ντζούφας Κ (2006) Οι διασυνοριακές συγχωνεύσεις εταιριών μετά τη νέα Οδηγία 2005/56 και την απόφαση Sevic Systems AG. Επιθεώρηση Εμπορικού Δικαίου 57(3):798–824]Google Scholar
  15. Pafitis P (2016) Company Law & Law of Partnership in the Republic of Cyprus. Christodoulos G. Vassiliades & Co LLC, pp 74–84Google Scholar
  16. Pannier M (2005) The EU Cross-Border Merger Directive – a new dimension for employee participation and company restructuring. Eur Bus Law Rev 16(6):1424–1442Google Scholar
  17. Papadima R (2015) Appraisal activism in M&A deals: recent developments in the United States and the EU. ECL 12(4):188–198Google Scholar
  18. Storm P (2006) Cross-border Mergers, the rule of reason and employee participation. Eur Company Law 3(3):130–138Google Scholar
  19. Storm P (2010) Scope and limitations of the Cross-Border Merger Directive. In: Van Gerven D (ed) Cross-border mergers in Europe, vol I. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 60–70, 72–73, 74–78Google Scholar
  20. Symeonides S (2003) The mixed legal system of the Republic of Cyprus. Tul Law Rev 78:441–455Google Scholar
  21. Tepass M (2012) Employee participation schemes and EU employment rules for cross-border reorganizations. In: Vermeylen J, Vande Velde I (eds) European cross-border mergers and reorganisations. OUP, Oxford, pp 123–142Google Scholar
  22. Tsadiras A (2010) Cyprus. In: Van Gerven D (ed) Cross-border mergers in Europe, vol I. CUP, Cambridge, pp 133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Eck GC, Roelofs ER (2011) Ranking the rules applicable to cross-border mergers. ECL 8(1):17–22Google Scholar
  24. Worthington S (2016) Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases and materials in company law, 11th edn. OUP, Oxford, pp 21–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations