Advertisement

Development of Cognitive Transfer Tasks for Virtual Environments and Applications for Adaptive Instructional Systems

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11597)

Abstract

Spatial navigation and spatial learning are important skills with implications for many different fields, and can be trained in Virtual Environments (VEs). Research in these areas presents a critical challenge: how to best design tests of knowledge transfer to measure learning from the VEs. Additionally, spatial learning tasks and VEs can be implemented in Adaptive Instructional Systems (AISs), which could result in improved spatial navigation and learning. The current paper describes the development of transfer tasks to assess different levels of spatial learning from experience in a VE, including recall, recognition, route, bearings, and map drawing transfer tests. Details are provided in regard to how transfer questions were generated and the reasoning behind them. Implications for the use of similar tasks in AISs and Intelligent Tutoring Systems are discussed.

Keywords

Spatial navigation Virtual environments Transfer tasks Adaptive Instructional Systems Spatial learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the US Army Research Laboratory’s Human Research and Engineering Directorate. The authors would like to acknowledge Jason Moss who contributed to the conceptualization and development of the experiment. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyce, M.W.: From concept to publication - a successful application of using GIFT from the ground up. In: Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) Users Symposium (GIFTSym4), p. 125 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Craik, F.I., Lockhart, R.S.: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11(6), 671–684 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darken, R.P., Banker, W.P.: Navigating in natural environments: A virtual environment training transfer study. In: Proceedings of VRAIS 1998, pp. 12–19 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darken, R.P., Goerger, S.R.: The transfer of strategies from virtual to real environments: an explanation for performance differences? In: Proceedings of Virtual Worlds and Simulation 1999, pp. 159–164 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Files, B.T., Oiknine, A.H., Thomas, J., Khooshabeh, P., Sinatra, A.M., Pollard, K.A.: Same task, different place: Developing novel simulation environments with equivalent task difficulties. In: Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2019 Conference (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardony, A.L., Taylor, H.A., Brunyé, T.T.: Gardony map drawing analyzer: software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behav. Res. Methods 48(1), 151–177 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golledge, R.G., Dougherty, V., Bell, S.: Acquiring spatial knowledge: survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 85(1), 134–158 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasher, L., Zacks, R.T.: Automatic and effortful processes in memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 108(3), 356 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R.: Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 65–82. Springer, Heidelberg (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 10, 9–55 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sinatra, A.M.: The 2018 research psychologist’s guide to GIFT. In: The Proceedings of the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) User Symposium (GIFTSym6) (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sinatra, A.M.: The updated research psychologist’s guide to GIFT. In: Proceedings of the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) Users Symposium (GIFTSym4), p. 135 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sinatra, A.M.: The research psychologist’s guide to GIFT. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual GIFT Users Symposium, pp. 85–92 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sottilare, R.A., Brawner, K.W., Sinatra, A.M., Johnston, J.H.: An updated concept for a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) (2017). GIFTtutoring.org
  15. 15.
    van Asselen, M., Fritschy, E., Postma, A.: The influence of intentional and incidental learning on acquiring spatial knowledge during navigation. Psychol. Res. 70(2), 151–156 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the United States; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center – Simulation and Training Technology CenterOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.DCS CorporationLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.US Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering DirectorateLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations