Advertisement

Exploratory Study into Designing Enhanced Commute Experiences in Autonomous Vehicles with Connected Sensors and Actuators

  • Zheng SunEmail author
  • Hugues Vigner
  • Shreyas Bhayana
  • Changhao Zheng
  • Ziwei Zhang
  • Euiyoung Kim
  • Alice M. Agogino
Conference paper
  • 806 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11596)

Abstract

This paper discusses an exploratory study regarding user perceptions and behaviors associated with autonomous vehicles (AV). We conducted three research methods – interviews, observations, and surveys – to collect comprehensive user data for capturing useful insights. We found that comfort with light, vehicle safety, audio entertainment and itinerary transparency are the main four concerns that users in our study had in current transportation systems, especially in shared rides. Having these categories as our guidelines for design, we generated conceptsand built a low-fidelity prototype using connected sensors and actuators for user testing. Feedback from potential users and experts in the automobile industry were recorded to refine the proposed concept for further development.

Keywords

Automotive user interfaces Traveler’s behavior User interfaces for (semi) autonomous driving Women in transport Car sharing in (semi) autonomous vehicles 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the BRAVO lab and the Alliance (Renault-Nisan-Mitsubishi) for partially supporting this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.M., Nidhi, K., Stanley, K.D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O.A.: Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan, C.: Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 6(3), 208–216 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtstCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Litman, T.: Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions implications for transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, pp. 3–4 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Cholsaipan P., et al.: Reimagining onboard experiences for autonomous vehicle in academic makerspaces. In: 3rd International Symposium for Academic Makerspace (ISAM 2018). Stanford University (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu, J., Fan, Y.: Daily travel behavior and emotional well-being: effects of trip mode, duration, purpose, and companionship. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 118, 360–373 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., The U.K., and Australia. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2150 U.S.A. Report No. UMTRI-2014-21 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beckman, S.L., Barry, M.: Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. Calif. Manag. Rev. 50(1), 25–56 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Charmaz K., Belgrave L.L.: Grounded theory. Wiley Online Library (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. SAGE publications Ltd., Sonoma State University, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Globalwebindex Homepage. https://blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-day/uber-demographics/, last accessed 2019/02/13
  13. 13.
    Anderson, J.M., Nidhi, K., Stanley, K.D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O.A.: Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ioannou, P.A., Chien, C.C.: Autonomous intelligent cruise control. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 42(4), 657–672 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abraham, H., et al.: Autonomous vehicles, trust, and driving alternatives: a survey of consumer preferences. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, AgeLab (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi, J., Ji, Y.: Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 31(10), 692–702 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merat, N., Madigan, R. and Nordhoff, S.: Human factors, user requirements, and user acceptance of ride-sharing in automated vehicles. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M.: Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 94, 182–193 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brandon, L.: Pump up the bass—rhythm, cars, and auditory scaffolding. Senses Soc. 3(2), 187–203 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.2752/174589308X306420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh, M.J.: Driving to the beat of one’s own hum: automobility and musical listening, In: Denzin, N.K. (ed.) Studies in Symbolic Interaction, vol. 35, pp. 201–221 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mittendorf, C.: The implications of trust in the sharing economy – an empirical analysis of uber (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    CITRIS Invention Lab. http://invent.citris-uc.org, last accessed 2019/02/11

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hugues Vigner
    • 1
  • Shreyas Bhayana
    • 1
  • Changhao Zheng
    • 1
  • Ziwei Zhang
    • 1
  • Euiyoung Kim
    • 1
  • Alice M. Agogino
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations