Skip to main content

Agroecology: Science for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

As it stands, agriculture is unsustainable—economically, ecologically and socially. Its fundamental problem is the gross simplification of farming practice in pursuit of profit, aided and abetted by application of more power, more fertilizer , and more agrochemicals . A new concept of agricultural intensification is needed to make better use of natural resources and do less damage to the environment and society. Agroecology provides a rigorous basis for sustainable intensification. It draws on close observation of natural ecosystems ; integrates biological and ecological processes such as soil regeneration , nutrient cycling , nitrogen fixation , allelopathy , and competition; and minimizes use of non-renewable inputs that harm the environment or the health of farmers and consumers. It also makes full use of farmers ’ knowledge and skills, building self-reliance and substituting human capital for costly external inputs; and draws on collective capacity to solve common agricultural and natural resource problems. Fundamental features of natural ecosystems that should be respected in agroecosystems include: perennial vegetative cover or the nearest practical alternative that may include intercropping and cover crops as well as crop residues that protect the soil surface and conserve water; a regular supply of fresh organic matter that maintains soil biological activity; recycling augmented by a greater diversity of crops integrated with animal husbandry that regulate pests and diseases through heterogeneity at the field and landscape levels. A good example of mimicking natural ecosystems is the use within crop rotation of mixtures of perennial grasses , analogous to steppe or prairie vegetation. Structural changes in agriculture are needed to incorporate these principles into the existing farming systems . We should also undertake life cycle analysis of the whole food system —not only food production but also processing, marketing and consumption. Raising consumer awareness about the food quality and environmental health can assist the transition sustainability .

New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common.

Essay on human understanding. John Locke 1671.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allitt, P. (2014). A climate of crisis: America in the age of environmentalism. Penguin history of American life. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M.A., 1987 Agroecology: the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (1988). Beyond agroecology: Making sustainable agriculture part of a political agenda. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 3, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Z. G., Dent, D. L., Olsson, L., & Schaepman, M. E. (2008). Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use and Management, 24, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Z. G., Dent, D. L., Olsson, L., et al. (2015). A longer, closer look a land degradation. Agriculture for Development, 24(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, M., & LaVall, L. (2011). Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman, K. G., De Datta, S. K., Olk, D., et al. (1999). Yield decline and the nitrogen economy of long- term experiments on continuous irrigated rice systems in the tropics. In R. Lal & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Soil management. experimental basis for sustainability and environment quality (pp. 181–222). Advances in soil science. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C., Lieblen, G., Gliessman, S., et al. (2003). Agroecology: The ecology of food system. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22, 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. (2000). Agroecology: Ecological processes in sustainable agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. (1980). New roots for agriculture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C. (2015). Reframing the land-sparing/land sharing debate for biodiversity conservation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1355, 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2009). Soils and world food security. Soil and Tillage Research, 102, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Whitecraft, M., Scott, Z. R., et al. (2010). Will limited land, water and energy control human population numbers in the future? Springer Science + Business Media LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (1998). The living land: Agriculture, food and community regeneration in rural Europe. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. J. (2018). A Farmer’s perspective on sustainable agriculture: Fifteen years of conservation agriculture’s effect on soil and water Health. In J. A. Allan, et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of food, water and society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, V., Ramankutty, N., Mehrabi, Z., et al. (2018). How much of the world’s food do smallholders produce? Global Food Security, 17, 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P., & Martinez-Torres, M. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory and process. Ecology and Society, 17, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P., & Altieri, M. A. (1997). Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture. Society and Natural Resources, 10, 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, J., & Piper, J. (1992). Farming in Nature’s image: An ecological approach to agriculture. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2017). The right to food. Special report to the UN General Assembly, 27 February–24 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2007). Global environmental outlook GEO4, chapter 3 Land. UN Environment Programme. Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Ploeg, J. D. (2013). Peasants and the art of farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto. Agrarian change and peasant studies. Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanloqueren, G., & Baret, P. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38(6), 971–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., et al. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement, and a practice. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Boincean .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boincean, B., Dent, D. (2019). Agroecology: Science for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture. In: Farming the Black Earth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22533-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics