Abstract
Mexican drylands cover over 50% of its territory. They are important socio-ecological systems (SES), like rangelands that are vital, both for the conservation of multifunctional landscapes and for human development. The UNESCO Biosphere Reserve of Mapimí (BRM) is a dryland SES that harbors an extraordinarily high level of endemism in almost all biotic kingdoms and historically holds evidence of various mobile indigenous groups; later it became an important livestock production center. Thus, the BRM has been affected by land use and climate change for decades. Consequently, the BRM’s management plan by the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) seeks both the conservation of endangered species like the desert turtle and the implementation of sustainable development programs. In parallel, while long-term ecological research has generated ample knowledge on desert ecosystems, it has remained unavailable to local inhabitants, who hold local ecological knowledge and are, and will be, the key players and decision makers at the local scale. An interdisciplinary research group has responded to the challenge of linking knowledge systems in the context of global environmental change. They formed a transdisciplinary participatory research working-team with multiple stakeholders to develop projects that reflect interests of all actors. In this chapter, we describe the process of co-designing and jointly executing this research and further present the historic and current development challenges in the RBM, alongside a discussion on the adaptive potential of local communities, their production systems, and the dominant ecosystems in response to government help programs, adverse climatic conditions, and a strong tendency of out-migration. Transdisciplinary research brings numerous benefits when tackling sustainable development challenges in complex dryland SES.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agrawal A, Gibson CC (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev 27:629–649
Chapin III FS, Folke C, Kofinas GP (2009) A framework for understanding change. In: Chapin III FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds.) Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship. Springer Verlag, New York, p. 3–28
Chambers R (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Longman, London
CONANP (2006) Programa de Conservación y Manejo de Reserva de la Biosfera de Mapimí, México. CONANP, México D. F
Coppock DL, Desta S, Tezera S, Lelo RK (2004) Pastoral risk management in Southern Ethiopia: observations from pilot development projects based on participatory community assessments. ENVS Fac. Publ, Davis, pp 1921–1931
Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 41:1667–1676
Davis DK (2016) The arid lands: history, power, knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Delhoume JP (1992) Le milieu physique. In: Delhoume JP, Maury ME (eds) Actas Del Seminario Mapimí. Estudio de Las Relaciones Agua-Suelo-Vegetación En Una Zona Árida Del Norte de México Orientado a La Utilización Racional de Estos Recursos Para La Ganadería Extensiva de Bovinos. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Instituto Frances de Investigaciones Científicas para el Desarrollo en Cooperación (ORSTOM). Centro de Estudios Mexicanos y Centroamericanos, Coyoacán, p 396
di Castri F, Hadley M, Damlamian J (1981) MAB: the man and the biosphere program as an evolving system. Ambio 10(2–3):52–57
Durand L (2014) ¿Todos ganan? Neoliberalismo, naturaleza y conser- vación en México. Sociológica 82:183–223
Grunberger O, Reyes-Gomez V, Janeau JL (eds) (2004) Las playas del desierto chihuahuense
Guzmán M (2016) Las áreas naturales protegidas en el norte semiárido de México. Problemas de conceptuación y los desafíos de su gestión y manejo. In: Cañedo S, C Radding (eds.) Historia, medio ambiente y áreas naturales protegidas en el centro norte de México. Contribuciones para la ambientalización de la historiografía mexicana, siglos XVIII-XXI. El Colegio de San Luis, México, p 205–250
Halffter G (1978) Las Reservas de La Biosfera En El Estado de Durango: Una Nueva Polftica de Conservacidn y Estudio de Los Recursos Bidticos. In: Halffter G (ed) Reservas de La Biosfera en el Estado de Durango. Instituto de Ecología Publicación 4, Ciudad de México, pp 17–45
Halffter G (1981) The Mapimi Biosphere Reserve -Local Participation in Conservation and Development. Ambio 10:93–96
Hernández L (2001) Historia Ambiental de la ganadería en México. Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa
INEGI (2004) Cartografía Edafología Serie II Escala 1:25000
INEGI (2011) Capa Unión, Cartografía Uso del suelo y vegetación Escala 1:250 000 Serie V
Kaus A (1992) Common ground: ranchers and researchers in the Mapimí Biosphere Reserve. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside
Kaus A (1993) Environmental perceptions and social relations in the mapimi biosphere reserve. Cult Agric 45–46:29–34
López-Pardo JJ (2019) Análisis participativo de las obras de restauración: Estudio de caso ejido La Soledad. Master Thesis, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, San Luis
Mata-Páez RI (2019) Evaluación participativa del efecto de la intensidad de pastoreo en la funcionalidad ecohidrológica de los agostaderos de la Reserva de la Biósfera de Mapimí. Master Thesis, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, San Luis
Mata-Páez RI, Huber-Sannwald E, Martínez-Tagüeña N, Arredondo-Moreno J, Cázares-Reyes R, Reyes-Gómez VM, Urquidi-Macías JA (2018) La investigación participativa y su importancia para los estudios socio-ecológicos en zonas áridas: Estudio de caso del ejido La Soledad en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Mapimí, México. Memorias del IV Congreso Multidisciplinario de Ciencias Aplicadas En Latinoamérica, Mérida
Montaña C (1984) Ecological and socio-economic research in the Mapimí biosphere reserve. In: UNESCO, UNEP (eds) Conservation, Science and Society, contributions to the first international biosphere reserve congress, Minsk, Byelorussia/USSR, 26 September-2 October 1983. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Paris, pp 520–533
Montaña C (1988a) Mayor vegetation and environment units. In: Montaña C (ed) Estudio integrado de los recursos vegetación, suelo y agua en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Mapimí. Instituto de Ecología, Coyoacán, pp 99–115
Montaña C (1988b) Estudio integrado de los recursos vegetación, suelo y agua en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Mapimí. Instituto de Ecología, Coyoacán
Moraine M, Melac P, Ryschawy J, Duru M, Therond O (2017) A participatory method for the design and integrated assessment of crop-livestock systems in farmers’ groups. Ecol Indic 72:340–351
Nigh R (1989) El Desarrollismo Ecologista: Las Fantasias de La Conservacidn de La Naturaleza. Perfil de La Jornada 16:1–4
Rzedowski J (2006) Vegetación de México, México. CONABIO First Digital edition. https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/publicaciones/librosDig/pdf/VegetacionMx_Cont.pdf
Rzendowski J (1975) An ecological and phytogeographical analysis of the grasslands of Mexico. Taxon 24:67–80
Safriel U, Adeel Z, Niemeijer D, Puigdefabregas J, White R, Lal R, Winslow M, Ziedler J, Prince S, Archer E, King C (2005) Dryland systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C, pp 623–662
Scopus (2019) Elsevier B.V. [WWW Document]. URL https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic
SMN (2009) Datos mensuales, estación Ceballos 00010005, Mapimí, Durango [WWW Document]. URL http://smn.cna.gob.mx/tools/RESOURCES/Mensuales/dgo/00010005.TXT
SMN (2010) Información Climatológica [WWW Document]. URL http://smn.cna.gob.mx/es/informacion-climatologica-ver-estado?estado=dgo
Stafford Smith DM, Cribb J (2009) Dry times. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton
Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C (2006) Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social – ecological systems: a critical review. Ecol Soc 11(2):39
Toledo V (2005) Repensar la conservación: ¿áreas naturales protegidas o estrategia bioregional? Gaceta Ecol 77:67–83
Walker B, Abel N, Anderies JM, Ryan P (2009) Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Ecol Soc 14(1):12
Web of Science (2019) Clarivate Analytics [WWW Document]. URL https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=8ABQRfRJeCYX2lB3sFb&preferencesSaved=
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all dwellers of the Mapimi Biosphere Reserve, the technicians of CONANP, and collaborators of PRONATURA for generously sharing their knowledge and experience. We thank Héctor Sergio Cortina Villar from ECOSUR for fruitful discussions and José Alfredo Ramos Leal for valuable insights on geo-hydrological aspects of the reserve. EHS gratefully acknowledges the financial support from CONACYT (projects CB 2015-251388B, PDCPN-2017/5036). NMT thanks her Cátedra CONACYT ID Number 6133 as part of the project 615.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martínez-Tagüeña, N. et al. (2020). Conservation and Development in the Biosphere Reserve of Mapimí: A Transdisciplinary and Participatory Project to Understand Climate Change Adaptation. In: Lucatello, S., Huber-Sannwald, E., Espejel, I., Martínez-Tagüeña, N. (eds) Stewardship of Future Drylands and Climate Change in the Global South. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22464-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22464-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22463-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22464-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)