Skip to main content

Performance Comparison of Two Guidance Systems for Agricultural Equipment Navigation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II (DSMIE 2019)

Abstract

Cover crops have been gaining popularity in the Northern Great Plains as an effective practice to improve soil health. An accurate guidance system when planting cover crops between rows of standing corn at V6-V8 stage requires precise navigation to avoid damaging standing crop, but field observations showed that the grain cart often trampled over rows of plant. Development of accurate and efficient methods, to find the correct path to guide the farm equipment automatically during these operations is an important need. In this project, the capabilities of Ultrasonic and Tactile navigation sensor (Reichhardtd® Electronic Innovation Products) were studied and compared. The objective of this study was to consider the difference between performances of two navigation systems that would guide the grain cart tires to move between rows for different operating conditions, speeds, patterns of rows, and terrain conditions. The comparison tests were conducted with five different fixed speeds, variable speeds, and four different row patterns in laboratory conditions on a purposefully designed test bench. The study results show that both sensors can successfully locate/identify row patterns if they are appropriately adjusted. But the steering system of the test bench has failed to respond with respect to the identified rows by the sensors due to a missing feedback controller. Moreover, appropriate digital filters were designed to remove undesired noises of signals read by the sensors and a fit model was found to compute exact physical location of the system with respect to rows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Snider, J.M.: Automatic Steering Methods for Autonomous Automobile Path Tracking. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-09-08, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Åstrand, B., Baerveldt, A.J.: A vision based row-following system for agricultural machinery. Mechatronics 15(2), 251–269 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Backman, J., Oksanen, T., Visala, A.: Navigation system for agricultural machines: nonlinear model predictive path tracking. Comput. Electron. Agric. 82, 32–43 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehsani, M.R., Upadhyaya, S.K., Mattson, M.L.: Seed location mapping using RTK GPS. Trans. ASAE 47(3), 909–914 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gearhart, C., Herold, A., Self, B., Birdsong, C., Slivovsky, L.: Use of Ultrasonic Sensors in the Development of an Electronic Travel Aid. In: IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium. https://doi.org/10.1109/sas.2009.4801815. New Orleans, LA, USA (2009)

  6. Lee, K., Ehsani, R.: Comparison of two 2D laser scanners for sensing object distances, shapes, and surface patterns. Comput. Electron. Agric. 60, 250–262 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reid, J.F., Searcy, S.W.: Vision-based guidance of an agricultural tractor. IEEE Control Syst. 7(12), 39–43 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sudduth, K.A., Dummond, S.T., Wang, W.W., Krumpelman, M.J.: Ultrasonic and GPS measurement of combine swath width. ASAE Paper No. 983096. St. Joseph, MI (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tofael, A., Tomohiro, T., Masayuki, K., Tsuyoshi, H., Hideo, H., Zhang, Q.: Navigation using a laser range finder for autonomous tractor (Part 1)-positioning of implement. J. Jpn. Soc. Agric. Mach. 68(1), 68–77 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss, U., Biber, P.: Plant detection and mapping for agricultural robots using a 3D LIDAR sensor. Robot. Auton. Syst. 59(5), 265–273 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Delavarpour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Delavarpour, N., Eshkabilov, S., Bon, T., Nowatzki, J., Bajwa, S. (2020). Performance Comparison of Two Guidance Systems for Agricultural Equipment Navigation. In: Ivanov, V., et al. Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II. DSMIE 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22365-6_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22365-6_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22364-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22365-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics