Skip to main content

Management of Impacted Teeth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Office-Based Maxillofacial Surgical Procedures
  • 1038 Accesses

Abstract

Removal of impacted teeth is one of the most common procedures performed by OMS. The most commonly impacted teeth are third molars. This chapter will include the indications and contraindications for the removal of impacted teeth, surgical technique, and possible complications.

The views expressed in this article (book, speech, etc.) are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army Medical Department, Department of the Army, DoD, or the U.S. Government

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bui C, Seldin EB, Dodson T. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1379–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips C, White R, Shugars D, et al. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1436–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stuart EL, Harry D, David F. AAOMS parameters of care dentoalveolar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(Suppl 1):e50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pell G, Gregory G. Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod. 1942;28:660.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rood J, Shehab A. The radiologic prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:20–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Osunde O, Adebola R, Saheeb B. A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1275–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rayne R. The unerupted maxilary canine. Dent Pract Denr Rec. 1969;19:194–205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stellzig A, Basadra E, Komposch G. The etiology of canine tooth impactions—a space analysis. Fortsher Kieferorthop. 1994;55(3):97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg M, Nemarich A, Marco W. Complications after mandibular third molar surgery: a statistical analysis of 500 consecutive procedures in private practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;111:277–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hinds E, Frey K. Hazards of retained third molars in older persons: report of 15 cases. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;101:2460250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sisk A, Hammer W, Shelton D, Joy E. Complications following third molar surgery: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:855–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wofford D, Miller R. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:15–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manson D. Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:290–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson P. Observations on the recovery of sensation following inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;26:177–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bouloux G, Steed M, Perciaccante V. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2007;19:117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Pairuchvej V. Clinically significant oroantral communications: a study of incidence and site. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;23:19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen P. The effect of chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following surgical removal of impacted mandibular molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:932–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ortega G, et al. An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res. 2012;174(1):33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vernon Burke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Latour, F., Burke, V. (2019). Management of Impacted Teeth. In: Ferneini, E., Goupil, M. (eds) Office-Based Maxillofacial Surgical Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22371-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22371-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22370-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22371-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics